Freshman Tea Party House members, such as Randy Hultgren (R-Ill.), made up eight of the 26 Republicans who voted against the Patriot Act extension. 210 Republicans and 67 Democrats voted in favor of the measures. A majority of Democrats, 122, voted against it.
The failed Patriot Act vote will have no effect on national security if, as it is expected, it is put up for and passes a simple majority vote by the end of the month. The three measures set to expire include the FBI's court-approved roving wiretaps and access to "any tangible thing" pertaining to a terror investigation. These include bank and library records. The third measure permits government surveillance of non-American suspects with no known ties to terrorists.
The argument for the failed Patriot Act measures is that they are vital to the country's national security. Spokeswoman for Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) Erica Elliot commented, "Democrats in Congress voted to deny their own administration's request for key weapons in the war on terror."
The roving wire taps surveillance enable the FBI to listen in on multiple phones of terror suspects. This allows the agency to gather information on potential national security threats, co-conspirators and connections with known terror cells.
The access to tangible records Patriot Act measure allows the government to follow the paper trail of a terror suspect or organization. It can give insight into parts of a terrorist plot and funding sources. This can allow the prevention of threats and lead to the discovery of additional conspirators.
The surveillance of non-U.S. citizen suspects who have no ties to a terror organization allows the government to sniff out "lone wolf" terrorists. These would be terrorists who act on their own motives, with out impetus or support of a terrorist organization. These singular attacks are arguably harder to prevent, because the lack of ties can prevent the FBI from additional intelligence gathering.
Those opposed to the Patriot Act measures, such as Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich (D-Ohio), believe the endangerment of civil liberties outweighs the danger to national security.
Published by Tamara McRill
Tamara McRill is a freelance writer focusing on news, politics, lifestyle and business. Tamara began her career writing for newspapers, including a brief stint as a sports editor, but is now reaching lar... View profile
- The Patriot ActWhat do we think of the Patriot Act and how does it effect us?
- Critically Important Reasons for You to Vote in November 7, 2006 U.S. ElectionTo vote is essential and a constitutional right of all citizens. Important issues like jobs, education, social welfare and scientifically polled issues are to be considered when deciding to vote. Personal interest, cu...
- Why Everyone Should Vote in '08I will be the first to admit that the current election process is convoluted and outdated, but every voice needs to be heard. Left, Right, or Center, if you have an opinion on politics, you should vote and make your v...
- College Playoff System in Front of House of RepresentativesIt's rare that a bill like this makes it so far in the House, and today the next step will be taken that allows the House to talk about possible changes to the college football national championship.
Climate Bill Passes in House of RepresentativesIn a vote that was almost too close to call, the House of Representatives passed 219-212 what is being hailed as a landmark bill, the "Climate Bill," for clean energy on June 26...
- Let the Sun Set on the Patriot Act
- PATRIOT Act: Civil Liberties Vs. National Security
- Section 215 of the Patriot Act Allows the Government to Invade the Privacy of an...
- The US Patriot Act
- The U.S.A. Patriot Act of 2001
- Patriotism and the Patriot Act
- The USA Patriot Act: Taking Away Our Rights and Invading Our Libraries





1 Comments
Post a CommentI don't understand why they wasted time voting it this way when they could do it just the once at the end of month and accomplish what they wanted. Very fine reporting.