Obama Approves Embryonic Stem Cell Research
Removal of Bush Era Restrictions Raises Moral and Ethical Questions
Embryonic stem cell research involves the destruction of embryos to create stem cells, tissue that can develop into any kind of tissue in the human body. If one considers oneself pro life to the extent that one believes that human life begins at conception, then it would follow that this kind of research is ethically suspect at best, morally reprehensible at worse. Embryonic stem cell research could no more be allowed than research that involves the destruction of living human beings.
If one is not pro life or does not believe that human life begins at conception, however, then the Bush era restrictions on stem cell research are silly, based on a superstition. Promising lines of research are being closed off, so this view maintains, for no good reason.
Clearly President Barack Obama has come down on the latter side. However, because of the Congressional restrictions placed on stem cell research under the Dickey-Wicker Amendment, federal funding cannot be used for the actual destruction of embryos to create stem cells. That part of the process still has to be funded with private money. With Democratic majorities in the Congress, that restriction may be also overturned.
Contrary to some popular belief, the Bush administration did not ban stem cell research. The August, 2001 restrictions allocated federal dollars to the embryonic stem cell lines that then existed, somewhere between twenty and seventy some estimate. Private funding for embryonic stem cell research was still allowed and full federal funding was allowed for adult stem cell research.
It has been the view of those supporting embryonic stem cell research, however, that the Bush era restrictions had closed off promising research, forestalling potential miracle cures for ailments ranging from spinal cord injuries to diabetes. Complicating that view has been news of recent advances in adult stem cell research, which has suggested that cells taken from an adult human being, without killing anyone, can be made to develop into a stem cell. The ethical and moral problems with embryonic stem cell research are therefore avoided.
Also, the promised miracle cures, while mind blowing in their implications, are likely years, if not decades in the future. The pain staking nature of science research and the bureaucratic approval procedures imposed by the federal government all but guarantee that.
Nevertheless, by the stroke of a pen, President Barack Obama has now opened up embryonic stem cell research for federal funding. That does not mean that the debate is over or that the controversy has been put to rest.
There is one other question, left unanswered. Will federal dollars allocated to stem cell research expand to cover newly permitted embryonic stem cell research? Or will money be taken away from adult stem cell research to fund embryonic stem cell research. That is a question that begs clarification.
Sources: Obama Is Leaving Some Stem Cell Issues to Congress, Sheryl Gay Stolberg, New York Times, March 9th, 2009
Trading Places, Joseph Bottum, Wall Street Journal, November 28th, 2007
Published by Mark Whittington
Mark R. Whittington is a writer residing in Houston, Texas. He is the author of The Last Moonwalker, Children of Apollo, Dark Sanction, and Nocturne. He has written numerous articles, some for the Washington... View profile
- Heart Valve, Sperm Cells Grown from Adult Stem Cells, Diabetes Treatment Tested With less chance of transplant rejection, adult stem cells are being used in a number of promising projects to produce organs and cells to treat difficult medical conditions.
- Embryonic Stem Cells Why embryonic stem cells are less effective then aduklt stem cells.
- Stem Cell Research & the Effect on Voting and Political Decisions American voters, when choosing a political candidate, may have the impact to determine whether or not stem cell research is funded by the government in the next decade.
- Cloner of Dolly the Sheep Now Supports Adult Stem Cell Use Over Embryonic Stem Cel... The scientific stem cell leader who cloned the famous sheep named Dolly has been an ardent proponent of the use of embryonic stem cells. Last week, Ian Wilmut made the announcement that he now favors the use of adult...
- Adult Stem Cells Could End the Ethical Debate Research has shown that adult stem cells may be as effective as embryonic stem cells, and do not require killing the donor to harvest them.
- Embryonic Stem Cells Vs. Adult Stem Cells
- An Argument for the Use of Adult Stem-Cells
- The Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2005: Still Stalled in the U.S. Senate
- New Stem Cell Research Advancements: The Dream of Christopher Reeve Grows Closer
- Bush Issues First Ever Veto, to the Disappointment of Stem Cell Research Advocates
- In Favor of Stem Cell Research
- Missouri Voters to Decide Stem-cell Research Future
|
|
- 10 things you need to know today: February 11, 2012 (The Week)
- Grammy Awards preview: Top 5 reasons to watch (The Week)
- No Fun Allowed: L.A. Beaches Ban Footballs, Frisbees, and Sand Digging (ContributorNetwork)
- Good day, bad day: February 10, 2012 (The Week)
- Obama's birth control compromise: 'Still unacceptable'? (The Week)
3 Comments
Post a CommentLife really begins when the dog dies and the kids finally move out.
I am totally against stem cell research. Life begins at the time of conception, God blesses us in many ways you are either born healthy or born with disease, deformity or stillborn etc. Funding should not be given to this research 1 person MAY benefit; but those amazing eggs are humans so producing 1,000 eggs = killing 1,000 unborn humans. So can MY TAX dollars go to another research...like putting prayer and the pledge of alligence back in the school systems??? Go back to your sex ed. class and learn when life begins. God is prolife
This is horrible. Women will be selling their eggs for research (more than ever) because federal funds, our tax dollars, will be paying for them. Life beigns at conception, and these embryos will be murdered in the HOPES that a cure for a disease MAY be found.