Paid in Full: Materialistic Items or Simplicity?

Firefly
Consider the world we live in. Are we still the same people we were generations ago? Or have we turned from a simplier life for a wasteful, materialistic one? Times are changing and some have refused to change with it.

Are you willing to keep up with the Jones' to buy more expensive items? Take for instance a Rolex vs. a Timex. Both are watche. Both tell time, but one comes with a hefty price tag. You can purchase a Rolex anywhere from $2,000.00 and up or you can save and buy a Timex for $30.00 and up. The purpose of a watch is to tell time, not to impress friends, family or co-workers. Why would a middle class citizen be willing to go into debt for a materialistic item?

We forget that each item has a purpose. Are you buying it for a materialistic value or for a useful purpose? Does a name make a difference?

We have become a wasteful, materialistic nation. We are spending more than we make. For what? For useless name-brand items that sit in our closets, in our garages, in our offices, and all through-out the home. What if you took that money and put it into a high interest savings account? Could you retire early? Of course you could.

Is it a neccessity? I believe this is a decision that each individual will have to make. I am choosing the savings account and early retirement over the high price of a materialistic, named-brand item. I prefer to live the simple life and enjoy what I have.

Published by Firefly

I am a mother of 3 boys and the wife of a wonderful man for the last 18 years. I work outside the home full-time as a paraprofessional. In my profession, I work with special education students.  View profile

  • Simplicity or Materialistic? You choose.
  • We have become a wasteful, materialistic nation.
  • Rolex and Timex both offer watches.
We have become a wasteful, materialistic nation. We are spending more than we make.

1 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Shannon Christman3/8/2007

    I agree with you that I'd rather save. My sister always argues that the brand name items are better quality, so she's willing to pay more for them. I rarely see much difference in quality between the high-priced items and the low-priced items. In the case of clothes (the spending category where my sister most frequently argues for "quality"), the high-priced items go out of style before they wear out, anyway, so why not buy something for less that lasts just as long?

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.