Obama and the Obstructionists

Age-old Politics at Work

Charles Shea LeMone

Although my parents both passed away nearly twenty years ago, ever since Barack Obama's presidential run began picking up momentum, I've wondered what my mother and father would have thought about the last three years.

During the dawning of the twentieth century, Charlie and Edna both grew up in the boroughs of New York and left school in their early teens to help their parents support siblings younger than themselves. They both faced racial disparity in the workforce and expected to be shunned by unions and paid less than whites doing the same work.

They also witnessed a NAACP march down Fifth Avenue in 1917 that included 10,000 black men, women and children, and saw the brute force of more than one race riot and were aware of countless other riots in cities all over the country, usually sparked by another all-too-common act of police brutality. They also saw the annual number of lynchings around the country go up during lean economic times. Because of this awareness early in their lives, they had to consider themselves part of the "Negro problem" in this melting pot known as the United States of America.

Furthermore, they both had relatives who fought in the Spanish American War, and in World War I, only to be denied basic citizenship rights after leaving the frontlines to return home to the Jim Crow South. They were also aware that a large percentage of Negroes "down home" could not vote, and that any of them daring to register might lose their jobs or lives, a situation that only began to be rectified in 1965.

They also saw the white-flight from the city of Philadelphia, where they finally bought a home during World War II, and experienced the property values in that neighborhood take a severe dive to the point where their proud home was not worth a dime twenty years after they signed a mortgage contract. But they already knew in order to assure surviving whatever economic downturns the future might bring, they would be tested and have to work hard and long hours, and count themselves blessed to have employment. Otherwise, how could they provide for me and my two sisters, and by example teach us the survival skills we'd need as adults?

I was ten years old when the harsh reality of the racist world shocked me during the summer of 1955. That's when I saw the infamous, nightmarish photograph on the cover of Jet magazine, which showed the battered, bruised, decomposed face of 14-year-old Emmett Till in his coffin.

Before putting him on a bus in Chicago to visit relatives in Mississippi, his mother, Mamie Till, warned her son to acquiesce to white southerners and not hesitate to get on his knees and bow to their power if the need arose.

Obviously, the child was too brash to heed his mother's warnings and was accused of whistling at a white woman. The woman's husband and half-brother drug Emmett from his uncle's house, demanding that he repent. They were later acquitted of beating and shooting him, and then tossing his mutilated body, bound to a cotton mill fan, into the Tallahatchie River.

Mamie Till chose to have an open-casket funeral, explaining, "So the world can see what they did to my boy."

Since that day, so many years ago, I know many reasons to believe that racism is still alive in the hearts of some. However, I have also met many whites whom I think of as brothers and sisters.

On one occasion when I was in high school, as part of the first influx of "Negroes" to attend the school, I brazenly cut in on a couple dancing at an all-white dance held at lunchtime. I was stunned when a number of white guys chose to fight beside me in the street later that day where a mob had gathered. It was those rough and ready white guys who became my best friends. How could I do anything but cherish the friendship I had with them when they willingly put themselves on the, seemingly, losing side of a battle because of what they believed was the right thing to do when they didn't even know my name?

All of this, and a long stream of memories surrounding the Civil Rights Movement of the 50s and 60s, were actively parading through my mind on August 27, 2008-fifty-three years to the day after the brutal murder of Emmett Till--when Barack Obama won the presidential nomination at the Democratic Convention.

But I am certain I was not alone wishing that my parents could have savored the victorious euphoria so many Americans, of all colors, experienced so deeply that day. Nevertheless, I am certain my parents would have been cautious-minded enough to realize that there would be backlash up the road for Obama to face. I also know they would not have been surprised by the alarming rise of hate groups in America; Sarah Palin-like talk about "taking back the country" and the vitriol spouted on right-wing radio and TV, and the oft-asked questions about Obama being a Muslim, and about the legitimacy of his birth certificate.

No, none of that would have surprised my parents if they had survived more than a century of seeing how our government works when it comes to dealing with the disenfranchised segments of our society. They would be able see beyond the veils of deceit and know it is still the rich who are in control, and that corporations have the most power to determine who is elected to serve the people and how they will serve them. Consequently, they would have expected the Republicans to do exactly what they are doing, obstructing Obama at every turn. They would hear beyond the conservative-slanted, often venomous, self-righteous speeches and know it is not really a question of debatable issues about whether Obama's policies are the right or wrong ones. It is the man, himself, whom they feel they must defeat at every turn.

I also suspect that my mother and father would laugh at the notion that we live in a post-racial society. They would recognize that fictional projection as mere propaganda designed to keep the masses content as the one-percent continue to appease their endless greed. After all, we are a capitalistic nation whose forefathers robbed one set of people of their land and made slaves of another race to gain their wealth by any means and call it Manifest Destiny.

Bottom line: When greed rules it is the enemy of inclusion, the abuser of compassion, the jailer of freedom, the dictator of truth and the tyrant of war, and no president, alone, is going to change that or win a second term in office.

When Obama challenged the Congressional Black Caucus at their annual awards dinner, "Take off your bedroom slippers and put on your marching shoes," that's an Obama line I'm sure would have brought a smile to Charlie and Edna's faces the same as it did mine.

