A report in the Russian media suggests that President Obama is prepared for one final gambit on the diplomatic front. Obama, according to the report, has proposed that the United States scrap the missile defense system being built in Eastern Europe is exchange for Russia help on stopping Iran from developing a nuclear arsenal. The proposal has the germ of a clever diplomatic move, but also carries great risk.
Everything depends on what Russia has to do in exchange for the end of the missile defense system. If the deal is based on some sort of positive result, i.e. if Iran actually has to officially scrap its nuclear program, with an inspection regime to verify that it has done so, then Obama will have pulled off a coup. But if all Russia has to do is to promise to put pressure on Iran in exchange for no missile defense, then Barack Obama will have made a blunder almost comparable to the one Neville Chamberlain made at Munich in 1938.
Noting the tendency of past Democratic administrations in making bad deals, as well as President Obama's oft stated hostility to the idea of missile defense, one suspects that we may be about to see the latter. No greatest illustration can be made than the decision taken in 1978 by then President Jimmy Carter to suspend development of the so-called "neutron bomb" or as it was more properly called, the enhanced radiation weapon.
The so-called neutron bomb was designed to blunt a Soviet invasion of Europe by irradiating massed armored formations with a minimal of explosive or persistent fall out. The Soviets were against the deployment of the ERW because it would have negated the advantage it enjoyed in conventional armored forces. Opinion in some European countries was hostile because the neutron bomb was perceived as making nuclear war more likely.
President Jimmy Carter suspended the development of the ERW in a unilateral move to try to motivate the Soviets to be more forthcoming in arms control talks. Like much else that Jimmy Carter tried to do, the gambit did not work. One of the first acts that President Reagan undertook was to resume the development of the ERW.
If the Russian report is correct, President Obama may be about to repeat the mistake President Carter made. Suspending development of the missile defense system in Eastern Europe without something concrete in return, such as the complete abandonment of Iran's nuclear program, will be seen for what it is: a sign of weakness and an act of appeasement. An thus history will have repeated itself.
Sources: Clinton says U.S. diplomacy unlikely to end Iran nuclear program, Paul Richter, LA Times, March 3rd, 2009
Obama 'ready to drop shield plans for Russian help on Iran', RIA Novosti, March 3rd, 2009
1978: Carter delays N-bomb production, BBC - On THis Day, 7 April, 1978
Published by Mark Whittington
Mark R. Whittington is a writer residing in Houston, Texas. He is the author of The Last Moonwalker, Children of Apollo, Dark Sanction, and Nocturne. He has written numerous articles, some for the Washington... View profile
- Review of Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid by Jimmy Carter Former President Jimmy Carter's new book has stirred up great controversy, but it actually is an exceptionally perceptive and fair-minded analysis of how to acheive peace in the Middle East.
-
The Reasonable Barack Obama
This is an editorial piece about why I think Barack Obama is so popular as a presidential candidate.
- Barack Obama Addresses Newton, Iowa, Crowd on December 30 Barack Obama (D, IL)spoke to a crowd of would-be caucus-goers in Newton, Iowa at the Newton Senior High School on December 30th, and obliquely rebutted some of the charges being aimed at him by other front-runners in...
-
Barack Obama: Fired Up and Ready to Go
Barack Obama, introduced by former Four Star General "Tony" McPeak, rallies potential Iowa caucus-goers on December 28 in Davenport, Iowa.
- Iran Might Attack Israel, United States with Nuclear Bomb Republican Presidential candidate Sam Brownbeck, a United States Senator from Kansas, said Iran might one day attack America or Israel with a nuclear bomb. He said everything possible should be done to keep Iran from...
- Former President Jimmy Carter Bashes Bush
- Georgia Superdelegate Jimmy Carter to Vote for Barack Obama at Democratic Convention
- Jimmy Carter Plays the Racism Card
- Obama Scraps Missile Defense in Eastern Europe
- Jimmy Carter - the UFO President
- Racism, Jimmy Carter and the Obama Administration
- Is Barack Obama the Return of Jimmy Carter?
|
|
- 10 things you need to know today: February 11, 2012 (The Week)
- Grammy Awards preview: Top 5 reasons to watch (The Week)
- No Fun Allowed: L.A. Beaches Ban Footballs, Frisbees, and Sand Digging (ContributorNetwork)
- Good day, bad day: February 10, 2012 (The Week)
- Obama's birth control compromise: 'Still unacceptable'? (The Week)
4 Comments
Post a CommentA missile defense shield is literally installing a target for a nuclear strike. It doesn't increase security.
Neutron bomb? The communists thought it was the perfect weapon: eliminates people and leaves infrastructure intact.
I don't believe potential terrorists would deliberately route a nuclear weapon through Poland or Chekhia just to prove Bush right.
Stop financing for terrorists and their desire for mischief will dry up.
If the issue is European defense, it would be interesting to hear the consensus of European leaders. With the variety of countries posing potential threats (various Middle Eastern countries, Pakistan, Afghanistan in addition to Russia), it would seem like a decision on a missle defense system should concern not merely capabilities as of today but the potential capabilities and hostilities of tomorrow. It is too easy nowadays for countries to develop nuclear technologies and too common for extremist governments to be established.
Not sure how I feel about this one. Perhaps Obama's approach will produce better results.
I look for Obama to screw this one up big time!