The alleged purpose of the State is to protect We The People from external threats-and we hear this from politicians and other statist apologists all the time. But in practice, it is We The People have protected We The People.
The folks on the plane shut down the threat, while the State failed. It's people who work at their jobs at Wal-Mart or Kinko's, it's the regular folks who go down to the border themselves when the Federal State fails to do so; it's We The People, and not the State. We see this evidenced in cities where the private class is disarmed by the ruling class, and then crime goes up. We The People are our own defense.
The fallacy of the State's duty to defend you and me isn't just exposed in the failure of government to do so; the Federal Government itself has stated that it doesn't see itself as duty-bound to protect us. Regardless of what pandering politicians might say, the Supreme Court has stated as far back as 1856 that "there is no Constitutional right to be protected by the state against being murdered by criminals or madmen."
This statement has been repeated by ruling after ruling since then. As recently as 2005, the Supreme Court has repeated that there is no Constitutional right to be defended by Government. Knowing that the Government itself believes that it has no Constitutional duty to defend us, why the hell do we keep giving them more power with the assumption that it will protect life?
Time and time again, the entire system has proven itself to be entirely against protection of life. So why do we need them? As we realize that we don't need them, we need to be aware. We in the private class can do anything that the political class can do; and we can do it better, more efficiently, and without resorting to institutionalized theft and violence-unlike the State.
But as Ron Paul often points out, government hates competition. And the politicians hate looking bad. They must know that more and more private citizens are viewing them as increasingly irrelevant, burdensome, and obsolete.
Already the Political Class has gone into damage control mode. President Obama is already stating that the system put in place before him is faulty. (In other words, some of them are still blaming Bush.) The news as of Dec 31 had some interesting headlines, including "TSA subpoenas bloggers, demands names of sources" and "Flight 253 passenger Kurt Haskell: 'I was visited by the FBI'...Fears cover-up."
Of course all the political class is accomplishing in the end is helping us libertarians prove our point. When they fail at covering up their mistakes, they are blaming everyone of their error, even private citizens.
We would do well to recall that the failure of government on 9/11 resulted in no-one getting fired. Some people got promoted, and an entire new layer of government bureaucracy was created. While the Market rewards only success, the State rewards failure.
It's the private class stopping the bad guys. It's the private class scrutinizing the fools government has been lifting up into high positions. It's the private class struggling beneath a tyranny of incompetence. And it is the private class stating aloud, "We don't need the rulers of Versailles DC!"
What we have is largely a tyranny of incompetence; but it is tyranny nonetheless. When We The People faced with tyranny over 200 years ago, step one was to stop funding them. This is being done today, and in increasing numbers this very moment. Step two is to implement a New Great Experiment-also being done at this moment.
Just in the past 24 months, I have personally heard and seen people publicly proclaiming that they are "going Galt" or stating openly "Agora! Anarchy! Action!" I've seen this with my own eyes, for example, in a massive demonstration here in Grand Rapids, Michigan in April of 2009. I expect to see it again and again.
Defunding the tyranny. An end to the Federal State. This is real hope. This is lasting and sincere change. We will have liberty in our lifetime, and true security for future generations.
Published by D.E. Paine
Husband, father, writer, nerd. View profile
- National SecurityA brief overview into what National Security really is, and if we really need it...
Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Late Term AbortionThe Supreme court ruling banning partial-birth abortions made on April 18, 2007.- Michigan State Supreme Court Election: Cliff Taylor Versus Donna Marie HathawayCliff Taylor, Michigan Supreme Court Chief Justice, presides over a conservative "Gang of Four" or "Engler Four."
- NC Supreme Court Rules Doctors Can Participate in ExecutionsThe NC Supreme Court ruled Friday that the state Medical Board can not prevent doctors from participating in the executions of criminals. The decision split the court's members along gender lines.
- Top 7 California Supreme Court Cases on MesotheliomaAsbestos-related litigation, including mestothelioma cases, are frequently argued to the highest court of any state's jurisdiction. Here is a summary of the the 7 cases that have reached the California Supreme Court.
- Bush's Final Interviews Warn of National Security Threat
- An Example of the Failure of Government Insurance, from Personal Experience
- California Prop 8 Decision Comes in from California Supreme Court
- Savana Redding Strip Search is Unconstitutional, Supreme Court Rules
- The Supreme Court and Federalism
- Supreme Court Appointments Key in Coming Administration
- Supreme Court Attorney Adresses Hot Button Issue
- The alleged purpose of the State is to protect We The People from external threats.
- But the Supreme Court has ruled that we have "no Constitutional right to be protected."
- What we have is largely a tyranny of incompetence; but it is tyranny nonetheless.


