I consider myself a big-time mega movie buff. Not the kind of person who obsesses over films and knows every movie from every single genre from A-Z. I am the kind of person who tends to watch every type of movie when I can and enjoy a lot of different types of film (from "Singing in The Rain" to "Kill Bill"). I might not be able to reference barely any movies before the 1970s, but I tend to hit the local theaters every other week and am, like many, a die-hard user of Netflix. While I tend to watch more comedies and action flicks, I am always drawn to a film that tells a great epic story.
When I first heard of Harry Potter, I was like some others in dismissing it as a story "just for little kids". Whenever I heard of an older person in their 20s/30s talking about Potter like it was the greatest thing on this Earth, I tended to roll my eyes a bit and laugh at the thought. Even though I used to be a hardcore comic book reader and current pro wrestling watcher, I offensively and snobbishly had the opinion that some of these Harry Potter were more "dorky" than me. When asked, I said that I had absolutely no interest in reading the books or seeing the films in fear of not enjoying them. But when the third Potter film, "Harry Potter and The Goblet of Fire" came out, my wife (who was my girlfriend at the time and am a big Potter fan) convinced this hard-headed person to check it out and give it a chance. Once I watched it and my wife explained all of the other details to the overall story that I was missing, I was instantly hooked. I found the characters in this film to be really cool and interesting, the story here was excellent (particularly with the confrontation at the end with Potter and Voldemort, played brilliantly by the scary-looking Ralph Fiennes), and the style of the movie was very unique to say the least. It never really dipped too much into the usual typical trappings of a "fantasy/sci-fi" film and never appeared too much like a film directly made for little kids (as I once assumed).
After this, I watched the first three films and been anticipating every film afterward since. So again, the question is why would I claim that this movie series to be better than the other seemingly good ones mentioned above. The answer is simple: the story. Even since I first watched the original 'Star Wars' as kid, I noticed in my increase of movie watching that many people have attempted to create another great movie "trilogy" for people to follow. But even though these films were considered pretty good, they don't hold a full candle up to Potter. Despite the first two of their series being good, I thought both the "Matrix" and "Spider Man" suffered big time by having a universally disliked ending in their third installments. I loved the "Lord of The Rings"when it first came out, but realized in watching the third film "Return of The King" again that there was way too much going on with all of the main characters that I really didn't care what happened to them in the end. And the precious "Bourne" series with Matt Damon as agent Jason Bourne was (and still is) so damn awesome, but I realized that the movies aren't for everyone, especially younger kids. So with my thoughts back to my once cherished "Star Wars", I debated on if I loved it more than my new love for the Potter films. And came to the realization last night that the answer is a resounding "Yes".
While the epic and well-known story of "Star Wars" will always have a place deep in my heart, the depth of the tale in Potter completely blows it away. Without going into any more details (cause this column is already long enough as is), after seeing 'Half-Blood Prince' last night, I think that Potter is the best movie series ever because of the story being surprisingly much more mature and much more complex (even with many details cut from the book...according to my wife) than any series-based films that I've ever seen. Period. Sorry Chewbacca.
Published by Julian Bond
My name is Julian Bond and I have 10+ years of journalism/writing experience. This includes past work with the Detroit Free Press and 4+ years as a feature writer for UofM college newspaper. Published over 2... View profile
- Harry Potter Facing an Evil Greater than Voldemort: the Book-banning Club of Gwinn...Harry Potter as paragon of witchcraft.
Sectus 2007, a Harry Potter Fan Conference in London, July 19-22, 2007A look at the costs and offerings of Sectus 2007, a Harry Potter fan conference taking place in London in July 2007.- Harry Potter and the Prisoner of AzkabanHarry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban is an intelligent, fantasy adventure film for members of the entire family.
- 'MAGYK: Septimus Heap, Book One' by Angie Sage to Tide Kids Over 'til Next Harry P...If you've already devoured the Harry Potter books, you have a new treat in store. MAGYK: Septimus Heap is the first book in a promising new fantasy trilogy by Angie Sage.
- Harry Potter Grows UpHarry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince Review.
- Review: Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
- Phoenix Rising, a Harry Potter Conference in New Orleans, May 17 - 21, 2007
- Harry Potter Book 7 Named
- Harry Potter Book 7 Predictions
- Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows To Be Released This July
- Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Already at #1
- J.K. Rowling's Final Harry Potter Book Already a Bestseller




2 Comments
Post a CommentThanks!! Yea, I've asked everyone (and mostly my wife) what was missing from the movie because I never read the book, and while the missing parts sounded horribly exciting, I thought from a "I don't know anything about Potter except for what I've seen on film" viewpoint it was best that they left all of that stuff out. Otherwise it would have been like 5 hours long!! :)
Great article! I am a reader, but found this movie was actually better than the book, largely because of what they left out.