Myriad Genetics is the only company that is able to perform the BRCA test at a cost of $3,000. Not only are they the only lab that can test, but Myriad "owns" the patent to the BRCA gene itself so only they will ever be able do the test unless they allow other companies access to their research. Myriad has no plans to do that, they feel that they have spent the money, time and energy required to do the research in refining the DNA of this gene. Myriad believes that this entitles them to have sole control or should I say sole money making control in the diagnosis of these terrifying diseases. Breast cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in women and ovarian cancer affects over 20,000 women a year, but its physical symptoms are more difficult to diagnose.
The ACLU has taken on the U.S. Patent office and Myriad Genetics in court to contest the ownership of something that was unimaginable to own 15 years ago. How does a company have sole ownership of a gene? Myriad Genetics is not the only company that has obtained patents to genes and others could be named in the lawsuit. Patents have been placed on 20% of the human genome that have been discovered such as the one owned by FAMILION® for a long Q-T interval, that affects heart arrhythmias. However, to their credit the non-for-profit company that owns the patent to the Cerebral Palsy gene CFTR has made their research available to others to benefit the progression of research and development of treatments and cures.
If only Myriad can lay claim to a gene and prevent other companies from access, imagine the stalemates that have been created.
1. Future gene research is believed to need the compliances of several genes studied together to come up with progressive cures and treatments. How can that progress occur if only Myriad or any company lays claim to "their" gene and will not allow others access to collaborate.
2. No test is infallible. Dr. Nancy Schneiderman, on the Today show aptly pointed out that there is no second opinion option to make sure that the Myriad BRCA test is absolutely accurate. Does Myriad see that in the future someone can sue them if their test results were wrong and they suffer irreversible harm since their test could not be confirmed with another lab?
3. Without free market competition, Myriad can control and charge what ever they want for the BRCA test. The only other way other companies can compete would be to spend time figuring out alternative tests, which may not be as accurate and waste time and energy "reinventing the wheel" instead of coming up with a "new wheel" needed to move gene research forward.
We are entering a new age and territory in gene research and ownership of genetic property that will need firm guidelines to keep the momentum of cancer and disease cures progressing instead of being back logged in the courts like custody battles gone bad. The idea that a company can "own" a piece of life seems unfathomable. Didn't we give up "owning" pieces of people's lives when slavery was abolished? No one is trying to take away Myriad's ability to make money, but how much money is a company entitled to just for being first?
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/13/health/13patent.html?ref=health
Published by Michele Blacksberg
- ACLU Sues Over Right to Use Obscene GestureEver protective of civil liberties, the ACLU has found another cause to fight for U.S. Citizens--their right to flip other off. Is it really First Amendment infringement or just a total waste of time?
- Tips for Court Reporting Students What I recommend court reporting students do to enhance their careers and earn more money.
- Politics in the Supreme CourtA review of Supreme Court History and an analysis of whether the Court is sufficiently insulated or not. The author claims that the Supreme Court can not be saved from politics and should embrace the opportunity for c...
- On-Court Basketball WorkoutThe following are exercises to combine into a total body workout for a basketball player using only a basketball, a court and a medicine ball.
- Supreme Court Attorney Adresses Hot Button IssueThis articles speaks of Mark Stancil and his experience trying to defend his client Martin Bustillo in front of the Supreme Court. This details his discussion of how foreign nationals are handled in the United States...
- Tarenflurbil (Flurizan): A Promising Alzheimer's Disease Treatment Drug
- Roe V. Wade and the Court that Made the Decision
- Baldwin Basinger Battle: Court Orders Silence
- Oakland Raiders Lose Again as California Supreme Court Rules for NFL
- How to Behave During a Court Room Appearance
- Guide for Choosing a TV Court Judge
- Court Ruling Paves Way for Cumberland Farms Store in Deep River, Connecticut




