Very low environmental emissions lift nuclear energy onto a very abstract platform of environmental debate. Catastrophes such as the Ukrainian Chernobyl accident, the Pennsylvanian Three Mile Island incident, and the Japanese incident raise obvious concerns over radiation exposure and possible human death; however, these incidents should do more to raise concerns over our ability to manage these plants over the long term.
While the science behind nuclear technology is nothing less than impressive, no one knows what to do with nuclear waste. Our methods of dealing with spent fuel rods are only temporary, as we have thousands of years before the slow decay of the radioactive material would reach a safe point of contact with life. Considering such decay, can we assert that creatures will not be affected by our waste in 6000 years (www.nuclear-news.net)?
The Japanese catastrophe should open up yet another question: what happens when major natural disasters affect our nuclear waste vessels? The website WhatisNuclear.com explains that "nuclear waste is highly radioactive, and remains so for thousands of years. When it first comes out of the reactor, it is so toxic that if you stood within a few meters of it while it was unshielded, you would receive a lethal radioactive dose within a few seconds and would die of acute radiation sickness [Wikipedia] within a few days."
According to Scientific American, nuclear waste in the United States is stored near the facilities that have generated the waste. You can view a map of nuclear power reactor sites at the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Website, www.nrc.gov .
Published by Devrie Wise
Devrie is a veteran Navy weather forecaster who's written weather articles for small base papers. As a Family Service Specialist, she's helped low-income families decrease their energy costs through educati... View profile
- Energizing the Future: Nuclear EnergyNuclear energy is the way of the future. Find out why and how it will work in this article.
- Clean Energy Stalled by Old MoneyAmerica's clean energy problem is less a matter of technology than political agendas. Any alternative sources that require fossil fuels in their produciton or operation are not alternatives at all.
- Native Americans of Minnesota Want Nuclear Waste Puzzle Solved Before New Era of N..."Solve the waste disposal problem and move the nation's nuclear waste to a safe and secure facility."
- Nuclear Energy - a Clean Way ForwardA discussion of a new and revolutionary form of nuclear energy, and its possible implications on the world at large, as petroleum supplies continue to dwindle and the environment effects of fossil fuels become increas...
Nuclear Power in AmericaWhy should we attempt to expand our base of nuclear power plants now, especially after seeing the catastrophe at Chernobyl in 1986?
- Vermont Yankee - is Nuclear Power Really Clean Energy?
- Disadvantages of Nuclear Energy
- Nuclear Energy: Three Mile Island and the Future of Nuclear Energy
- The Recent Three Mile Island Accident Reopens the Nuclear Energy Debate
- Nuclear Energy: Contrasting Points of View
- Clean Energy News Update: Solar Power Creating New Jobs
- 10 Clean Energy Stocks for Aggressive Growth




