Nancy Pelosi Condemns Musharraf's Emergency Powers Acts in Pakistan

Brant McLaughlin

On Monday, in response to Pakistan's President Pervez Musharraf imposing emergency rule and suspending Pakistan's constitution, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi issued a harsh statement condemning his actions and the policies of the Bush Administration toward him.

"For too long, President Musharraf failed to confront effectively his growing unpopularity. The Bush Administration enabled Musharraf's delusion by ignoring his undemocratic acts and lack of internal support in exchange for his assistance in efforts against terrorism. Pakistan will only be a reliable and capable ally against terrorism when its government is not seen as an enemy by its own people," said Pelosi.

Critics of Speaker Pelosi and the Democratic majority in the Congress say that the statement that the Office of the Speaker of the House published is counterproductive and inappropriate, while being motivated not by a concern for national security or foreign policy but merely by all-too-common political posturing.

The Bush Administration also condemned the actions of Musharaff immediately, who as military commander has detained or locked up in excess of 1000 political critics and opponents as well as lawyers and shut down a wide array of independent television stations and media outlets since he invoked emergency powers and martial law on Saturday.

United States Central Command head Admiral William Fallon had actually met with Musharaff on Friday to inform him that if he invoked emergency powers the Bush Administration and the United States military would condemn his actions.

At the behest of a multitude of Pakistani lawyers and "constitutionalists", the Pakistani Supreme Court had been called upon to rule on the legality of Musharaff's re-election last month, an action that Musharaff declared was the action of a hostile judiciary and which prompted him to invoke emergency powers.

The judiciary in Pakistan has been gaining in power and support since the early part of 2007.

In the wake of the harsh criticism from the United States, Musharaff has pledged that he will hold new elections in mid-January as originally planned, and will retire from the military.

Musharff's popularity and his control over national security in Pakistan were damaged in July when he unleashed commandos on the sacred Red Mosque of Islamabad in order to crush what was reportedly a violent and armed fundamentalist Islamic uprising there.

Maintaining order and security in Pakistan is very difficult because it is a nation where politics has been dominated by military leaders and dictators and is only in very recent years attempting the transition to a democratic form of government with a rights-protecting Constitution.

The United States has been allowed to rely strongly on the permission to utilize Pakistan's infrastructure and air space to carry out anti-terrorism war operations in neighboring Afghanistan.

Critics of Musharff have said that in spite of his efforts, he has been largely ineffective at quelling or stamping out forces of radical, terror-based Islam in his nation, with a good portion of his military commanders covertly helping out terrorism recruits within Pakistan who have fled their military defeats in other areas such as Afghanistan and Iraq.

A United States military intelligence report released in the summer stated that the Taliban organization had managed to do some considerable regrouping after its defeats because members were able to hide out and lick their wounds in Pakistan.

Analysts are troubled that if the political situation in Pakistan is not quickly re-stabilized, the nation could become even more of an active meeting and breeding ground for Islamic terrorists, and Coalition operations in Afghanistan might be compromised, especially given the fact that Pakistan possesses nuclear weapons.

Original Newswire Source:

http://prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/11-05-2007/0004697987&EDATE=

Published by Brant McLaughlin

I am a Writer driven by endless curiosity and a deep desire to waste time creatively.  View profile

4 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Brant McLaughlin11/7/2007

    HI Kelly...yes, I'm aware the situation has much more complexity to it, but the point of my news story was to get the word out and provoke thought in a timely manner--not write an essay. But I do appreciate your well-informed commentary.

  • TN LawGirl11/6/2007

    We laid down with a lot of dogs. Musharraf included. We may wake up with a lot worse than fleas.

  • kelly m.11/6/2007

    By the way, any American should be grateful we live here, where even if we believe our President is whittling away at the constitution, he cannot outlaw it. And, we may not agree with what political rivals do or say publicly, but they are FREE to speak up because of the way our country works. 'Enemies' of the army disappear every day in Pakistan and that is worsened by the state of emergency. Again, a very good article and I enjoyed reading it.

  • kelly m.11/6/2007

    This is a good article, but the situation is much more complex. Musharraf's state of emergency parallels that of Indira Gandhi in similar circumstances in India in the late 1970s, and it is consistent with militarily run governments masquerading as Democracies. The horrific results of Gandhi's constitutional suspension far outweighed the reality she was soon out of power. It will be the same for Musharraf, and diplomats saw this coming. Bhutto's visit was the handwriting on the wall.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.