NASA Admits that 1934, Not 1998, was the Warmest Year on Record

Brant McLaughlin
In one more devastating blow against the global warming or "climate Apocalypse" supporters such as former Vice President Al Gore, NASA stated today that it was wrong when it release a report that 1998 was the warmest year ever recorded in modern history.

According to H. Sterling Burnett, a senior fellow at the National Center for Policy Analysis (NCPA), NASA scientist and famous man-made global warming proponent James Hansen's well-known claims that 1998 was measured as the warmest year on record in the U.S. were the result of a serious mathematical error. NASA has now corrected that error, and 1934 is now known as the warmest year on record, with 1921 the third warmest year instead of 2006 as was also previously claimed.

Moreover, NASA now also has to admit that three of the five warmest years on record occurred before 1940-it has up until now held that all five of them occurred after 1980.

And perhaps most devastating of all to the man-made global warming backers, it is now admitted that six of the 10 hottest years on record occurred when only 10% of the amount of greenhouse gases that have been emitted in the last century were in the atmosphere.

NASA has been forced to correct calculations for temperatures of the last 120 years taken from ground-based measuring facilities. Critics of the man-made global warming theory have long been vocal that these measurements are distorted because the ground, and even more the urban ground where most of these measurements took place, is warmed considerably by human activities and cannot accurately represent atmospheric conditions.

"Much of the current global warming fear has been driven by Hansen's pronouncements, and he routinely claims to have been censored by the Bush administration for his views on warming. Now that NASA, without fanfare, has cleaned up his mess, Hansen has been silent -- I guess we can chalk this up to self-censorship," said Burnett.

Critics of the man-made global warming theory, including a growing number of scientists who either feared to speak before or else have had to change their opinions in the wake of new and mounting data, have been growing more vocal in recent months. These critics have railed against the perpetuated notion, which they say is the darling of the media, that there is any scientific consensus on what is driving climate change.

It turns out there are plenty of scientists and researchers who are far more interested in solar dynamics as an explanation than they are in human-caused carbon dioxide or methane emissions, which they say are so relatively minute that they cannot possibly make a difference on the grand scale of the planetary atmosphere. What's more, they point out, only one-half of the glob is experiencing any warming, and that is only taking place in large but isolated pockets.

The critics of the "panic mongering", as they call it, say that there has been rampant statistical manipulation and faulty computer modeling that only reflects the modeling principle of "garbage in, garage out".

Source:
National Center for Policy Analysis (PR Newswire), "NASA Backtracks on 1998 Warmest Year Claim"

Published by Brant McLaughlin

I am a Writer with a broad background and a vast vision.   View profile

9 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Tired of Armchair "Experts" 1/28/2010

    I clicked on the "Was This Helpful?" button about this article. I was going to say "No," because the tone of this article is so ridiculously biased that I do not, in fact, find it at all helpful. But instead of asking me for a "Yes" or "No" input, it ASSUMED that just by clicking on the QUESTION that I was answering yes! This is as bad as the denialists themselves. So all of the "Yes" votes are a sham -- I bet a lot of those people were trying to say no, but couldn't.

  • Fix it Man 1/6/2010

    Lets end this once and for all. The earth has been warming since the last Ice Age. Where was all of the scare tacticts when the polar ice started to receede from Europe.

    There will always be Global Warming and Global Cooling. It is just the way it is. All we have to do now is live with it.

  • Anon 12/8/2009

    1934 was the warmest year on record in the United States. What is far more relevant is what the warmest year for the world was.

    For a more balanced look at climate change, including some of the science underlying it, without all the hype, see here

  • willis burns 12/5/2009

    Let's all get together and have a final
    burial for global warming. Algore must go to cofession 60 days to make amends.
    let's get on with our lives and keep the kooks in their place

  • Steve 12/1/2009

    "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it"
    -- Upton Sinclair

  • Peter 11/28/2009

    PEOPLE, THIS ARTICLE SHOWS THAT THE RECORD 1935 TEMP WAS ONLY FOR A REGION OF THE UNITED STATES AND NOT GLOBAL TEMPERATURES. This past decade has been the absolute warmest on record GLOBALLY. And the ice caps are NOT cooling, they're warming much more rapidly than the rest of the world (which is proof that it's a greenhouse effect and not something like solar-output). The arctic will be ice-free by the summers of 2020. THIS IS NOT A NATURAL CYCLE.

  • Brant McLaughlin 8/29/2007

    Hi Clementine - nope, the I.R. ain't got nothin' to do with it. No man-made activity has anything to do with global climate change, which in the Southern Hemisphere is actually resulting in cooling instead of warming. But it's been pointed out by some top scientists that if the warming in the Northern Hemisphere keeps going, eventually the Sahara will become as it once was--a lush, green, wet place. Think of the boon for agriculture!

  • Clementine 8/29/2007

    Very interesting, although I suppose they could argue that this rise was due to the Industrial Revolution (which probably had more of an impact than what we are doing currently).

    It's funny how a "consensus" is suddenly scientific fact according to some people.

  • Brant McLaughlin 8/15/2007

    Jeff--

    You are teh one who should be ashamed of himself, for falling for FALSE SCIENCE.

    Get over your political jibberish. This is a matter of science and the FACTS, not a matter of your obviously hidden agenda.

    Grow up and face the music.

    This is NASA, you idiot, not ExxonMobile's little 2% budgetary contribution. You actually trust Al Gore?


Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.