Obama is Not Spock

Mark Whittington
Maureen Dowd's latest column had the predictable expressions of both Bush Derangement Syndrome and Obama Worship Disorder. But at the end Ms. Dowd's screed had an incredible claim. Barack Obama is Mr. Spock.

"Speaking of the Enterprise, Mr. Obama has a bit of Mr. Spock in him (and not just the funny ears). He has a Vulcan-like logic and detachment. Any mere mortal who had to tell liberals that our obligations in Iraq and Afghanistan are far from over and tell Republicans that he has a $3.6 trillion budget would probably have tears running down his face."

One can just imagine the "real" Mr. Spock, raising his eyebrow in a kind of puzzlement, upon reading that paragraph. There is detachment in Mr. Obama, to be sure, but logic? Only by a tortured, north eastern liberal establishment definition of the same could what Mr. Obama is trying to do can be considered logical.

Obama's strategy in Iraq and Afghanistan makes sense, as it is just about the same as George W. Bush's. The only difference is that President Bush would not have announced in advance the date of an American withdraw from Iraq. It may not matter, as Al Qaeda is thoroughly whipped, no thanks to Barack Obama, but it is not a-er-logical strategy to tell one's opponent what one is going to do unless one's opponent can do nothing about it.

But the $3.6 trillion is about as far from logical as one can imagine. Barack Obama proposes to create at least three new massive government spending programs, tax the rich, cut back spending on military weapons in the middle of a war, and-here's the kicker-cut the deficit in half by four years. One can imagine Mr. Spock's reaction to that proposal.

Now does Barack Obama personally resemble Mr. Spock. The "logical and detachment" that Maureen Dowd perceives is simply the politician's skill of lying with a straight face. Mr. Spock was always brutally honest, even when it irritated his human compatriots.

Also Mr. Spock never aspired to be a leader or Captain of the Enterprise. He wanted to do his science research on the Enterprise, while entertaining himself by bantering with the likes of Dr. McCoy.

Mr. Spock's limitations as a leader were illustrated by an incident in the episode, The Corbomite Maneuver. When the all powerful aliens are about to obliterate the Enterprise, Spock informs Captain Kirk that they have run out of options. "Check mate," Spock suggests, using an allusion to his favorite Earth game.

Captain Kirk, of whom George W. Bush resembles in some respects, disagrees. Kirk has a favorite game to and it is called poker. Kirk proceeds to bluff the aliens by claiming that the Enterprise is equipped with something called "corbomite" that would destroy any attacker that tried to strike at the Enterprise. The bluff works and the Enterprise is saved.

Leadership is not just based on logic and detachment, but on gut instinct and the willingness to make decisions on limited information. If Spock had been in charge, he would still have been analyzing the situation until the Enterprise was destroyed. Kirk, on the other hand, played to his instinct, bluffed the aliens, and won the day. Even Spock recognized that there must be something to this game of poker.

Barack Obama is not Spock, not Jesus, not Lincoln, not John Kennedy, nor any of the many others his supporters try to compare him to. Obama is, for better or ill, just himself.

Sources: Spock at the Bridge, Maureen Dowd, New York Times, February 28th, 2009

Star Trek: The Corbomite Manuever, TV.Com

Published by Mark Whittington

Mark R. Whittington is a writer residing in Houston, Texas. He is the author of The Last Moonwalker, Children of Apollo, Dark Sanction, and Nocturne. He has written numerous articles, some for the Washington...  View profile

15 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Agnes Farside3/2/2009

    What an insult to Mr. Spock.

  • Agnes Farside3/2/2009

    What an insult to Mr. Spock.

  • carol gibson3/2/2009

    After watching 60 minutes last night, it looks like we'd better watch our own crime ridden cesspool fecundating at the southern border.

  • Drew Moore3/1/2009

    Also, why is the 3.6 trillion "as far from logical as one can imagine"? What would you prefer, no governmental action at all? Why don't we just dissolve the government and let everyone fend for themselves? Who needs courts of law, civil rights, or police departments and armed services? The Republican party line that government is bad and must always get smaller is what's illogical. Perhaps you should think your arguments through first before writing and then give at least a little evidence for them. Mindless rants (on both sides of the political spectrum) are a dime a dozen, and they will convince no one of anything.

  • Drew Moore3/1/2009

    It's interesting that you mock Obama's logic as something only a "tortured, north eastern liberal establishment" would appreciate (by the way, "northeastern" is one word) but then make your own arguments without backing them up with any reasoning. Right from the first paragraph, you are illogical; as you correctly quote, Maureen Down said "Obama has a bit" of Mr. Spock, not that he IS Mr. Spock.

  • P. Trembeth3/1/2009

    Good way to sneak in an Obama is a liar flat out at the end there. Nothing like slander in the USA.

  • Alexandra Villarreal3/1/2009

    Revise your fallacious arguments.

  • Alexandra Villarreal3/1/2009

    As a matter of fact, al-Qaeda is not "whipped." That was America's mistake going into Iraq & Afghanistan; al-Qaeda is a VAST and highly capable organization with networks interwoven throughout the world. To think and assume that they are beatable, that they can be "wiped out" is a gross miscalculation and a huge error in U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East. They will always exist, even if it is in small pockets. The goal is not to subdue or eradicate them, but to minimize their influence. Our statement to withdrawal is based on a solid opinion that is shared by many of the wider community of experts and scholars on the Middle East, that doing so is likely to appease the insurgency and decrease the violence, enabling us to withdrawal our troops faster and hand over military and policing operations to the Iraqis, which will be responsible for dealing with al-Qaeda after this point. Whether we announce our withdrawal or not, there will still be a withdrawal and al-Qaeda will be the res

  • Kaka Identifier3/1/2009

    Pseudointellectual slop.

  • Saying it like it is3/1/2009

    Your anti-Obama sentiments are characteristic of an incurable developmental disorder called, "Republicanism. No reason or argument will change your mind, so I hope no one tries. I suspect you inherited a faulty gene from one or both of your parents.
    As for Spock - that wasn't really your motivation for writing this - was it? Just an excuse to rag on the prospect of change.
    Sameness uber alles just isn't the ticket any longer.
    Wishing you all the best,,, or as 'best' as a right-wing nay sayer can hope to achieve.
    Disrespectfully but with true compassion for your inbred disorder, SILIS

Displaying Comments
Next »

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.