It seems that President Obama feels that appeasing China in hopes of acquiring its cooperation in the Iran and North Korea problems is more important than meeting with the Dalai Lama, something that President Clinton and both Presidents Bush did without too much trouble. This seems to be a shift in attitude on the part of President Obama, who, as Senator Obama, urged a boycott of the 2008 Beijing Olympics to protest China's human rights record.
Communist China invaded and conquered Tibet in 1950 and has ruled it ever since as a province. The Dalai Lama, then a young man, was forced to fleet and has lived in exile for nearly sixty years. China regards the Dalai Lama as illegitimate and a "separatist" for campaigning for human rights and independence for Tibet. China has waged a campaign to discourage world leaders from meeting with the Dalai Lama in an attempt to undercut his credibility.
By caving into China's demands, President Obama once again sends a signal of weakness and an almost obsessive desire to please enemies while snubbing friends. This is not just an immoral strategy, but a counterproductive one. If a tyranny such as China gets the idea that an American President will dance to its tune, it will push that advantage to the limit and beyond. Eventually President Obama must tell the Chinese no. It should have been with the Dalai Lama and not, as it will likely be now, something with a high profile and weightier stakes.
President Obama's snubbing of the Dalai Lama is also politically stupid. If there is one thing that the Hollywood Left and conservatives agree upon is that Chinese rule in Tibet is oppressive and evil. Barack Obama may believe that he can annoy Richard Gere, himself a Buddhist who once famously urged the audience at the Academy Awards to send good vibes to facilitate the liberation of Tibet, and he could be right. On the other hand the spectacle of an American President eager to meet with the likes of Hugo Chavez and Ahmadinejad, but who hides from the Dalai :Lama is not very edifying. It suggests a man who does not realize that one is judged by the company one keeps.
Source: Alex Spillius, the Telegraph, October 5th, 2009
Published by Mark Whittington
Mark R. Whittington is a writer residing in Houston, Texas. He is the author of The Last Moonwalker, Children of Apollo, Dark Sanction, and Nocturne. He has written numerous articles, some for the Washington... View profile
- Dear President Obama: Where's the Change? Dear President Obama; I'm writing you this letter with the friendliest of intentions. I, like many of my fellow Americans, understand that not every problem faced by the people of this country is
- President Obama Plans to Continue Rebuilding of New Orleans and Gulf Coast, but wi... Unlike President Bush, President Obama realizes what a necessity a strong New Orleans is to the nation's economy.
- President Obama; Making Changes Quickly A look at some of the changes President Obama has made in the first week in office.
-
The Reasonable Barack Obama
This is an editorial piece about why I think Barack Obama is so popular as a presidential candidate.
-
President Obama Directing Federal Regulators to Tighten Auto Standards
A risky move by President Obama will have him enforcing rules on Automobile Emission and Fuel Efficiency.
- The Many Leaders Supporting the Dalai Lama
- Woodstock Blissed by Dalai Lama
- Twitter the Dalai Lama Today
- Making Human Rights a Global Reality
- A Travel Guide to McLeod Ganj, Dharamsala: The Home of the Dalai Lama
- Five Activists Honored with the United Nations Prize in the Field of Human Rights
- US Refuses to Join UN Human Rights Council Over Lack of Credibility
|
|
- 10 things you need to know today: February 11, 2012 (The Week)
- Grammy Awards preview: Top 5 reasons to watch (The Week)
- No Fun Allowed: L.A. Beaches Ban Footballs, Frisbees, and Sand Digging (ContributorNetwork)
- Good day, bad day: February 10, 2012 (The Week)
- Obama's birth control compromise: 'Still unacceptable'? (The Week)
4 Comments
Post a CommentAs the Russia Today commentator suggests, this seems to be a strong signal that Obama's priorities lie with trade policy rather than human rights.
http://www.mepreport.com/2009/10/obama-snubs-the-lama/
:>)
UGH! What a terrible shame this is!
Pity Obama did this...great article.