Michigan Democratic Primary: Is the Party Trying to Lose Another Election?
Puerto Rico, American Samoa, and Guam Have More Say Than Michigan This Year Deciding the Next President
My first instinct was to say that put Michigan voters at about the same level of representation as Puerto Rico, American Samoa, and Guam. None. But after some research, I found that these "states" actually vote and send delegates. Yes, that means what you think it means:
Puerto Rico, American Samoa, and Guam have more say than Michigan this year deciding the next president.
This was the Party's way of "penalizing" Michigan, since Michigan moved its primaries earlier than the Party wanted.
Voters in Michigan should be outraged. And the Democrats were foolish.
The Democrats narrowly lost the presidency in 2004 in an election they should have won. The general consensus is that they "blew it" in 2004, which is starting to sound like a broken record, since many think they did the same in 2000. The word Democrat is becoming synonymous with electoral incompetency.
The broken record continues. They'll get away with it this year, but they Democrats are risking blowing another election they should easily win. Michigan is a swing state that picked Kerry over Bush in 2004, 51% to 48%.
Should Michigan's moderate Democrat swing voters vote for the Democrats in the general election after the Party chose Puerto Rico, American Samoa, and Guam over Michigan? My instinct is no, and the Party should have realized this.
Are the Democrats trying to alienate voters in a swing state? Are they trying to blow another election? The Republican Party was wise enough to count Michigan Republican votes at 50%, which is still wrong but makes the Republicans look great compared to Democrats, which is the norm during election years.
They'll probably get away with it and still win the election. The odds are stacked so much in their favor in 2008, that even the Democratic Party can't blow this one. But I hope the Democratic Party, which I usually vote for, will be a little smarter in the future. I prefer many of their policy stances, but competency rules in the end. We need government to represent us, not to disenfranchise.
And bravo to Hillary Clinton for being the only Democrat contender to put her name on Michigan's ballot. Last I checked, every adult taxpayer gets a vote, and it looks like Senator Clinton felt the same.
Published by Scott Schlimmer
Keep thinking big and advancing the world's knowledge! View profile
- Who Will Win the Michigan Primary?Which Republican will come out on top of the GOP primary in Michigan?
- Could Hillary Clinton Steal the Nomination?In a normal Presidential nomination race, the candidate who garners the most delegates wins the nomination. The 2008 Democratic Nomination race may be the exception. Even though she may come up with less delegates tha...
- Michigan and Florida Want First in Presidential PrimariesA surprising battle over who will hold the first Presidential Party Primaries is currently taking place throughout the national political scene.
- Is Michigan Trying to "Beat Off" Florida for the Title of the State that Finally K...Now that Florida and Michigan have both moved up their primaries will the voters once again be left holding their collective johnsons in their collective hands? The Democratic National Committee has already answered yes!
- Issues Found Throughout the History of American LaborAn essay on issues found throughout the history of American Labor including craft industrialism, Sherman Act jurisprudence, modern liberalism,the National Civic Federation, industrial democracy, and more.
- Do Republicans Cheat During the Democrat's Primary?
- Michigan Presidential Primary Delegate Controversy
- Understanding the Nevada Caucuses: Hillary Clinton & Mitt Romney Win Majorities in...
- In Michigan and Florida Rules May Not Apply
- Analysis: Understanding the New Hampshire Primary Results
- Presidential Primary Reform:
- Mississippi Primary Results: Barack Obama Wins




6 Comments
Post a CommentLooks like Michigan gets the last laugh. I wonder how many will forget the primary snubbing. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1828307,00.html
Kim - I'm embarrassed to say I too didn't vote in this year's primaries. I have made financial contributions though, which I'm starting to believe have more of an impact than votes, particularly at the local level. Will - something I forgot to add about the convoluted Dem primary. The process seems (unintentionally) set up to 1) end with one candidate winning the popular vote while the other wins more delegates or 2) Pick a candidate that will lose the general election despite winning the popular vote.
"The word Democrat is becoming synonymous with electoral incompetency." I fully agree with you & just tonight saw Howard Dean on Tavis Smiley again trying to clear up this mess that even a grammar school child can see is unfair. Would a segment of the class be prevented from say participating in a school pageant or event? Bottom line: It's a maddening process with the most confusing rules which I don't think most Democratic leaders even fully grasp nor certainly embrace, yet I suppose they stumble along with dogma. Thanks again for another great article, Scott.
I agree with you 100%. I think the whole voting system needs to be overhauled. This is why many young people don't want to mess with it. My 21 year old son refuses to vote because he thinks it doesn't really matter. Don't even get me started on the Super Delegate thing! Nice article Scott.
I do and I know how you feel....I feel the same way, its so discouraging...and Fla too is a disgrace...our votes not counting makes me sick...
Does anybody care?