Providing an interesting contrasting view, economist, political scientist, and author (The Skeptical Environmentalist) Lomborg never denies the issues of environmental protection, nor does he suggest we should abandon all efforts. What he does suggest is a reprioritization for the world's limited financial resources and an end to the scare tactics employed by Gore and others who imply the world will come to an end if we don't put all our eggs in the global warming basket.
Environmentalists Attack
Lomborg's controversial position has derived much criticism, most notably from Stephen Schneider. Before his death in July, Schneider was Professor of Environmental Biology and Global Change at Stanford University. In one of several interviews "Cool It!" director Ondi Timoner ("We Live in Public", "Dig!") taped with the professor, he refers to Lomborg as "the devil incarnate." The director herself admits that she initially viewed Lomborg as the "anti-Christ" until she became personally acquainted with him.
Such vehement criticism and socially charged labels set the stage for the battle Lomborg is up against within the environmental community. It also poses the question of why such horrendous, personal attacks on someone with an opposing point of view, especially since Lomborg's viewpoint has strong substantiation. And, let's face it, a Nobel Prize and Oscar aside, Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth" has not convinced everyone that the message it carried was entirely truthful.
Numbers Don't Lie
Lomborg views the world as the economist that he is. So, it's no wonder when he convened the Copenhagen Consensus Center he would fill his think tank with other economists. And, like it or not, global warming is about the numbers - and big numbers they are. The European Union alone plans on spending $250 billion a year on carbon offsets.
While Lomborg argues that unwarranted panic has no place in productive discussions, he acknowledges the need for the debate. As shown in "Cool It!", there is still plenty of debate even amongst those who see the benefit in Lomborg's approach of applying cost-benefit analysis as a large part of the discussion.
The Real Inconvenient Truth
While Lomborg concedes the inconvenient truth of global warming, he debunks the apocalyptic scenarios that have been undertaken in an effort to attract billions in environmental issue funding. Money that, according to Lomborg, is being spent on costly, ineffective, and inefficient solutions. Lomborg argues that global warming should be addressed, but that the unwarranted panic set in motion by Gore and proponents of "An Inconvenient Truth" has diverted attention and financing from far more severe global issues - like poverty, AIDS, malnutrition, and education.
Lomborg questions the notion that funds are deserved simply by those "who shout the loudest."
The real inconvenient truth seems to be that if people put their money where Lomborg's mouth is, environmentalists and environmental researchers may see the effects where it hurts the most - in their funding.
How to Cool It!
"This is not a doomed planet," Lomborg says at one point in "Cool It!", and, by the end we begin to believe him. Lomborg's premise of approaching global problems from a place of creativity, rather than of fear, comes across no clearer than in the end of the film. As "Cool It!" moves past Lomborg's opposition, we see an array of ideas that not only seem possible but extremely practical.
Painting streets and rooftops white, Lomborg claims, reduces temperature by redirecting a city's warmth, mitigating the minimal effects of global warming. Along with urban cooling and geo-engineering, Lomborg proposes the use of alternative energy sources, such as algae fuel and wave power, to help combat the problem while still allowing for a reasonable standard of living.
In "Cool It!" Lomborg and Timoner have portrayed not only the problem of global warming but addressed much greater issues needing global awareness in a film that is immensely hopeful.
The sky just may not be falling afterall.
This content was based upon a free review copy the Contributor received.
Published by Martha Fry - Featured Contributor in Business & Finance
Martha Fry works as a freelance writer and editor. An accountant who worked at Peat, Marwick & Mitchell and Price Waterhouse, she also does financial consulting and often writes on business and personal fina... View profile
- Danger and Opportunity: A Review of An Inconvenient TruthA review of "An Inconvenient Truth,' Al Gore's 2006 book based on the global warming presentations he has been giving for years.
New Documentary Film "An Inconvenient Truth...or Convenient Fiction" Tak...A well represented short film (less than 50 minutes) that debates some of what Al Gore's film, "An Inconvenient Truth" had to say by filling in those "conveniently" missing piec...- An Inconvenient Truth - a ChallengeI challenge everyone to watch Al Gore's, An Inconvenient Truth, and not be changed.
An Inconvenient Truth: A Documentary About Global WarmingThis documentary combining biography and scientific data offers even the skeptic of the conclusions about global warming concrete and right means for slowing down the changes to...- Summary: An Inconvenient TruthThe documentary film, "An Inconvenient Truth," provides an unequivocally thorough and critical analysis of the current state of the physical terrestrial environment due to climate change and global warming.
- Al Gore's Inconvenient Truth About Divorce and Morality
- An Inconvenient Truth: Netflix Movie Review in 500 Words or Less
- An Inconvenient Truth Movie Review: We Are More Powerful Than Carbon Dioxide
- Response to Al Gore's Movie An Inconvenient Truth
- Al Gore's Global Warming Campaign Gains Another Detractor
- Movie Review: An Inconvenient Truth
- Share the Truth, "An Inconvenient Truth" and the Tragedy of the Commons





20 Comments
Post a CommentGood job!
The main thing Lomborg presents to us, is that in order to solve our problems we must first be open to new and sometime thought provoking ideas. It sadden me that it's easier and faster to move people's thoughts with fears, rather than that of wisdom and knowledge, but, atlas in time the facts win out, they always do, and that is what give me hope for the future of our children, and our children,s children.
I've read Lomborg's book, saw the movie, and was convinced even before doing both that global warming was and always will be Al Gore's way to get rich. Bad weather will come and go, but global catastrophe just isn't happening. It's in the data.
Just stopping by to wish you and your loved ones a Happy Happy Holiday!
This one is new to me. Excellent review! My best wishes for Christmas and the New Year! rcj
Thanks for the review. I've also not heard of this film.
Sophie
News to me Martha. Great work. ^i^
Need to see this one.
interesting, I also never heard of it
Interesting information