Palin Unqualified or Victim of Sexist Attacks?

Louisa Burgess
I'm not going to pussyfoot around...my opinion right upfront is that she is unqualified, period. However, there are those that fret that Sarah Barracuda is simply the victim of sexism. Sexism from the Democrats, from the liberal media, anti-gun people, and just about anyone else you can think of. I've even seen comments that have the audacity to imply that this is much the same as what happened to Hillary Clinton. Please, I have met Senator Clinton and Governor Palin is no Senator Clinton. Nope, it certainly isn't the same "sexism" and here's why.

Facts are facts. Very few people said that Hillary Clinton was unqualified to be President or Vice President. The attacks on her during the primary were and remain similar to the attacks she has endured for many years. They are hate attacks. Attacks that are based on deep seated sexism, added to the attacks that are based on the hatred of anything Clinton people. The attacks on Palin are mostly partisan attacks against a female politician that appears to be simply put, in over her head.

Check out her interview with CBS's Katie Couric if you don't believe me. It's all over the internet and print media. If nothing else, the fact that more than once Governor Palin in response to questions her staff and McCain's campaign staff surely knew she would be asked, answered that she would "get back" to Couric with the answer. There were questions about he "bailout", foreign policy, her specific experience, John McCain's policy. There were no go for the jugular surprise questions. Here is an example of the foreign policy question quoted from an article in the Washington Post today, written by Fareed Zakaria:

" When asked (by Couric) how living in the state closest to Russia gave her foreign-policy experience, Palin responded thus:"

"It's very important when you consider even national-security issues with Russia as Putin rears his head and comes into the airspace of the United States of America. Where--where do they go? It's Alaska. It's just right over the border. It is from Alaska that we send those out to make sure that an eye is being kept on this very powerful nation, Russia, because they are right there. They are right next to--to our state."She also stumbled and mumbled and spoke in fractured sentences appearing as uneasy as a person could possibly be in front of a camera. The sharp tongued, smart sounding Governor from Alaska that ignited the spark at he Republican Convention was absent. It was almost painful to watch.

Why is this important and why does it show how meager her qualifications are? For one, any politician who has risen to the level of Governor of their state should be able to face a camera and answer some expected questions without falling apart. Second, it points to the inadequacy of her experience. To simply say that the state you live in and govern is "next door" to Russia, does not give you the right to say you have foreign policy experience. The Governor of Alaska has never had the need to deal with high level foreign policy.

Critics of Sarah Palin are not saying this person isn't qualified because she is a woman. They are not giving her a difficult time because they hate her husband. Far as I can see, the closest the sexism has come are the few who have said she should stay home with her children, and that is just ignorant. Critics of Sarah Palin are criticizing her because the Vice Presidency is as the saying goes, a heart beat away from the Presidency, and the idea that McCain would choose someone so ill-prepared for the job is mind boggling.

I'm not one of those Democrats that thinks Barack Obama can walk on water. I am a Clinton Democrat, I admit. I also admit that I was hoping Obama would have at least had the common sense, 18 million votes worth, to have picked Clinton for his VP choice. This life long Democrat toyed with the idea of breaking ranks and voting for a Republican for the first time in her life because I truly feel that the DNC treated Hillary Clinton unfairly and with bias. I can spot sexism a mile away and Palin is not a victim of it. If anything she was given a huge pass because she is a woman. McCain's choice of VP candidate leaves me no choice but to assume that his judgment is very lacking in an important area - the decision to place an obviously unqualified person in the position to possibly take over his reigns should he be elected and if anything, god forbid, happen to him that renders him incapable. McCain has unwittingly galvanized and energized a segment of the voting public that can make a difference - white, middle-class voters with common sense, now for Obama.

Published by Louisa Burgess

Life long NYer. Expressing myself through the written word has been my lifelong hobby and vocation. Somehow I managed to raise two sons and actually worked for a living! Recently moved to Texas!Louisa Burges...  View profile

21 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Morton Templeton11/13/2008

    great piece and nicely done

  • Will10/24/2008

    While I do agree with your analysis of Clinton's victimization due to sexism, I must disagree with your statement that Palin is not equally victimized. The sexism experienced by each woman stem from opposite attributes yet are equally as damaging. Clinton was commanding and intelligent. There are those who view these qualities as threatening when possessed by a woman and were thus interpreted as conniving and manipulative (an unshakable image for her, especially as questions regarding the source of campaign funding surfaced). Conversely Palin, a fairly inexperienced politician, would most likely be afforded some leniency in her botched interviews if she were a young male VP candidate. Her attractiveness immediately reduces her credibility. Being a 20 year old male from in an ivy league university (where you would expect opinions dictated by informed careful decisions and free of sexual biases), the major complaints I hear about Palin are: "you can just tell that she is unintell

  • ILAKKUVANAR MARAIMALAI10/16/2008

    A good analysis.

  • Sheri Fresonke Harper10/13/2008

    Good question and discussion :) Sheri

  • Secretsides10/6/2008

    Very well said. I am not a clinton fan, but I am definitely not for Palin. I believe she very horribly unqualified as VP letting alone President. I will vote for Obama even though he is not perfect he sure beats the alternative. I am dumbfounded that McCain chose Palin as his running mate.

  • Sofya Blinder10/2/2008

    Wonderful article :)

  • Bobbi Leder10/1/2008

    This is exactly why Obama should have waited until 2012 to run and let Hillary have her four years in the sun. It's so unfair; none of the candidates are floating my boat.

  • mimpi10/1/2008

    you go girl....

  • Tony Vega9/30/2008

    The sexist attitude doesn't stem from the claim that she is inexperienced or not qualified. The sexist commentary stems from the attitude that she "can't do it because she has children and she has a child with special needs" An attitude that isn't shared when speaking about the male counterparts. And I agree she does lack experience. But the experience she does have including her record of accomplishments puts Obama's qualifications to shame. Obama has a trail of failed policies. Biden a man with more experience than anyone running has horrible interviews also did you catch his pathetic interview with Couric? If not I'll send it to ya.

  • kelly m.9/30/2008

    Palin governs a state that never has to balance a budget (it always has a surplus thanks to oil dollars) and that manages unemployment with individual payments to citizens from that surplus. That doesn't mean she isn't qualified to handle those things, just that she's never had to - so we assess her based on how well informed and tactical she is. She has repeatedly shown that she hasn't exactly been hitting the books or staying current on national let alone foreign policy issues. That is simply not acceptable in a vice presidential candidate. Her unreadiness is less about a lacking in the depth of her experience as it is a lacking in her overall education, exposure and immersion into critical issues.

Displaying Comments
Next »

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.