A major complaint of the old video iPods was that the screens were too small to watch television shows and movies on. The touch-screen iPod would remove that problem by effectively doubling the size of the screen by removing the navigation dial currently operating the space.
One of the major concerns with a touch-screen is the eventual damage the interaction will cause to the screen of iPods. For media devices commonly used for both video viewing and music listening, screen damage is a big deal. Apple has, seemingly, put these fears to rest, however, with their latest blueprint for the new iPod. The "touch-screen" portion of the new iPod will actually be located on the back of the device.
While this may seem counter-intuitive at first glance, it actually is an ingenious way to solve all the problematic issues with a touch-screen iPod. Touching the back of the iPod will bring up one of several tools onto the LCD screen (which will now cover the entire front of the iPod); the signature navigation dial, a keyboard to search through files, and/or a menu.
In effect, this system allows users to have a touch-screen iPod without ever having to actually touch the most delicate part of their expensive music player. The pure innovation of this new design showcases the genius of the Apple employees working to develop the new addition to the popular family of mp3 players.
Of course, there is still no real word on when the new iPod will be released or even what it officially looks like. The descriptions mentioned above refer to patent designs taken out by Apple in recent history. Still, fans of Apple products have to be excited about this news as it points to an earlier release of the new iPod than expected.
Source: http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/07/05/10/apple_filing_reveals_multi_sided_ipod_with_touch_screen_interface.html
Published by Ankur Amin
I am a college student who loves to watch, talk and write about sports. My favorite teams are based in Detroit, but I try my best to say unbiased. View profile
Sony's New Rolling Music PlayerSony has unveiled its brand new music player which deviates from the design of current music players. Dubbed as the "Rolly", Sony's brand new egg-shaped digital music player spo...- Remove New Music Player and Move Up Interest Section for MyspaceUse this code to hide the new music player on MySpace.
Free Music for the Masses with the Muziic Music Player and YouTube!The Muziic YouTube Music Player allows you to legally play free music on your computer.- How To Find Touch Screen MP3 PlayersThis article talks about how to find a touch screen MP3 player.
- Touch Screen PhonesTouch screen phones overview. Also briefing about various market leaders in touch screen technology.
- The Philips Streamium Music Player: Play Music Anywhere in the House
- Beep Media Player (BMPx) a Fantastic Music Player for Linux
- ToolPlayer - a Simple, Powerful, Compact Music Player for Mac
- How to Hide Your MySpace Music Player
- Product Review of RCA Pearl TH11 Music Player
- Review: Cowon IAudio X5L (30 GB) Music Player
- How to Change the Look of the New Myspace Music Player


3 Comments
Post a CommentAll great points Brian and I think Apple will certainly have to answer those issues. One thing is for sure, however, and that is that the company has always delivered a quality product with their iPods in the past. I'm confident that they'll do the same again here.
Still seems like it won't work unless the surface is more resilient to damage. I've had my Video IPod in a good case since the day I bought it and the face of it is still damaged. Also, what kind of case would work with a double-faced ipod? Clear plastic is no good over the face, as my wheel doesn't work that great when it's in the carrying case that I have. So that means no cases? I hope they have planned for a quick and cheap face replacement. Or I guess that means you just won't be able to have a case that you can keep the ipod in when you want to use it. And also, with two displays and larger screen video playback, I hope they put a better battery in it.
You've answered one of my questions. Thanks!