But now, Obama invokes Reagan's name in a clearly complimentary way while taking a shot at President Clinton and Sen. Clinton:
"Ronald Reagan changed the trajectory of America in a way that Richard Nixon did not, and a way that Bill Clinton did not," Obama said. "We want clarity, we want optimism, we want a return to that sense of dynamism and entrepreneurship that had been missing."
The campaign has back tracked the comment by saying the Senator was merely referring to the kind of movement campaign that vaulted Reagan to the White House:
"Sen. Obama was talking about the way President Reagan, for better or for worse, tapped into the mood of the electorate and changed the political landscape," Obama spokesman Tommy Vietor has said. "That doesn't change the fact that Sen. Obama strongly disagreed with a lot of what Reagan did."
If that were the case, then why in 2003, as an Illinois state senator, Obama joined almost all of his colleagues in co-sponsoring legislation that would have marked Feb. 6 as "Ronald Reagan Day" in Illinois, the state in which Reagan was born? For many in America, the Reagan legacy invokes memories of poverty, deficits, and broken schools. Democratic voters should be wary of voting for someone who calls Reagan a hero and a beacon of hope. For most democrats, that person was Bill Clinton in both 1992, and 1996. It is troubling to hear a democratic candidate invoke a republican president who lost millions of jobs, raked up record deficits, and increased poverty, over a democratic president who worked for eight years to clean up the "Reagan Mess". It begs the question whether Obama would really be a Democratic president, or just another president who promises one thing, and delivers something else. This is a real concern voters must have about this young junior senator. The next president will be counted upon to clean up the "Bush Mess", not expand it.
Published by cantor
Im a college student spending his time over the summer in florida paradise, and havin a great chill time. My career goals are in microfinance and public policy, and love a good campaign. ~*j.k.livin everyone! View profile
Are Barack Obama's Fifteen Minutes Up?The negatives for Barack Obama are starting to pile up. His radical liberal record. His flip-flopping. His lack of understanding foreign policy. His willingness to go beggin...- Unlocking the Puzzle: Ronald Reagan's Belief of a Divine PurposeRonald Reagan believed that there was a Divine Purpose planned for his life. He believed he was put into his position to fight the evils of Communism.
- Franklin Roosevelt Versus Ronald Reagan and the American HeritageG. Stolyarov II contrasts the ideas on government present in Franklin D. Roosevelt's 1932 "Commonwealth Club Address" and Ronald Reagan's First Inaugural Address. He argues that Reagan's views more closely reflect the...
- The Myth of GOP Toughness on Terrorism: Starting with Ronald Reagan and George H.W...Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush's dad sold weapons to the same Iranians that Bush is rattling his sabers against. They also tried to get car bombers released from jail. This is being tough on terror?
- A Short Biography on Ronald ReaganRonald Reagan would probably be considered one of the most popular presidents in history.
- Barack Obama and the Youth Vote
- What Race is Barack Obama? Barack Obama Age? Barack Obama Religion?
- The Reasonable Barack Obama
- Barack Obama Galvanized Music Lovers into Change Agents
- Majority of Americans Would Not Vote for Barack Obama
- Fact Check on Barack Obama's Money
- It's Official: Sen. Barack Obama Joins White House Race



1 Comments
Post a CommentI would agree that invoking the name of Ronald Reagan was not a good idea. Remember the Iran-contra affair. Also, Reagan's blatant disregard of the environment. There was a lot of corruption that took place during his administration.