As some of you may know, the NBA players union has filed an "unfair labor practice" lawsuit, against the NBA. Meeting with players from 20 teams and coming to the conclusion that basically, this new ball sucks and this zero tolerance policy sucks. And from my point of view, they have a point. The league's decision to use the new ball not only seems pointless, but insensitive to the fact that, they aren't the ones playing basketball out there. They should' t just start using a new ball because Spalding told them so. Maybe they should have done a real test with players in the NBA, and found out if this was the right thing to do.
Players have been quoted as saying the ball is "too sticky","too heavy", "horrible when wet".
Jason Kidd has even been quoted on saying that the ball "gives him cuts every game"
Whatever they have been, most of the players haven't been very positive with it, and they are who matter right? Well I guess that's not how the league sees it, because David Stern said a week before the season started, "Like it or not, the new ball is staying". That's why this commissioner thing with him, has gotten out of hand, but that's another story.
The League's other major change this year, was it's crackdown on "player whining". Okay concept? Yes. Horribly executed? Yes? Now I could care less about the NBA wanting to stop some of the player whining because of players like Rasheed Wallace who complain on ever play when they are called for something, but this has gotten out of hand. The NBA has been calling technical fouls for showing too much emotion during the game.
This is an emotional game, and taking the emotion out of it, doesn't make the league look better, it just makes them look like a bullies who like to blow their whistles to show how much power they have over the players. A notable changes is that players can't throw the ball or hit their hands against the padding on the back part of the court anymore when they are angry at a call. They now just have to stand there like robots and act like nothing happened, because if they don't, they are at risk of being called for a tech.
Rasheed Wallace has dubbed this policy "the Rasheed Wallace rule" refering to how he regularly gets technical fouls during the season. The NBA doesn't see it that way, they don't even consider it a "zero tolerance policy", that's just what what various news outlets have nammed it. It sure has looked like a "zero tolerance" policy though.
What the league has done with the technical fouls wouldn't be so big of a deal if they didn't have so much of an effect on the game. It's much easier to get ejected now, as superstar players such as Carmelo Anthony, have been given their second tech and the ejection for things as little as throwing their headband out of bounds towards their bench. Note in no way into the stands. And since a technical foul is giving an almost automatic point to the other team, when referees call them religiously, when they really aren't even warranted, they are effecting the game, in too much of way.
The Knicks, who are leading the league with 19 technical fouls right now, have more then the Wizards who only had 18 all last season. This may not seem like a big stat now, but we aren't even 25% done with this season yet and the Knicks are already on pace to get half of the technical fouls they had last year altogether which was 51. Proof that this has just gotten out of hand.
Now I'm not going to take from the fact that it has gotten better over the last couple weeks during the NBA season, but it still isn't at the level it should be. I should be able to watch some emotion-filled NBA basketball without there being a lot of technical fouls during the course of the game.
Hopefully, the league will change the ball back, it should be the player's choice, not the leagues, they are the people who have to play with it every game, and multiple practices a week. I think most people are all for stopping some of Rasheed Wallace's and Dwyane Wade's constant whining, but the fans love drama, and emotion, so the league is only doing themselves a disservice, by their "zero tolerance" policy. Maybe if the league stopped worrying about things like what ball to use, how the players are dressed on the sidelines, and how much players complain, they would start to work on the real problems the NBA has. A new ball should be the farthest from the NBA's mind when there was nothing wrong with the old one, especially when there are problems with the NBA's officiating and foul calling, which should be their real concerns.
Published by Steve
Just living life. View profile
- Looking Back to Go Forward: NBA Drafts from 1995-2004: Their Repercussions (Part 2)We will be taking a look back at the last 10 NBA drafts, with analysis of the draft picks. Along with analysis, there will be a reordered top ten picks, along with a selection of the worst and best draft choices.
- 2003 NBA Draft Report Cards (Picks 21-29 and Select 2nd Round Breakouts)From LeBron to Glyniadakis, and everyone in between, one of the best draft classes of the last 5 years has been in the NBA for three seasons. It's an appropriate time for their first report cards.
- Reserves Named for the NBA All-Star Game 2007Last night the NBA announced it's reserve players for the Eastern and Western Conference teams in the NBA All Star Game 2007. The announcement was made live on TNT.
- Looking Back to Go Forward: NBA Drafts from 1995-2005 (Part 1)We will be taking a look back at the last 10 years of NBA drafts, with analysis of the draft picks. Along with analysis, there will be a reordered top ten picks, along with a selection of the worst and best draft cho...
The NBA Draft 2007: Losers Win?NBA teams that don't make the playoffs get a better chance of drafting good college players. Is this fair to the fans?
- New Game Ball for NBA Basketball - Why?
- Potential is a Dangerous Word as NBA Draft Approaches
- Going to the NBA All Star Game in Vegas?
- Radical Rule: Stern Wants NBA Players to Stop Complaining
- NBA 2k7 - XBox 360 Review
- NBA Preview 2006-07: Central Division
- NBA Europe to Introduce Murbasketderball in 2007
- The New Ball was pointless, why bring a new one if the old one was fine?
- The NBA's Crackdown on player complaining, while a good concept, was taken to far.
- The NBA should be worrying about more important issues, like the actual game.





1 Comments
Post a CommentRasheed Wallace does argue a lot of calls, but if you look at the ones he argues, you will find he is right more than half of the time, and he is a target for the refs. The NBA has said before that the officials favor league veterans, yet Rasheed who has played more than 10 seasons in the NBA is never given the benefit of the doubt. He is not the only player who has this problem, but he is probably the most vocal about it. Really when you look at it the NBA says it wants to have good cohesive teams, but whenever you do have a good team that doesn't have a "superstar" play a team that does have them, far more fouls go against the good team, and almost none go against the star player. Way to have a double standard. The NBA officals have been quoted in the media saying the "Rasheed Wallace Rule" is mostly put into place because of the Pistons, sounds again like they are targeting a good team without the superstars. I find it a travesty that Rip Hamilton can get mugged in the lane an