But some people seemed to be rather disappointed by the whole thing. They felt it let down Douglas Adams' vision of the Guide. Which is odd, because Adams' vision of the guide changed so often over the years, the only thing you could have reliably said about the movie in advance would be that it would be completely different to anything preceding it.
And there's been a lot preceding it. The series (which for brevity, we'll refer to henceforth as H2G2, as Douglas himself often did) started as a BBC radio series. After being a moderate success, he was encouraged to write a book of the series. 'Encouraged' possibly being not strong enough a word, given he frequently had to be confined to a hotel room by his publishers. Eventually the novel came out, and went straight to the top of the bestsellers. Over the years, it was followed by four more novels, further radio series, a television series, a text-adventure game, two stage plays, and a commemorative towel. And each individual incarnation of H2G2 has been somewhat different to the others, if not flatly contradicting the events in them.
This was a deliberate move by Adams, and an understandable one. Imagine having to rewrite the same story, over and over, in half a dozen different formats. I for one would certainly want to add a few twists along the way.
All the versions (except the towel, I suppose), start off in pretty much the same way, with Arthur Dent waking up to discover his house is about to be demolished by the council. Events escalate, and he ends up being rescued from a demolished Earth by his old friend Ford Prefect, who turns out to be from Betelgeuse, and not Guildford after all. Beyond this point, all bets are off, and the plot can go anywhere.
Everyone has their favorite version of H2G2, and I think this is where the problem comes in with the movie. I grew up with the books, but I have a fondness for the radio series, which was something that had never been quite done before, in terms of production and script. Others remember the TV series as their favorite, despite the somewhat creaky special effects. Regardless of which, everyone has their own 'special' version, the one which sits in their mind and colours how they expect things to be.
And this is where the movie departs, for some; it's very much got its own individual style, the actors are a completely completely new cast, and it may look radically different to the other takes. Arthur's love life is focused on much more than in previous versions, and that may be a stumbling block to some.
For those who've never come across H2G2, it might leave them in the cold; the humour by this point is well honed, and geared towards making the sort of people who find this sort of thing funny laugh, and isn't quite what you'd get from a modern comedy.
Personally, I loved it. The new cast worked well on the whole, the movie definitely had a unified, 'sexy' stylising to it, and compared to some of the treatments suggested in the eighties and nineties, this was about as close to Adams' humour as you're going to get.
Published by Wolfechu
The world's foremost authority on finding ways to waste time. 38, British, living with his American wife in Missouri, pining for a proper cup of tea. View profile
- Modern Mythology AnalysisAnalyzing The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams as science fiction myth.
Reflections on Douglas Adams' Books and How They Predicted Cutting Edge...Every day, we seem to be drawing closer to something approaching the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, as described by Douglas Adams in the book series of the same name...- A Guide to The Hitchhiker's Guide on DVDAfter spending nearly twenty years in development Hell, The Hitchhiker's guide to the Galaxy finally achieved a theatrical release and is now available on DVD.
Doctor Who: City of Death This four-part story from Season Seventeen, City of Death, was co-penned by then-script editor Douglas Adams (The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy) and producer Graham Will...- Meaninglessness in Adams' the Hitchhiker's Guide to the GalaxyThis is a crtical analysis paper that examines the theme of meaninglessness in seeking answers to the meaning of life in Douglas Adams' The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.
- The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, Tertiary Phase by Douglas Adams
- Film Review: the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Based on a Novel by Douglas Adams
- The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: Dude, Where's My Spaceship?
- A Look at The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
- The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Both Wicked and Lighthearted
- Don't Panic! the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Has You Covered!
- The Best Quotes by Douglas Adams




