Pelosi Calls on House Reps for State Stimulus but No Bush Tax Cuts Extension

Some Democrats, Geithner Disagree on Renewing Cuts; Financial Expert Not Keen on Their Expiration

Sheryl Young
U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has told members of the House to interrupt their summer break and be back at work on Monday. The purpose is to push through a $26 billion stimulus package for cash-strapped states with crashing economies.

However, currently the buzz is that there are no plans to address the December expiration date of the Bush tax cuts, despite some warnings from Pelosi's own Democratic Party not to let them expire. The "Bush tax cuts" were so named because Congress approved President George W. Bush's tax cut proposals in 2001 and 2003.

Senators Evan Bayh (D - IN), Kent Conrad (D - N.D.) and Ben Nelson (D - Neb) don't favor letting the tax cuts expire. All spoke out within the last couple of weeks stating reasons such as ending the Bush tax cuts in a downturned economy would (a) not increase public confidence and/or (b) not help stave off the federal deficit.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, on the other hand, does not feel that letting the tax cuts expire will further slow the economy, according to White House Correspondent Jake Tapper in his ABC News blog.

CPA warns dismal outlook if Bush tax cuts expire:

William R. Bischoff is a certified public accountant in Colorado Springs for PPC, part of the tax and accounting business at Thomson Reuters. He reported at Reuters that, in his opinion, the Bush tax cuts should be left in place, for reasons such as the following (no direct quotes):

- It's not true that only people in top tax brackets will face higher rates when the tax cuts expire. Congress must take some action on re-defining the percentage tax brackets, or the rates will automatically go up for everyone.

- The marriage penalty (married couples paying more taxes than singles) will automatically increase.

- The Obama administration has promised to increase long-term capital gains tax from 15 percent to 18-20 percent only for marrieds with income of $250,000 or more and singles with income of $200,000 or more. However, Bischoff states again that no action has yet been taken to ensure this increase hits only those people. If not well-defined within the tax code, then every taxpayer will be hiked up to 18-20 percent, with taxes on dividends increasing from 35 percent to over 39 percent.

An analysis of why people at $200,000 or more should not pay higher taxes:

-Many of these people are the "small business owners" the government wants to target. These people own businesses that pay hundreds of citizens' salaries and health benefits. They'll have to lay off more employees or charge the rest of us higher prices for their goods if the government takes more money from them. In the end, we all pay.

-Entrepreneurs making, say, $200,000 to $500,000 probably work harder than the CEO of some Fortune 500 company, who makes $6 million just in bonuses.

-If we punish them with more taxes, we're just inviting a new level of mediocrity because people will never again want to strive for a better life. In the end, we all lose.

Sources:

"It's Official: House Coming Back From Summer Break For State Aid Vote," Matthew Jaffe, ABC News "The Note," 8/4/10.

"Democrats dissent on Bush cuts," Martin Vaughan and John D. McKinnon, Wall Street Journal, 7/22/10.

"What to Expect if Bush Tax Cuts Expire," William R. Bischoff, Reuters, 7/30/10.

"Treasury Secretary Says Letting Bush Tax Cuts for Rich Expire Will Not Slow Economic Growth," White House correspondent Jake Tapper, ABC News Blog, 7/24/2010.

Published by Sheryl Young - Featured Contributor in Politics

Freelance writer since 1997; Featured Political Contributor for Yahoo!; Tampa Tribune Community Columnist/Blogger; Chicken Soup for the Soul; Amy Foundation National Writing Award; happy wife, proud step-mom...  View profile

43 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Teila Tankersley8/21/2010

    politics politics always interesting

  • John Mario8/17/2010

    My major concern about the Bush tax cuts is whether extending the tax cuts would increase jobs or increase the national deficit. Businesses have reported huge profits in the second quarter of this year, but they are not hiring. They are pushing for maximum productivity out of their present employees. And extending tax cuts may not encourage these companies to hire. The reason is that the companies are enjoying their new competitive stand in the world market. This is not likely to change.

  • John Mario8/17/2010

    The Democrats contend that the tax cuts in the Stimulus package will offset the Bush tax cuts. I'm against taxing those earning over $250,000. We would in effect be punishiing people for having a successful career. If we must shave the tax cuts, the resulting increase in taxes should be shared by everyone.

  • Carrie Matilda8/11/2010

    Talk about a quagmire.

  • Linda Louise Johnson8/10/2010

    Has anybody in the present administration ever held a job? Much less run a business? Don't think the small business owners who will suffer are "fat cat parasites." Parasites are able-bodied people who take money for not working.

  • Elizabeth Valentine8/10/2010

    What a mess!

  • Shirley A. Mandel8/10/2010

    I guess somebody has to pay the Chinese for all that stimulus money!

  • Dan Reveal8/10/2010

    Fantastic as always!!

  • Carmen Magnolia8/10/2010

    PV love

  • Sylvia Cochran8/9/2010

    @John: "I see often firsthand how the people with money use the influence that comes with having money to keep it and keep the status quo." It's called capitalism; it works.

Displaying Comments
Next »

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.