The man is well spoken and his presence is impressive. If he had been around in politics longer I might take a second look but he has too many answers for someone so new to the political arena. What is amazing is that people think that his get tough on Washington and its special interests are something new. The Washington Post said that Obama condemned the power of special interests. Obama went on to say that that those representing the American public needed a change of attitude.
It is unfortunate that memories are so short. Every candidate for president in the past thirty years has used that same refrain; time to change the way business is done in Washington. And, every president has failed to make any change-it continues to be business as usual. When the Republicans controlled the Congress and the White House, no real changes were made. Now the Democrats control Congress and there are no real changes. We heard the same promises from Reagan, Bush I, Clinton, Bush II and we are hearing it again.
The basic premise on the part of Obama and his predecessors are wrong. There will always be special interests and to say that you are going to do away with their influence is naïve and is contrary to American politics 101. To say that we need a change in the attitudes of those representing Americans is only partially correct. Elected officials in Washington merely reflect the mirror image of the American public. That image is one of apathy, confusion, lack of conviction and it lacks direction. The American public does not know what it wants and is trying to get someone to tell them what they should do and how they should think. They feel that life has gotten so complex and the issues so confusing that they have abrogated responsibility for almost every aspect of their lives to Washington. As long as that hold true, Washington will continue to be the battleground for competing special interests and the promises of candidates to change this are simply wishful thinking. After all, how are their campaigns funded?
While Obama puts on a good show, I cannot help but wonder who is behind the scenes of his campaign. If someone gives a pitch that is too good to be true, especially in politics, it raises red flags. The field of democratic candidates are not impressive, but it is probably a given they will win the White House in '08. Of course, they have been known to blow solid leads. If Hillary is nominated she would be wise not to choose Obama as VP. I am sure that there would be a lot of pressure to do that but it would be her undoing. Then we can watch Obama and see if he is a real politician or, just another Manchurian Candidate.
Published by Philip Harris
Born and raised in Massachusetts. Worked at every level of government. Co-author,WAKING GOD and author, A MAINE CHRISTMAS CAROL. National syndicated and featured writer, The American Chronicle, blogger. View profile
- Is the White House is Listening to Average Joes Across the Nation?When written in a respectful and appropriate manner, President Obama and the White House Staff are listing to the concerns of Americans and changing some things very quickly.
Pay Freeze for White House Salaries Marks Obama's First Day in the Oval...On Obama's First Day in office, he took the steps to issue a pay freeze. The pay freeze will affect White House salaries and put a basic cap on how much the White House staff ca...
The Evolution of Animals at the White House: From Menageries to Simpler...Just about every familiar animal you can name has occupied the White House grounds over the last 200+ years.
White House Introduces Its Version of Monopoly: Iraq-opolyIraqopoly is a joint effort between The White House and the Department of Defense.
Decorating Ideas for the Obama White HouseDecorators and speculators all over the net are guessing at how to decorate the White House. Some people are being quite irreverent about it, suggesting things believed to be ty...
- Barack Obama: The Jakarta Candidate
- McCain; The Manchurian Candidate
- Bankrupting America! Obama Says He Will "Bankrupt" the Coal Industry
- White House Easter Egg Roll Tickets Now Available Online
- Does the White House Dog Influence Breed Popularity?
- Stevie Wonder to Perform at White House
- Fergie Plays White House Easter Party
- Obama and the YouTube debate.
- Looks good, sounds good-too good?
- When will candidates face the real issues?


3 Comments
Post a CommentThis article says more about you, the writer, than about Obama. Since you lack any serious argument against him, you have decided to take the low road "there is something I do not trust about him" line. The analysis is symptomatic of the absence of serious issue analysis that we see every day in news media. Quite tragic!
Seems to me Hillary, Edwards, and Romney always need to have the "right answers", even if they said something contradictory not long before. I'm not aware that Obama has done the same, but even if he has it doesn't make him any worse than the others.
Thanks for announcing in advance who will win. I guess every other candidate should give up after reading your "insightful" treatise. It's amazing you consider Obama "not real," when one of the defining qualities he exudes when speaking one-on-one, to a small group, or a large audience is precisely being "real." He "has too many answers" and always the right ones? I hadn't noticed. What I DO notice is his willingness to give a sincere and direct answer - and it's not always what the audience wants to hear. Your cynical attitude is precisely what Obama describes as being one of the main problems in American society today. Your commentary suggests that you know little about Obama's experience - a common problem. On what basis do you consider Obama "untrustworthy"? Talk about prejudice and bias.