In January, spurred by the support of the Tea Party, Republicans were able to elect Scott Brown to Ted Kennedy's seat in Massachusetts...supposedly to be the 41st vote against Obamacare. However, that would not be enough. In February, Democrats were able to successfully pass their $1.5 trillion health care program through reconciliation, and against the opinion of the majority of Americans.
That was the final catalyst for the Tea Party to truly gain strength and momentum. After almost a year of trying to convince the governing party that their health care policy was too extreme for the bulk of the nation, Democrats simply ignored them, and went against the wishes of a significant majority of the population.
Conventional wisdom from the left at the time was that the Tea Party would fade into oblivion. However, they did not disappear. Far from it. Instead, they refocused their sights to the 2010 elections. If they didn't have the power to reform the entire country in a single move, then they would start with reform of their party. Although not always successful, clearly the results were satisfactory. 2010 gave Republicans their largest gains since 1994, and significantly moved both Houses of Congress to the right.
When picking a person of the year (or in this cases persons of the year) one has to look at their large scale impact on society. Within the United States, no movement or group has had the impact that the Tea Party has had over the past 20 months. One could argue that they have done the impossible...and have successfully moved Barack Obama to the middle (well, maybe not the middle, but let us say, less far left). They have given the Republican party focus that it had completely been lacking since the 2008 elections; some would argue that focus had been missing for much of the past decade.
If the Tea Partiers are able to keep Republican's feet to the fire, and force them to make difficult decisions on spending, the deficit, and maintaining a small but efficient government, their power and influence will be greater than anyone else for the year 2010.
Published by Neoavatara
Grew up in Michigan, went to college at the University of Michigan. After completing medical school and residency, I completed my fellowship at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. I am currently runni... View profile
- Handicapping the Race for Time's 2007 "Person of the Year"Each year, Time Magazine selects its "Person of the Year." While the most recent years have included mostly cop-outs and uninspired selections, this year's selection should be much more provocative.
- Time Magazine's Person of the Year: YOU!!!Congratulations on being chosen as the Person of the Year. You've shared your knowledge and your thoughts with the world.
- 2008 TIME Magazine Person of the Year is Barack ObamaThe latest end of the year honor for Barack Obama, who is ranking number 1 in every other year-end wrap up this month, is his selection as TIME Magazine's person of the year.
Barack Obama is Time Person of the YearPresident Elect Barack Obama has been named Time Person of the Year for 2008, not surprisingly. Considering how Barack Obama has dominated the news this past year, his selection...
Why Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke Won Time Magazine's Person of...Time magazine's Person of the Year 2009 is Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke. Who is this man and why did he win?
- Time Magazine "Person of the Year" is Not an Honor for Barack Obama
- Time Magazine 2009 Person of the Year is Ben Bernanke
- Mark Zuckerberg: Time Person of the Year 2010
- Who or What Will Win Time's Person of the Year 2007?
- Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg Named Person of the Year
- Will Benazir Bhutto's Assassination Cause Time to Wait to Pick the Person of the Y...
- Who Will Be Time's Person of the Year?




2 Comments
Post a CommentThe Tea Party faces some serious hurdles in 2012. Unlike in 2010, the Tea Party has to defend it's record in Congress. The Tea Party will be attacked by moderate Republicans, Democrats and Obama for their 'my way or the highway' stand and their willingness to allow a national debt default which would have a devastating effect on our economy.
What I think is interesting is that the incredibly stupid rhetoric of the Democrats only served to polarize the Tea Party people even more and went a long way to insure a Republican victory in the last election. Democrats should study the Dodo bird, its stupidity was a major factor in its extinction.