I was 14 years old then. Now that I am much older, and possibly wiser, my interest moved toward NASA once again when Barack Obama was elected President and I wondered what he would do with the agency. There have been many articles written on how Obama has steered NASA in the wrong direction and has changed their mission to the point where NASA is no longer "on mission" as they once were. I am definitely not a fan of Obama's policies regarding the economy but when it concerns his direction for the space program I have no choice but to defend him and his plan.
NASA has never been completely about space travel. Going to the moon and other planets are great things that must be accomplished but NASA and it's vendors have always been on the forefront of technological development. The technology that is developed to complete missions assigned to the agency have brought the world many inventions that have been used in a large number of industrial applications critical here on Earth. A lot of these inventions, many payed for by the tax payer's dollar, have been given freely to be used by anyone that has an application for them. All of the sciences have benefited from this. From the other side, NASA has always encouraged scientists and industry outside the agency to share their technology and to ask for help for development of what they may need to move technology forward. This two way transfer is a great thing and it is what Obama is trying to encourage and accelerate.
With NASA Administrator Charles Bolden's appointment of Dr. Robert Braun to the post of Chief Technologist of NASA this program of technology development and transfer got a booster shot. According to Dr. Braun the cancellation of the Constellation program was a good thing. It was mostly about sending humans back to the moon. Now the emphasis is trying to understand more about humans being in space, developing better propulsion systems and infrastructure so that multiple missions in space will be possible in the future with a greater success rate and move us much further that would have been possible by continuing in the previous direction. At the same time, the U.S. economy would be helped with the activity created by this new direction.
Obama deserves the credit for getting it right with this new direction and gives me hope that America may continue to lead the world in the sciences and we, as Americans, can once again feel the same as many of us did on that hot July day 41 years ago.
Charles F. Bolden, Jr. "NASA Internal memo: Message from the NASA Administrator: Feb. 3, 2010." SpaceRef
Various, "NASA Tech Briefs." Tech Briefs
NASA Tech Briefs, "NASA's Chief Technologist Leads the Agency's New Focus on Research and Innovation." Embedded Technology
Published by Dave Bryan
Born without consent. View profile
- Space Travel for Rich Tourists?After several exceedingly wealthy individuals have gone for "space vacations," it seems that an industry will develop providing space travel to the rich.
- The Future of Space TravelThe future of humanity is dependent on space travel.
- Unique Insurance Protection Against Risk & Loss: Protecting Space Travel & Explora...For companies that pursue space travel or space exploration, insurance protection is necessary to safeguard against rare events, including those damages to a third party.
NASA's Charles Bolden Wants to Help Muslims "feel Good About Their Histo...NASA's Administrator Charles Bolden is raising eyebrows and blood pressures with a statement he made on Al Jazeera television recently concerning one of the things that Presiden...
Scott Gration to Be NASA Administrator, Report SuggestsRetired Major General Scott Gration has reportedly been picked to be NASA Administrator. Gration's experience in space matters consists of a year as a White House fellow working...
- Charles Bolden Nominated as NASA Administrator
- Charles Bolden Confirmed as NASA Administrator
- Mike Griffin on Charles Bolden, NASA, and the Proper Use of Diplomacy and Space Ex...
- Are Charles Bolden's Days as NASA Administrator Numbered?
- Barack Obama's Search for a NASA Administrator, Part Two
- Does Obama Have a Problem at NASA?
- Book Review: Dark Side of the Moon





2 Comments
Post a CommentAs an engineer, I'd agree with Mark that it helps to have a specific mission in mind, e.g. design a module to land on the moon, as opposed to something more vague, e.g. improve this technology. Engineers like to solve problems, so give them specific goals and the by-products will naturally occur (e.g. Velcro.) The goal itself is perhaps not so important as the fact that there IS a goal.
I'm not sure how this proves the case that Obamaspace was anything but a disaster, both politically and policy wise. The author is correct that technology development has been often neglected at NASA and a strong program should be funded. But without any missions to justify such a program--say going back to the Moon--such a program would remain vague and unfocused. It would also be a prime target for Congressional budget cutters.