Our Fundamental Future of Eliminating Compulsory Education

The Economic Balance Beam

TAW
The Elimination of compulsory education could result in an economic slump. However, it has the opportunity to eventually level itself out. From the point of education being expunged, fewer children would attend school, more teachers would be laid off, and there will be an increase on unemployment dependency. A loss of school funds would occur, which might provide the vital balance in the general economy.

If given the legal right, there would be many parents who choose to allow their children not to attend school and work instead. Sometimes it benefits low income families to have their children labor near or outside the household to make ends meet. Additionally, teenagers under 16 would have the option to drop out if they felt education wasn't an important part of their life.

With fewer children attending school, there would be a less dependency on teachers, lunchroom workers, janitors, and other workers that help the upkeep of a typical American school. Many face the chance of being laid off. With no other choice, these unemployed workers would have to try to find another source of income while endlessly waiting for another job opening.

According to the US Department of Labor (www.bls.gov ), the United States has an estimated national debt of $1.59 million per day and around currently 6.1% of the country receiving unemployment benefits. This country simply cannot afford to lay off school workers. You can expect these numbers to rise. There aren't many choices for laid off employees. Applying for government help, waiting for another job opening, or depending on another family member's income are the only options one may have.

Funding for school covers lunch services, teacher benefits, fundraisers and more. With the inadequate effects of slicing away compulsory education, fewer funding for schools might actually benefit the economy. According to the US Department of Education (www.ed.gov) the government spends $36 billion a year towards the needs of elementary and high schools. Imagine a balance beam. The left side is government funding for education and the right side is the national debt. If less money is going towards schools, this will help balance the national debt. However, with more teachers on unemployment dependency could make this debt rise, but options are available for those teachers such as; college employment, depending on another family member until a job opens, or choosing another career.


Many services and jobs depend on compulsory education. We will have to thoroughly investigate and decide which side of the balance beam will benefit not only teachers and the economy, but our children as well.

Published by TAW

WriterLogic.com has been launched! Come join the freelance writers group.  View profile

  • Funding for school covers lunch services, teacher benefits, fundraisers and more.
  • Many services and jobs depend on compulsory education.
  • If given the legal right, many parents would allow their children not to be school, but work instead
According to the US Department of Labor (www.bls.gov), the United States has an estimated national debt of $1.59 million per day and around currently 6.1% of the country receiving unemployment benefits.

6 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Mari6/2/2009

    Complete and utter bull sh--.
    I mean, I know that there are a small handful of people in the world that don't care for or don't need an education, but what about all of those who have depth, intellect, and the passion for learning but were born into the lower classes? They would do a lot better than a couple of lazy rich kids who don't have the brains for anything. Sadly, what determines whether a kid would choose school or work is not how much they can learn/want to learn, it is how much suffering they see around them. This country would be losing a lot of talent and will eventually have a large number of incompetent and lazy people in the workforce.

  • Ragnor Ladvak III9/24/2005

    I'd like to know how there could be three people out there who actually agree with this load of crap. It must be the author clicking all of the thumbs-down.

  • Lodvok8/28/2005

    Your "idea" would result in nothing but allowing the rich to get even richer and the poor to get even poorer. It's already happening now because the poor can't afford health insurance and college tuition, but your idea would encourage them to drop out of high-school too, thus ensuring that they can't even get the low-paying jobs they get now. I agree with Davido - This is the dumbest thing I've ever heard.

  • Tia Scott8/23/2005

    To clarify this opinion piece about children working, I am all for this countries child labor laws. I wasn't saying you should send your 5 year old to work at Mc Donalds. However, I was merely stating that for instance, a 14 year old could work part time to help his/her low income family while either being home educated or schooled on weekends.

    This is just an opinion piece, a 'what if' scenario. I'm glad we have compulsory education. I'm definitely glad education is supported by our government.

  • Missy8/23/2005

    Interesting opinion piece. Gives a lot to think about if compulsory education ever was eliminated.

  • Davido8/22/2005

    This is the dumbest thing I've ever heard. You can't be serious?

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.