PayPerPost Blurs the Line Between Ethical Marketing and Advertising

RT
PayPerPost.com comes under harsh criticism for blurring the lines between personal opinion, public opinion and advertising. With a force of over 15,000 'Posties', as PayPerPost's bloggers are called, PayPerPost can definitely reach a sizeable audience through its various blog networking.

How the system works is this: a blogger is offered monetary compensation for writing a sponsored post in their blog about a product or service, or to create a buzz about an event or whatever else PayPerPost is hired to contract out to the bloggers. The blogger then writes a post that promotes this product, event or service or publishes specific content on their blog from a PayPerPost publisher, and the blogger is paid for creating the post.

When PayPerPost first rolled out its services, there was no mandatory disclosure that required the bloggers to inform readers that the post in the blog was paid for or sponsored. According to the PayPerPost website, in December, all bloggers were required to denote that any PayPerPost blogs posts must be designated as sponsored or paid posts. However, PayPerPost has now, under the criticism of many advertisers and the public, initiated something they call "PayPerPost Disclosure Badges."

These disclosure badges, as indicated by PayPerPost's website, let the reader know the blog post is a sponsored post, while also providing a link to the sponsor as well as other links to information pertaining to the paid blog post itself. (Retrieved from: http://payperpost.com)

This move may well be PayPerPost's response to the recent criticism about PayPerPost in the mainstream news media. This month, the Los Angeles Times, which stated, in part, that PayPerPost and other advertising sites that pay for sponsored blogging, are blurring the lines between advertising and word of mouth outreach.

In a 2006 conference of the Federal Trade Commission, there was talk about mandating disclosure and initiating some regulation on paid to blog activity. (http://www.ftc.gov/)

According to the LA Times article about PayPerPost specifically, the article stated, "...Federal Trade Commission has cautioned that word-of-mouth marketing sponsorships must be clearly disclosed." (Retrieved from: http://www.latimes.com)

TechCrunch.com has some interesting things to say about a not so spectacular launch and strategy used by PayPerPost, so even in the tech world, PayPerPost is being scrutinized as well. (Retrieved from: http://www.techcrunch.com/tag/payperpost)

Again, according to the LA Times articles, Posties, those members who post sponsored and paid blogs for PayPerPost, have boasted earnings of more than $7,000 in less than a year for blog posts. Some have earned considerably more and others considerably less. According to the PayPerPost website, a Postie can post up to three paid or sponsored blog posts per day on one approved blog.

With paid blog posts paying anywhere from a few dollars to around $20 per post, this could be a profitable revenue stream for an active blogger, especially one with more than one blog. Additionally, the PayPerPost Postie community often shares links and promotes each other, providing readers and viewers to the blogs, thus building a readership or following for the bloggers non PayPerPost blog entries.

PayPerPost's website makes clear their terms and conditions for bloggers, including requiring full disclosure of the fact that the Postie may have been paid for some blog posts. The requirement is either on a per post basis or on the main page of the blog site, but it must exist. (Retrieved from: http://payperpost.com/page/terms)

The argument about the ethics of PayPerPost's marketing model will continue, with those receiving money from blogging firmly on the side of PayPerPost and those who believe paid or sponsored blogging pollutes the internet and is deceptive firmly against websites like PayPerPost. A quick search on the internet can provide both sides of the coin so internet users can make up their own minds about the debate.

Sources:

PayPerPost
http://payperpost.com/press/ payperpost_takes_transparency_to_a_new_level
http://payperpost.com/page/terms

Federal Trade Commission
http://www.ftc.gov/

TechCrunch.com
http://www.techcrunch.com/tag/payperpost

Los Angeles Times
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-bloggers9mar09,0,2755971.story?track=ntottext

Published by RT

I'm a teacher and a student, because I learn more from teaching classes than I ever did in school. I like to write, play around with music, and basically have a good time. Hope you enjoy my writing.  View profile

12 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Mommy2Lots8/23/2007

    I use payperpost, but I only choose offers that fit well with what my readers want and I don't cloud my blog with only PPP offers. I think if someone's only blogging PPP offers and doing any and all that pay, no matter the subject, then, yes, there's something wrong with that. But, for those of us who choose to use it by only choosing topics that have something to do with our normal subjects and readership; we shouldn't feel guilty. I certainly don't. Great article. :-)

  • Rhonda J. Rains3/13/2007

    I've never heard of this site. Thanks for info.

  • Siva Kumar Podugupati3/13/2007

    Its take long time to earn. Inspite of earning we can share our views and ideas with others.

  • L. Brown3/13/2007

    There was more to the comment, but apparently I'm too long-winded. :) If I really detest it, I don't have to accept the offer. PayPerPost doesn't care either way. It's no different than a product or website review here in many respects.

    By the way, your articles look top-notch. Most of the blogosphere is not this way, and should not be. It's writing for the masses. It's a different audience. I respect your writing here, but I also happen to disagree with you on this issue.

  • L. Brown3/13/2007

    Timothy, I find it ridiculous to compare paid blogging where all parties know I'm advertising with putting my soul in danger and prostitution. It's an overreaction.

    I see that you are have a clout index of 10. Congratulations! I also notice that your photo is in front of a large number of books. Tell me, have any of these books sent you the check yet? For the advertising, I mean. No? What about any Nike sneakers, Pepsi t-shirt, or Cubs cap that may be in your closet? Don't have any of those? Certainly you own a car, or at least a bike. Have you pried the little tag that tells what type of car and where you purchased it off yet? Surely you live somewhere. Whether it's an apartment or house, somebody is advertising the fact that they convinced you to live there. Americans are all too happy to advertise for companies for free. I'm turning the tables. For more than I get paid for most articles here, I can write 50-100 words that completely disagree with the product listed

  • dreahwrites3/12/2007

    Timothy, I'll have a big mac and some fries please. Me, I'd rather be with my kids.

  • Crystal Sciarini3/12/2007

    Hadn't heard of this site before. Thanks for an informative article.

  • Timothy Sexton3/12/2007

    I truly feel sorry for anyone forced to write under these circumstances. I don't blame them or castigate them for selling their souls; unfortunately, we live in an economic system has systematically devalued the skilled professional and laborer to the point where most cannot live without going into huge credit debt at some point in their lives. Still, I'd rather work at McDonalds than prostitute myself like that.

  • L. Brown3/12/2007

    I agree with VC Dan. I use Payperpost, and when I reach the point where I can make more money off other ads, I will discard them. It is a tool that pays my bills and allows me to spend more time at home with my kids. I believe I am a better blogger because of paid blogging such as this, because it gives me a reason to post when I otherwise might not feel like updating. I think it should be up to each individual blogger whether it is right for their blog or not.

  • The Minus Factor3/12/2007

    I think it is ridiculous for the FCC to get involved in this. No blogger should have to say that their blog was paid. This kind of regulation is a knock on freedom of speech. What's next? The police will crackdown on me if I *talk* about something and am paid for it? I think PayPerPost.com is brilliant. More power to them!

Displaying Comments
Next »

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.