One Parent's Opinion: Spanking

Is it Necessary? Needless? Or Child Abuse?

M.S. Beltran
If you find joy in causing controversy, all you need to do is to go to any parenting message forum or chat room, and simply type, "spanking- yea or nay?" Then sit back and watch the sparks- not to mention accusations, links and statistics- fly.

Spanking advocates argue that spanking is a tried and true, tested form of discipline. They claim that allowing a child to get off too easy when he misbehaves will only encourage more bad behavior. Physical punishment administered in a controlled manner for more serious offenses will prompt the child to make better choices and heed warnings in order to avert the punishment. Many of them were spanked and it did not harm them- in fact, they are grateful that their parents set strict boundaries and followed through with spankings to teach them lessons. They look around today and marvel at how many badly behaved children there are, and directly equate it to the non-spanking movement.

Those who have pitched tents in the anti-spanking camp argue that spanking is merely a last resort for failed parenting skills. Some even would go so far as to call mild swats on a clothed behind abusive behavior. The feel that spanking a child only teaches the child aggressive behavior, and that a person in a power position is justified in physically assaulting a person in a weaker position when they don't like what they're doing. Many of them were spanked when they were younger and feel their parents were being rash and impatient- rather than behaving out of respect, they behaved out of fear. They look around today and marvel at how many badly behaved children there are, and directly equate it aggressiveness and lack of respect for authority arising from being spanked too often.

I personally believe that comparing any kind of spanking to abuse is going overboard. Certainly there are parents who stretch their definition of spanking too far, but I do not believe that the majority of parents who will swat their children are causing serious harm or lasting scars. I believe parents who spank can still be loving, caring, good parents with the best intentions. I don't believe that a parent should land in jail for a simple spanking, or that their child who loved them would be better off in the foster care system away from her family. I do believe children can be brought up in a home that uses spanking as a method of discipline and turn out to be well-adjusted, happy adults- adults who can grow up to love their parents and have a good relationship with them.

Likewise, parents who do not spank do not necessarily fail in disciplining their children. Non-spanking parents can make good use of positive reinforcement (complimenting children for good behavior) and negative reinforcement (reminding children of limits and rules), and, when necessary, can punish a child effectively without spanking them. Time outs, loss of privileges, and assignment of unpleasant tasks (such as writing lines, or doing extra chores) have proven to be just as effective a deterrent to bad behavior as spanking can be.

The key is really not in the method of punishment one chooses, but in the consistency with which it is measured out. Any method of punishment- spanking or non-spanking- can fail if it is not consistent.

For instance, if a parent only spanks or takes away privileges sometimes when a child acts out, and sometimes just complains and makes threats without following through, and sometimes just ignores or forgives the behavior, the boundaries become unclear to the child. Their developing brains urge them to test those boundaries, which will increase, rather than decrease, the undesired behavior.

When it comes down to it, a parent needs to worry more about deterring bad behavior, and being consistent with dealing bad behavior- not in the method of punishment they choose to remedy bad behavior. That said, I believe it makes spanking completely unnecessary. To me, it is pointless to spank a child if you are not disciplining consistently and effectively in other ways, because harsh erratic punishments will teach a child aggressive behavior. And if you are disciplining consistently and effective in other ways, why go to the extreme of spanking when there are many other methods of punishment to employ? It's akin to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut- sure, it might work, but a simple nut cracker would have been the easiest and most reasonable approach.

However, I will applaud any parent that uses spankings as part of an overall approach to effective discipline, because in the long run it is far better than inconsistent discipline- or no discipline at all.

Published by M.S. Beltran

I'm a NYC native residing on the sun coast of FL with my husband and 3 homeschooled children. Official occupation: Freelance Jack-of-All-Trades. Duties include: freelance writing, decorating, teaching, t...  View profile

  • Spankings are not generally detrimental to a child's growth and development
  • Spanking is not synonymous with discipline-- discipline can take many forms
  • When it comes to discipline, consistency is key, not the method with which you employ it

5 Comments

Post a Comment
  • PD Everitt8/30/2010

    People used to think it was necessary to "spank" adult members of the community, military trainees, and prisoners. In some countries they still do. In our country, it is considered sexual battery if a person over the age of 18 is "spanked", but only if over the age of 18.

    For one thing, because the buttocks are so close to the sex organs, anal region, and so multiply linked to sexual nerve centers, striking them can trigger powerful and involuntary sexual stimulus in some people. There are numerous physiological ways in which it can be intentionally or unintentionally sexually abusive, but I won't list them all here. One can read the testimony, documentation, and educational resources available from the website of Parents and Teachers Against Violence In Education at www.nospank.net.

  • PD Everitt8/30/2010

    Child bottom-slapping/battering vs. DISCIPLINE:

    Child bottom-slapping/battering (euphemistically labeled "spanking","swatting","switching","smacking", "paddling",or other cute-sounding names) for the purpose of gaining compliance is nothing more than an inherited bad habit.

    Its a good idea for people to take a look at what they are doing, and learn how to DISCIPLINE instead of hit.

  • PD Everitt8/30/2010

    There are several reasons why child bottom-slapping/battering isn't a good idea. Here are some good, quick reads recommended by professionals:

    Plain Talk About Spanking
    by Jordan Riak
    http://www.nospank.net/pt2010.pdf

    The Sexual Dangers of Spanking Children
    by Tom Johnson
    http://nospank.net/sdsc2.pdf

    NO VITAL ORGANS THERE, So They Say
    by Lesli Taylor MD and Adah Maurer PhD
    http://nospank.net/taylor.htm

  • PD Everitt8/30/2010

    Just a handful of those helping to raise awareness of why child bottom-slapping/battering isn't a good idea:

    American Academy of Pediatrics,
    American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry,
    American Psychological Association,
    Center For Effective Discipline,
    Churches' Network For Non-Violence,
    Nobel Peace Prize recipient Archbishop Desmond Tutu,
    Parenting In Jesus' Footsteps,
    Global Initiative To End All Corporal Punishment of Children,
    United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child.

  • PD Everitt8/30/2010

    In 26 countries, child corporal punishment is prohibited by law (with more in process). In fact, the US was the only UN member that did not ratify the Convention on the Rights of the Child.

    The US states with the highest crime rates and the poorest academic performance are also the ones with the highest rates of child corporal punishment.

    There is simply no evidence to suggest that child bottom-slapping/battering instills virtue.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.