New British Prime Minister Needs to Consider What is Best for the Country

Queen Elizabeth II Needs a Regent

Keith Ljunghammar
What is Best for the Country?

This is always a continual search of thought and thinking for not only each generation but for past decades and centuries. Each generation has to grapple with this perplexing question and the answer they give will and does determine the forces of good or evil of the country for generations and generations.

How will the current alliance affect this question?

In 1215 the Magna Carta (1) was written to unify and build with strength thru unity of this country. Even just after this writing did the initial and subsequent generation eliminate and change some of its building blocks or precedence. Today, as you are aware, but only three of the original sections are remaining. This was not distasteful to that generate but neither did they really realize the long-term implications which they had forged into the fabric of our current society and into the foundations of other countries governing bodies documents. For this basic foundation as our fabric which was caste then so now for our next eight hundred years the foundation for future generations must be equally considered as to how the current foundation will be strengthened and carried to the generations eight hundred years from now. Our continual question thus must be: What is Best for the Country?

Another disturbance of character was created later in the seventeenth century with respect for the Crown. The final solution was in May, 1606 with the Popish Recusant Act(2). Or was it rather just the start of hostilities and has continued today? Reconsideration of this Act is now under consideration by Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. She is forcing a meeting on September 16, 2010 with Pope Benedict. The meeting is a direct affront to the Popish Recusant Act. More profoundly the realization of the reason for the Act in the first place has not been "Absolved". Not having the Holy Bible in a correct interpretative format but insisting on Papal Control should still be an abomination to England and to God. This still does continue today and with due respect for Her Majesty this looks as to be continued for possibly another 400 years if not for forever. Does God have this much tolerance. Should England have this much tolerance. What is Best for the Country?

The Act of Union 1707 (3) was supposed to forever solidify the House of Stuart with Scotland and England under Great Britain and under one line of Kings/Queens. Soon was this Act disparaged within two generations and the British Empire soon fell prey to usury. Usury was written to be "outlawry" even from the Magna Carta of 1215. Can a simple Act of brilliance be devastated with continual belligerence and contempt? Can the survival of the Country stand if foundations are quickly disintegrated. Continual ups and downs in the economy have happened since this time. Is it time to correct this past injustice? What is Best for the Country?

But once again during the Queen Victoria age did the economy flourish. Was this an Act of God or was this simply the brilliance of Queen Victoria and/or Prince Albert? Or was this due to God wanting to Bless the House of Stuart which also is from the House of David. God is forever and His promises are forever. Should not His Blessings go with the House of David? If this is the case then the corruption of the Magna Carta 1215 and the Act of Union 1707 has continued without "from the loins of the House of Stuart" being on the British throne for over one hundred and nine years. Or did the Blessing of the House of Stuart lapse with the passing of Prince Albert which has been short of one hundred forty-nine years. What is Best for the Country?

Queen Elizabeth II has been making overtures toward senility in some of her business workings and dealings with her chamber maids. Should walk-outs continue or be dealt with directly by Parliament in the future. What is Best for the Country? Appointing a Regent such as Patricia Johnson-Holm-Shupe who is of the House of Stuart and of the House of David and of the House of Hanover from Queen Victoria and Prince Albert descendency may be what the next quail pen writing should be about. An overseer of Queen Elizabeth II for the Countries best course and for Her Majesties best countenance should be implemented. If true to the House of Stuart and the House of David and the Blessings associated with these Houses then Great Britain should once again regain and continue her pride within the economies of the world. No harm, no foul. If this indeed does work all citizens of Britain will gain. If not, then no citizen of Great Britain will lose. What is Best for the Country?

Forging alliances with the opposite political party is indeed part of the fabric of the British Constitution. But the forging of Alliances with God's Blessings should never be dishonored? Your political decision on unity with the opposite political force is your political future. But let God forge all of your political futures by honoring His Blessings. What is Best for the Country?

Sources:

1) Magna Carta 1215
http://www.constitution.org/eng/magnacar.htm

2) Popish Recusant Act, May, 1606
http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.aspx?compid=15006
http://www.sourcetext.com/sourcebook/library/bowen/16hackney.htm
http://catholicity.elcore.net/MacCaffrey/HCCRFR2_Chapter10.html

3) Act of Union 1707
http://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/Scotland-History/ActofUnion.htm

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.