According to The Center for Public Integrity, the Bush Administration has made "at least 935 false statements...about the national security threat posed by Saddam Hussein's Iraq" (Lewis and Smith). After extensive investigations, The Center for Public Integrity claims that these false statements were fabricated with the intent of misleading the United States. The Center has compiled a searchable list of statements from the Administration and I have chosen some key recurrent themes from this database.
Iraq as a Danger to the US
There's one key question we Americans should be asking ourselves: where is the proof? So far, we've seen the Administration use weapons of mass destruction as a vague threat meant to rally the people toward Bush's wishes. Bush's statements read like bitter school-aged slumber party fodder: "There's no question that the leader of Iraq is an evil man. After all, he gassed his own people. We know he's been developing weapons of mass destruction."
For me, this statement is just wrong. Firstly, what are the connections among the statements? How does a subjective statement about one's evilness and gassing equate to weapons of mass destruction? These statements tell us virtually nothing, so why does one accept such presidential statements as a war validation? Plus, judging by the apparent lack of weapons of mass destruction, even after five years in Iraq, I highly doubt the existence of the weapons.
Terrorism
Bush is quoted as saying, "Well, my message is, is that if you harbor a terrorist, you're a terrorist. If you feed a terrorist, you're a terrorist. If you develop weapons of mass destruction that you want to terrorize the world, you'll be held accountable." Apparently, this terrorism policy only holds for certain, select countries. The US is knowingly housing a terrorist, but we're not terrorists? I guess Bush's brand of terrorism only includes ramming planes into the sides of buildings. I would also include bits about murdering innocent people, but it seems as though the US can do that as well. Some may call this nit-picking, but I believe that this statement falls under the heading of "deliberate misleading".
Refusing to be Invaded Makes One Guilty
Vice President Dick Cheney tops the cake with one of his statements: "There's every reason to believe, since he kicked out inspectors, that he did that specifically because he wanted to develop further his [Hussein's] capabilities in this area, so-called biological, chemical agents and nuclear weapons..." Basically, Cheney's proof for weapons of mass destruction is that Hussein booted inspectors out of his country. It seems as though Hussein's hesitation had nothing to do with the fact that Hussein probably didn't want Americans tromping all over his country. Kicking out inspectors is not proof - it's an assumption, at best. Cheney's statement reeks of questionable practices.
Powell's Sources
The best example of this crooked administration lies in a couple of quotes that I believe speak for themselves. Colin Powell is quoted on The Center for Public Integrity's site as saying, "My colleagues, every statement I make today is backed by sources..." Unfortunately, Powell was shot down in a report by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence: "Much of the information provided or cleared by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) for inclusion in Secretary Powell's speech was overstated, misleading or incorrect." This incident leads one to wonder: What else have they lied about?
Sources:
Charles Lewis and Mark Reading-Smith, "False Pretenses". The Center for Public Integrity.
"False Statements Database". The Center for Public Integrity.
Published by SH
- Feeling like a Terrorist: A First Person Account of Extended Security and How to A...Feeling like a terrorist is a first person account of extended security in San Francisco International Airport and concludes with some tips for avoiding this long process.
- Second Amendment's Right to Bear Arms Requires Re-examinationThe concept of gun control is in need of re-examination and re-interpretation; the needs and demands of the eighteenth century, when the Second Amendment to the Constitution was drafted, are not applicable to current...
- How Kerry Supporters Can Take Comfort in Bush's Re-ElectionThose still outraged over the outcome of the 2004 Presidential election can find some comfort if they would only study history, which tells us over and over again that things have a way of eventually working out for t...
- Why Not Re-open the 911 Investigations?Ok, I think it's safe to say that many people, especially those on the Internet, have seen the websites run by people that believe the 911 investigation should be reopened. Well, what is the problem with doing that?
- Terrorist Attacks in Britain: 'Those Who Cure You Will Kill You?'British terrorists are Doctors in the National Health Service.
- Center for Public Integrity: 935 False Statements by the Bush Administration
- President Bush was Right: Weapons of Mass Destruction Found in Iraq
- The Bush Cult and Their Weapons of Mass Destruction
- President Bush's Lies According to the Center for Public Integrity
- Bush Administration Makes 935 False Statement About Iraq, According to the Center...
- How Did the Use of Weapons of Mass Destruction Violate the People of Hiroshima's H...
- Nuclear Weapons May Already Be Obsolete-- New Space Based Weapons of Mass Destruc...
- Bush Administration has fabricated facts
- A discussion on key statements

3 Comments
Post a CommentLove your style and insight.
Interesting perspective :) Sheri
Wow! That's all I can say...