COMMENTARY | December 31, 2011, was a day when most Americans were preparing to ring in the New Year. Our President, Barack Obama, was preparing to ring something else - the death toll for the United States Constitution. He did so by signing the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) into law from his vacation rental in Kailua, Hawaii, according to ABC.
The NDAA contains a provision, section 1021, that has drawn fire from civil rights watchdogs. The ACLU calls it "unconstitutional and illegal." It gives the government the power to detain anyone, even American citizens, in military custody forever without trial or recourse of any kind.
The text of section 1021 can be read on page 265 of this PDF at the US GPO web site. It's amazing the public knew anything about it before the vote since it's buried midway in a 565-page bill.
Obama signed the bill into law despite having "serious reservations with certain provisions" in the NDAA, according to CBS. By this he meant section 1021. He followed with this comment:
"I want to clarify that my administration will not authorize the indefinite military detention without trial of American citizens. Indeed, I believe that doing so would break with our most important traditions and values as a nation."
There are two problems with that. First, his statement doesn't bind future administrations in any way - even if he keeps to that promise about his own administration. Second, it doesn't just break "traditions and values." It appears to violate Amendments 5, 6 and 8 of the U.S. Constitution.
This law, which provides the government with a way to circumvent the protections guaranteed every citizen in the Constitution, is an open doorway to tyranny. It's like the terrors of the Nazi Gestapo or the Soviet KGB have come to America, where jack-booted thugs stand ready to drag citizens away to gulags in the dead of night. When the government can declare citizens "terrorists" without evidence or cause, crash down their doors in the dark and take them away, the nation's liberty has been lost.
There's only a short window of opportunity before another administration may come to power - one that has not pledged to steer clear of using this law against American citizens. This law must be overturned immediately or the chance to do so will be lost forever.
Published by Andrew Riggio - Featured Contributor in Technology
Andrew is a freelance writer living in New Hampshire. He is passionate about writing the way Mozart was passionate about music. Andrew writes on subjects from news commentary, politics, technology, video... View profile
- Five Religious History Traditions and Beliefs of the Baha'i FaithThe Baha'i Faith is a very interesting religion and it is actually quite similar to some of the most common religions around the world. Here are five of the most important aspects of the Baha'i Faith.
- Proud of Indian Culture and Values!Every country has its own custom. People of different nations are recognized by their culture. India is a powerhouse catering to almost all the leading global companies of the world.
- Anne Frank and the HolocaustMany years have passed since the end of the Holocaust and today the event is more prominent in public consciousness than it was in 1945.
- Language and Gender: Celebrity Chef Talk!In this paper I examine the relationship between gender and language using celebrity chefs.
- Where Did Our Personal and Great Values Go?Marriages used to last forever now it is sometimes"to hard"to make them last. Most of use are putting family time on the back burner so shut off the tv's and spend time together again. Where does Jesus come in and ar...
- What Race is Barack Obama? Barack Obama Age? Barack Obama Religion?
- The Reasonable Barack Obama
- Family & Medical Leave Act Expanded
- Florida's Civil Commitment Center
- Where Do My Tax Dollars Go?
- Incarceration Vs. Treatment for Drug and Alcohol Related Crimes
- Relating Eating Habits to Lifestyle and Values





3 Comments
Post a CommentSo, Mr Riggio, how would you treat,hold, and or detain persons referenced in this article ? As I read it, the provision is not to be used on American citizens only for those connected to terrorist communities which for all intents and purposes have declared war against the United States.
Should we allow them to post bail and go about their business ? I'm no Obama fan by any means but for you to criticize the actions of Congress and the President with out an alternate plan or process is basically the same as blowing off hot air ( which by the way you seem to do alot of ).
Yes, it had one initiating sponsor from each party.
what scares me the most about this is how it's actually something by both parties. Wasn't John McCain one of the writers of this thing? I seem to recall it being touted as McCain-Levin in certain articles.