Nadya Suleman Receives Welfare

She Just Doesn't Want to Call it That

Sandra Petersen
After her interview with Ann Curry of NBC, in which she stated she was not collecting public assistance for the octuplets she delivered or for her other six children, Nadya Suleman has come under even more scrutiny. It was only a matter of time before a news reporter discovered the source of finances for Suleman and her large brood. According to the Los Angeles Times at least two sources told the paper Nadya Suleman receives not only Social Security income for three of her first six children but also food stamps.

Granted, $490 in food stamps barely provides a month of food for a family of four. Food stamps, or the debit-like card provided by the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), is still a federal assistance program. According to the USDA website, Suleman and her fourteen children could have a gross monthly income up to $6587 (Oct. 1, 2008, through Sept. 30, 2009, income guidelines) and still qualify for some level of federal food assistance. The three children receiving SSI cannot obtain SNAP assistance from the federal government because California adds a benefit to their SSI.

When our family of three received food stamps almost twenty years ago, there was no question that the food stamp program was a federal program administered by individual states. The amount of paper work and documentation required to apply was an indication that food stamps was a federal welfare program.

If Suleman is receiving $1800 of monthly SSI benefits for three of her children, those children must be getting some kind of medical assistance as well. Depending upon the disability, the children could also be receiving physical or occupational therapy. Her three-year-old son, Aidan, has autism and will, according to Suleman, require SSI longer than the other two children who receive it. The children receiving SSI must be screened periodically by medical doctors to determine if they qualify for the SSI benefit.

Yet Michael Furtney, Suleman's publicist, says she does not consider those things public assistance. He does not deny she receives these benefits. By the way, does Furtney get paid to be Suleman's publicist or are his services donated?

When asked by Curry, Suleman stated that she had difficulty providing for her first six children well before her octuplets were delivered. Until 2000, she was employed as a psychiatric technician. After that time she was collecting temporary disability payments for a herniated disc in her back, an injury received in a state hospital riot. She and her children were living with her mother Angela Suleman in her mother's home in Whittier, California.

According to a Los Angeles Times report, Nadya owes about $50,000 in student loans, yet has intentions of returning to graduate school for eighteen months to complete a master's degree in counseling. By doing this, she will accumulate additional debt. If she is able to get a job in the counseling field, she may be able to have part of her student loans received from the federal government waived. Incidentally, Suleman said in a second interview with Ann Curry that she would raise her children with the money she received in student loans.

When I went back to college to receive my Bachelor's degree, I received federal student loans. I also worked the maximum number of hours I was allowed per week under the work study program. Our family of three relied on the federal food stamp program and state medical assistance even with that income. After college, I became pregnant and devoted myself to being a full-time stay at home mother. We paid off all of my student loans when my husband got a full-time job after the birth of our second child.

The Huffington Post reports Nadya Suleman is seeking public assistance of another variety. She has set up a website on which those sympathetic to the needs of her children can donate material resources or money by way of a credit card.

At one time, there were five family members living in our house. We collected no medical assistance, food stamps, or other welfare and lived on my husband's income as a security officer at a medical center. It was and still is difficult to make ends meet. If Suleman can raise her fourteen children without welfare, it will be a bigger miracle than the birth of her octuplets.

*****************

Sources:

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2009/02/nadya-suleman-w.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/11/octuplet-mom-nadya-sulema_n_166030.html

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-octuplets11-2009feb11,0,1790195.story More detail about assistance available to Suleman.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29135989/ Summary of a second interview with NBC's Ann Curry.

Published by Sandra Petersen

Sandra Petersen is a freelance writer living in Two Harbors, Minnesota. This home educator likes to garden in natural ways using no pesticides. An avid researcher, especially in Civil War and Victorian Londo...  View profile

13 Comments

Post a Comment
  • John4/2/2012

    You take away birth control and other options, this is what you get and the main ones that are crying the loudest about this lady receiving welfare benefits are the ones that are marching in front of plan parenthood! Go Figure!

  • Katie Sharp4/28/2009

    I can't believe this woman. I had two kids, and I'm done! I think it's ok to have kids if you can both mentally and financially afford them.

  • Anonymous2/27/2009

    Hopefully once ANY donations come in she reports it to the welfare office, it IS income and should help out the state of California in lowering the amount of benefits she should be able to qualify for.

  • AC2/25/2009

    Why are taxpayers paying for an irresponsble dumbass? If you already had 6 kids with no way of supporting them, why have more? Honestly! But at least she could afford plastic surgery... WTF?! We shouldn't have to fork out 1 dime for her or the kids. If she can't take care of them, take them away, or put them up for adoption! Enough is enough!

  • mymel2/14/2009

    In the Middle East some mothers used their bodies to carry out suicide attacks against their enemies and we condemn such action.
    Nadya used her body for a different reason she risked her life and that of her 8 premie babies not to mention the other 6 small children who are left in the care of their exhausted granny. It seems Nadya is passing the blame on her mother for being an only child. She was thinking only of herself needing to love or be loved by her children. She forgets about the woman who loved her first.

  • Moeursalen2/13/2009

    Juniper, take it easy... Everyone realizes that SSI and other welfare programs may be used precisely to help the persons for whom it is intended, and not those who play the system as if it was a guaranteed lotto. Besides, the writer even mentioned FS for her own family so there was no shame or stigma... But this Suleyman thing should be addressed--it's legal fraud--and by no means an isolated incident.

  • Moeursalen2/13/2009

    This is some of the best, tightest, and thorough reporting I've ever seen on AC. The minute I saw the woman on TV, I thought they had to be getting SSI in huge incentivizing amounts. Is Ann Curry clueless?

  • Juniper2/12/2009

    She receives SSI and food stamps. That's not the same thing as welfare. My husband gets SSI because he is profoundly disabled, and I despise the stereotype that we're a "welfare family". We receive payments from social security, which is an insurance company that we paid into. I feel no shame in receiving benefits that we are fully entitled to, and it pisses me off that women like Nadya Suleman give a bad name to disabled families.

  • Mrs Raventon2/12/2009

    I can't believe she decided to have so many children when she can't afford them; I wonder if she suffers from some kind of mental illness.

  • K. Karl2/12/2009

    I would just like to know how a woman with a herniated disc managed to carry 8 babies and not be in excruciating pain her entire pregnancy. She now has a website for donations. This is looking like a huge scam. Those poor kids. Good report Sandy!

Displaying Comments
Next »

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.