O'Donnell & Garofalo Attack Fox News Channel: Hannity is a Liar, Fox & Friends Hosts Are "douchebags"

Rosie O'Donnell and Janeane Garofalo have attacked the Fox News Channel (for only something like the hundredth time in the last few days) by calling Sean Hannity a liar and branding the Fox & Friends morning show hosts as "douchebags." Appearing on a little-heard show on Sirius XM Radio called "Rosie Radio" (yes, folks, after her "The View" stint, I thought Rosie was no longer employable, but, apparently, someone has unwisely taken a chance on her), Rosie O'Donnell interviewed the extremely unfunny comedian and second-rate "actor" Janeane Garofalo on February 16. However, as with all things where extreme liberals are involved, the so-called "interview" quickly descended into nothing more than a glorified free-for-all to begin character assassinating Fox News Channel and prominent conservatives. Being liberals, O'Donnell and Garofalo clearly thought that name-calling viciousness beat out using actual arguments any day.

Hannity and the Fox and Friends hosts were not the only Americans deemed conservative by O'Donnell and Garofalo who were attacked. The aforementioned, just for good measure, also called out "The View" host Elizabeth Hasselbeck, defaming her as a limited anti-intellectual who's not particularly compassionate, along with having a ridiculous take on religion.

Information about the O'Donnell and Garofalo free-for-all against Fox News and conservatives came to light during a discussion between Sean Hannity and guest Michelle Malkin, with their overriding theme being that liberals these days are getting more vicious because of all the losses they're suffering politically, courtesy of Obama's plunging popularity and the upcoming congressional massacre for the Democrats in November.

Michelle Malkin turned out to be the perfect analyst for this segment as she authored a book called Unhinged: Liberals Gone Wild some five years earlier, detailing already then this exact, same mentality of hatred and personal attacks as an actual strategy in politics among the liberals. In essence, Malkin and Hannity made the point that what sets apart liberals from normal people in their approach to political dialogue (dialogue used very loosely here) is the incomparable hate and viciousness directed at people (read: conservatives) with whom they disagree.

Their discussion quickly turned to getting into the minds and modus operandi, if you will, of the liberal playbook. Their conclusion, which makes all the sense in the world: Liberals are so vicious because they're chronically resentful of the fact that Fox News Channel beats any one of their outlets in terms of analysis, breaking news, and political discussion to the point that it's left them incapable of responding in kind with any equitable platform. Malkin and Hannity also next covered perhaps the most gross aspect of the liberal viciousness: the particular discrimination and precision-targeted hatred of conservative women. The two made a good case that conservative women's values-in general, pro-life socially and pro-capitalism economically, just to name a couple-are viewed by the liberals and their feminist co-conspirators as somehow being the ultimate betrayal. Hence, all the withering assaults against Palin et al.

Religion was another factor agreed upon by Malkin and Hannity as a driving motivating factor for the liberals to launch their hateful attacks. Of course, when we say religion, it's only Christianity that has a liberal open season initiated against it, definitely not Islam (since liberals are probably scared to go after that "Religion of Peace" for a number of reasons). Hypocrisy and double-standards galore are definitely the best way to analyze the liberals' knack to go after Christians with charges of "intolerance" (probably because they're upset that all their ideological causes like gay marriage are opposed by Christians). As in, while the liberals accuse religious conservatives of "intolerance," on the flipside, every time liberals assail conservatives just out of political disagreements, that shows liberals being the epitome of what it means to be intolerant.

On a more personal note, the type of lowlife, gutter-language these liberals like O'Donnell and the unfunny, barely working "comedian" (more like court jester), Janeane Garofalo, employ is so startling that it's actually made me blush. "Douchebags" to describe the Fox & Friends hosts?! Seeing that I'm not in middle- or high-school any longer (and therefore am fond of speaking English properly without the colloquial, slang usage), I actually had to lower myself down into their ghetto and check the much-vaunted Urban Dictionary for a precise definition of just what kind of derogation Garofalo used against said hosts! Apparently, "douchebag" means "someone who has surpassed the levels of jerk and a******, however not yet reached f***** or m***********!" See, that just makes my point: With that kind of mentality where 40-something women think it's cool to use that kind of high-school-type language in seriously describing other Americans, what can you really do to these liberals except to fight back hard and marginalize them?

To send Marc questions, praise or criticism, you can email him at marc_schenker@telus.net

More Reading: Norfolk DA Bill Keating Contradicts Delahunt, Obama Czar John Brennan Says 20% of Terrorists Going Back to Battlefield to kill Americans "isn't that Bad,"Video: Dem Rep. Rush Holt Rips Mic from Hands of Woman Constituent at Town Hall

Sources:

Obama Approval Index History, RasmussenReports

Jeremy Binckes, Low Turnout May Put Democrats At Risk For Midterms, Pollster Says, Huffington Post

Unhinged, Amazon.com

Jeff Poor, MSNBC's Sexist Hypocrisy: Open Season on Conservative Women, CMI

Entry: "douchebag," Urban Dictionary