The ACLU says, "Though the administration is leaving unsaid which detainees will be moved there and for what purposes, the information it has provided indicates that some detainees might be held for military commission proceedings in Illinois while others might be held at Thomson indefinitely without charge or trial."
If that sounds like what's going on at Gitmo right now, that's because IT IS what's going on at Gitmo right now. It seems that in order to fulfill a campaign promise, the President is merely moving the inhabitants of Gitmo to a new location. The conditions of confinement and plans for the disposition of cases remains unchanged. In fact, President Obama has cited the authority granted to President Bush in the Authorization for the Use of Military Force in 2001 as grounds for continuing Bush's policy, only in a different locale. It's no surprise, then, that Republicans in Congress are labeling the planned site in Illinois as "Gitmo North."
A quote from ACLU Executive Director Anthony Romero included in the press release goes as follows: "The creation of a 'Gitmo North' in Illinois is hardly a meaningful step forward. Shutting down Guantánamo will be nothing more than a symbolic gesture if we continue its lawless policies onshore. Alarmingly, all indications are that the administration plans to continue its predecessor's policy of indefinite detention without charge or trial for some detainees, with only a change of location. Such a policy is completely at odds with our democratic commitment to due process and human rights whether it's occurring in Cuba or in Illinois. In fact, while the Obama administration inherited the Guantánamo debacle, this current move is its own affirmative adoption of those policies. It is unimaginable that the Obama administration is using the same justification as the Bush administration used to undercut centuries of legal jurisprudence and the principle of innocent until proven guilty and the right to confront one's accusers."
Wow. Sounds like a pretty harsh slam to me.
Romero continues: "It is also greatly disturbing that the administration will continue the use of military commissions, which are no more acceptable in Illinois or any other U.S. state than in Guantánamo. Despite some improvements, the commissions still fall far short of the legal standards necessary to comply with constitutional and international standards, allowing, for example, the use of coerced and hearsay evidence that would not be allowed in federal court. The proceedings will achieve neither reliable justice nor a restoration of America's credibility around the world."
And the hits just keep on coming, huh? Like I've said before, it's the difference between running for president and being president. The world looks a whole lot different when you're the guy actually responsible for what happens and no longer the guy just pointing fingers from the outside.
Romero concludes with this: "The Obama administration's announcement today contradicts everything the president has said about the need for America to return to leading with its values. American values do not contemplate disregarding our Constitution and skirting the criminal justice system. After detaining hundreds of individuals without the basic due process rights that define our justice system for almost eight years, it is time to charge suspects where evidence exists and repatriate and transfer the rest to countries where they won't be tortured."
Maybe Mr. Romero should try being the guy responsible. Perhaps then he would see things in a different light. After all, that appears to be what happened to President Obama.
http://www.aclu.org/national-security/creating-gitmo-north-alarming-step-says-aclu
Published by AC Writer
I have very diverse interests and never seem to know what's going to hold my attention at any given time. View profile
- The Constitutional Issue of Habeas Corpus Rights for Guantanamo Bay Detainees The issue of habeas corpus rights for Guantanamo Bay detainees is neither simple nor obvious. It involves a complex analysis of the right itself, the Constitution, and both American and English history.
- Newsweek Under Attack for Shedding Truth About Guantanamo BayThe recent spike of violence in the Muslim world has largely been blamed on Newsweek, which wrote that American interrogators in Guantanamo Bay "flushed a Koran down the toilet" to incite a reaction from the detainees.
- Guantanamo Bay: The Interrogation Practices and Facilities Violate International Lawhow the interrogation facilities and practices at Guantanamo Bay have led to an abuse of human rights and violations of international law
- The Gitmo Detainees and the Supreme Court Decisionspolitical op ed on recent Supreme Court decision regarding the Gitmo detainees
- Should Illinois Be Chosen for a Supermax Facility for Gitmo Detainees?Should the U.S. have terrorists on its soil so they can get a fair shake at the justice system, or could we put an oversight committee at Gitmo for assurance of humane treatment and due process?
- Guantanamo Bay "Detainee Cases" Suspended by Obama Administration
- Prosecuting Guantanamo Bay
- To Close Guantanamo Bay is the American Thing to Do
- The Detention Facilities at Guantanamo Bay Do Conform with International Law
- ACLU Aims to Shut Down Guantanamo Bay with Brightly-Colored Clothing
- The Supreme Court and Guantanamo Bay
- Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Guantanamo Bay Detainees



