Oil Leak Didn't Happen Near New York City, so It's Not 'Big News'

Otherwise, the Oil Leak Would Have Interrupted Network Programming

Michael Thompson
A question arises about the level of media coverage of the oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico: The oil leak is the worst environmental disaster in history, certainly a huge story but we have seen no network interruption of regular network programming, not even a la O.J. Simpson on the highway in the white Bronco, not even on Day 86, as news reports indicated that BP finally had found a way to cap the oil leak.

Would this be true if the area at risk of being destroyed were not the Gulf of Mexico shoreline, but the boardwalk along the media capital of the world in the self-proclaimed "Greatest City in the World," New York City?

We thinks this would be a far "bigger" story if the oil leak were occurring along the New York City shores, that at least network programming would be interrupted with urgent news that the oil leak problem was being resolved. For example, if New York City ever experienced anything like Hurricane Katrina, which was more potent than 9/11, mainstream America never would have heard the end of it.

Media decision-makers are based in NYC. They seem to be entirely self-centric. That's why they have not treated the oil leak or Katrina's tragic aftershocks on the level that 9/11 was promoted. Our national news perspective is distorted as a result.

A blogger on the site, dailyskew.com, is a Brooklynite who explores how New York City arrogance afflicts national media coverage, and perhaps explains in the process why the big news regarding the disastrous oil leak did not cause network programming to be interrupted. If it doesn't happen in New York, then apparently it isn't important.

On dailyskew.com, our Booklynite speculates:

... That if pilot Sully Sullenberger had heroically landed U.S. Airways Flight 1549 somewhere way out on, let's say, Lake Ontario, instead of on the Hudson River, "it would have been a blurb, not a national historic moment."

...Amid the aftershock of 9/11, consider how much attention was focused on the Twin Towers, not on the Pentagon: "Quick fact: The Pentagon was also hit."

We might also cite the disproportion of sports coverage given to New York City teams, especially the Yankees, who take the money from being in a larger media market to purchase the best players.

Take note of how when New York City government went broke during the 1970s, and when Wall Street went broke two decades later, New York turned to the "lesser" nation at large for bailouts, as though these were entitlements.

This would all amount to a fun social conversation regarding the alleged New York arrogance, if it did not affect national news coverage.

If the oil leak had occurred outside of New York City's harbors, no doubt there would have been more extensive coverage of the oil leak, and network coverage would have been interrupted for coverage of whether the oil leak was finally capped.

We could order pizza to celebrate the capping of the oil leak, but if it were not a "genuine New York City pizzeria pizza," it would simply not measure up.

SOURCE

http://skew.dailyskew.com/2009/01/is-new-york-city-ov

Published by Michael Thompson

Michael Thompson is a retired newspaper reporter who lives in Saginaw, Michigan. Main topics are political and social justice issues, with occasional escapism into sports and so forth.  View profile

8 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Orchiolum7/24/2010

    Considering the gravity of the current and growing environmental catastrophe, you're right on point Michael...scant coverage. Also sobering that so few are clamoring for information about an environmental disaster, right here on their own shore, which may linger for decades. Eventually, addicts cannot see the damage done to anything and anyone around them, and we are heavily addicted to oil. Perhaps most don't want to know the true cost of greedily consuming objects and all things celebrity. A touch of decadence may be healthy, but history shows the effect of decadence overdose to be fatal and far reaching.

  • Cycy Larson7/20/2010

    I agree that there is definitely some truth to this view.

  • Jesse Schmitt7/19/2010

    Sorry Mike. Gotta disagree. The oil leak is EVERYWHERE on the news networks, local news, etc. AND, the oil leak is still unresolved as to the finality of things. So until there is a real solution, the story continues.

  • Gwen Navarrete7/19/2010

    As a native of New York, I have to admit you bring up some excellent points, Mike. After all, we heard about the major power outage and the bombing attempt in Time Square on a regular basis. I guess I'm just used to hearing about "back home" all the time, so it never occurred to me that coverage might be skewed. Great article, Mike!

  • Dave Simmons7/19/2010

    If you think this is poor coverage, imagine if it were a non-domestic problem, and the oil was lapping against the shores or, say, Switzerland. Unless it made oil prices go up at all, you'd probably STILL not have heard about it.

    (Yes, I know Switzerland is landlocked ;P)

  • Saul Relative7/19/2010

    Sung to "New York, New York" tune: "If it's not news there, it's not news anywhere; It's got to be... New York, New York!!!" Because the Who Dat Nation only mattered when they were in the Super Bowl... But who dat gonna talk about that oil spill?

  • David A. Reinstein, LCSW7/19/2010

    Sad commentary... "If it ain't me... It just don't be."

  • Lyn Lomasi7/19/2010

    I never thought about it that way. Excellent writeup!

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.