President Musharraf has been increasingly criticized for dictatorial measures that threaten democracy in the South Asian nation. If the final votes reveal enough of a majority for the opposition parties, anti-Musharraf elements in the parliament could create an alliance aimed at removing the president from power. Even if Musharraf is able to hold on to power, his ability to control events within Pakistan will be severely limited by the parliament.
Whether or not Pakistan's opposition parties will form an alliance to counter Musharraf is somewhat in doubt. The two parties have found themselves at odds in the past, and either may elect to work with other groups within the parliament instead. Lisa Curtis, Senior Research Fellow in the Asian Studies Center at The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, writes in a Heritage web memo that the election will help steer Pakistan toward civilian rule and that the United States should recognize Musharraf's diminished capacity and take steps to work with the new Pakistani government.
While many observers internal and external to Pakistan feared that Musharraf would rig the elections, the polling appeared to be free and fair.
President Musharraf is now essentially a lame duck president, and the future of Pakistan's alliance with the United States in the global war on terrorism is very much uncertain. Jayshree Bajoria, writing in an analysis for the Council on Foreign Relations, an independent Washington think tank, says polling data reveals that less than 10 percent of Pakistanis agree with cooperating with the United States in the war on terror. Part of the problem, many believe, is that the United States has aligned itself too much with Musharraf and has not concentrated enough on focusing efforts on the whole of the Pakistani government.
President Musharraf is not the only loser in Monday's parliamentary elections. Radical Islamic parties did not fare well either and religious fundamentalists who won surprising parliamentary victories in 2002 saw those gains erased in the wake of the rise of Pakistan's two primary opposition parties.
Published by AC Writer
I have very diverse interests and never seem to know what's going to hold my attention at any given time. View profile
- The War on Terror: A Tragedy of Errors - Why It's Time to Cut Our Losses and RunThe so-called "war on terror" cannot be won by sending troops to fight in Iraq. The best way to achieve homeland security is to bring the troops home and begin using our human and financial resources to protect our na...
Why the "War on Terror" is WrongIntended as a rebuttal to Greg Reesons article, What the Democrats Don't Understand about the War on Terror. I contend that the "war on terror" is wrong. It is wrong because the...- Rudy Giuliani Riding the War on TerrorRudy Giuliani has found his defining issue in the War on Terror. While this issue is currently a good one for Candidate Giuliani, the question is how far can attachment to this single issue really take him in his run...
- War on Terror Vs. War in IraqAt one time, we were told the war in Iraq was part of the war on terror. Now there supposed to be separate?
- Fighting the War on TerrorThe creation of a new combatant command for Africa is a recognition that the war on terror extends beyond Iraq and Afghanistan.
- Bush vs. Iraq: How the war on terror became a war on Iraqi human rights
- War on Terror
- President Bush and "The War on Terror"
- The War on Terror: Protesting the Liberation of Iraq
- What the Democrats Don't Understand About the War on Terror
- 24, Fiction and the War On Terror
- Is the War on Terror Winnable?