Published by Charles Shea LeMone

I am a published author of novels, short stories and poems. For more of my work see: allwordman.com My latest novel, "Corner Pride" is available at Multicultural Educational Publishing Company and has been...  View profile

13 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Gail4/13/2012

    Charles, I would love to have met your parents, they sound like solid, outstanding people. I'm caucasian and I can tell you from my vantage point, the dividedness in this country is pervasive. What's disturbing is that much of the HATE, LIES, and FEAR mongering expected from far right conservative America has permeated more moderate conservatives. I can only speculate, but, I strongly feel this merely a super sensitivity of having a black President.

  • Charles Shea LeMone3/21/2012

    It is ironic that in this so-called post racial society, there are more and more hate groups that are growing in numbers at an alarming rate since 2008. Another sign that ignorance, lies and propaganda are still barriers to true unification, came a few weeks ago when a poll showed that the majority of people in Mississippi and Albama believe Obama is a Muslim.

  • Scott3/20/2012

    I agree that some things never change. The top 1% still use divisive issues such as race to divide and conquer as they grab all the pie from the bottom 99%. How many soldiers died in the Civil war defending or fighting against slavery when most of the financial gains of that system had gone to the top 1% of that day? I would like to see us get to a more Libertarian ideal where we are all valid as individuals and race doesn't matter. Maybe as the country has grown more diverse through immigration and intermarriage things will change over time (racially). But human nature is constant and will always be a challenge, there will always be a 1% looking for an angle to ride on the wagon that the majority are trying to pull. I think we have to be careful though, that in an effort to give Obama a benefit of the doubt we overlook things like his willingness to continue and even expand on some of the more obnoxious things that the neocons did. Compare his policy on say the war on drugs, or Gitmo to that of Bush, not a lot of difference. I get frustrated when I see someone like Ron Paul dismissed as a racist, for things that are no more condemning than Jeramiah Wright, when his policy proposals would actually push us in the direction of a post racial society and pull us out of the foriegn wars (and war on drugs/civil liberties) that disproportionally affect poor and minority people. I just pray for the best and that God can bring us together as a nation in these challenging times. Peace. Scott (from Jim's discussion on March 20)

  • Charles Shea LeMone12/4/2011

    Captain Sterno,

    I agree with everything you wrote here, and I thank you for taking the time to leave a comment. Yes, times have certainly changed for the better. Back when my parents were still alive, just 20 years ago, they would've been amazed if any black man came anywhere near winning a presidential election. And speaking of being amazed, I was surprised that Cain received as much support as he did.

  • Captain Sterno12/4/2011

    Well having just channel surfed the sunday morning talking heads puzzling out the Herman Cain Mitt Romney Newt Gingrich thing the republicans have to offer I have the very distinct feeling Mr Obama is in for a blistering run for re election and that he will ultimatly prevail because he is actually the smartest guy in the race.

    As for race in the race I think it will always be a factor for some no matter what but as we saw in the last election a lot of people turned out and elected a Black Man!!! Because he was smart not because he was anything other than that.

    To me thats a positive sign of humanity moving forward. But politics is politics, next weeks news could be about some other awful thing that Obama is suddenly responsible for tho he was quietly reading in the Oval Office when whatever it was happened.... another case of PWB...Presiding While Black

  • jim12/3/2011

    Another comment - still can't find our how to vote.....

  • Danielle12/3/2011

    Great article!

  • Charles Shea LeMone12/2/2011

    Chele,

    Thank you for mentioning my latest novel, "Corner Pride." I have been amazed by how this semi-autobiographic novel, about growing up in a gang-infested North Philadelphia neighborhood, has had such wide appeal from such a diverse audience. Most amazing is that a Virginia college professor has made it part his classes' curriculum. That makes one college and one Philadlephia high school using the book. It has also received some very positive reviews and the future for the book looks bright.

  • Chele12/2/2011

    Not until the horrors of Emit Till's murder and the equally shocking death of a young black who was dragged to death behind a car near Peach Tree, Texas for my dad and his family who were raised there to realize that these things did actually happen to human beings because of their color. He was still reluctant to discuss it, but I could tell his heart was changed. But why oh why is it taking sooooo long for this sort of change to permeate some of the corners? I wish my dad had lived long enough to read "Corner Pride."

  • Charles Shea LeMone12/1/2011

    I have to agree with L. D. and Jim that Obama's presidency has disappointed the faithful who put him in office. I believe he made the mistake of thinking that compromising with the Republicans was the best way to build a consensus and get bills passed to even marginally improve the state of our country, having inherited so many problems created by the past administration.

    Also, perhaps the strategy was to demonstrate to the American public that his opposition would stand firmly opposed to any of his policy decisions, merely to see his presidency fail, regardless of how detrimental their obstructionism further damaged the country. More than one right-wing talk show host has declared exactly that.

    Again, I say a president needs the constant support of his constituency to move past partisan opposition. With all that said, I think he has begun to take his case directly to the public--which is a good thing. I'll end this comment by asking one question: Do you think we would have been better off today with McCain and Palin?

Displaying Comments
Next »

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.