Produced and co-written for the screen by Andrew Lloyd Webber, the movie has great potential. Webber has phenomenal skills as a composer and is a master of musical moods, so it's not surprising that the movie excels musically. Webber's signature melodies are striking in their simplicity, yet they are so beautifully singable that it's almost guaranteed you'll leave the theater at least humming a tune. The orchestral track is steller, Emma Rossum sings beautifully as Christine, and while Gerard Butler's voice is obviously less than perfect, I think he's wonderfully musical. What imperfections are present in his performance as the Phantom end up only adding depth to his character.
It was the coupling of Webber's music and director Joel Schumancher's (Batman Forever) over the top visual style that made me nervous prior to viewing the movie. My reservations were put to rest, however, about three minutes into the film, as the thunderous organ of the Phantom's theme accompanied a magnificently lavish and Gothic opening shot that was absolutely breath taking. I was ready for a top-notch film and possibly one of the best screen musicals of all time. Unfortunately, a few absolutely senseless and distracting directorial choices kept the film from being almost flaw-free.
First, the lip syncing, especially toward the end, was just horrendous. There's really no excuse for a big-budget musical to have sounds coming from people who's mouths are closed. It's like watching an old Japanese Godzilla movie, and distracts quite a bit from tremendous art that is present in the associated scenes. Second, the film is framed by scenes from the future at the beginning and the end, so that the story is told in flashback format. This is all good, except that at a few points in the middle of the movie, it flash-forwards back to the future for no discernible reason whatsoever. These awkward and boring clips disrupt the pace and also distract from how the plot is unfolding.
So, while Andrew Lloyd Webber's Phantom looks and sounds great, the two don't quite match up. This, along with some annoying pacing issues, forces me to lower what could have been an A+ film to a still-very-recommended A-.
Published by Nathan R. Hale
Composer, writer, and sci-fi fan Nathan Hale was born in the USA, but spent his childhood abroad in Africa and Europe. He enjoys lending a global perspective to all his creative efforts, including freelance... View profile
- Why Romance is in the Eye of the BeholderRomance comes wrapped in many different packages. Does it matter if they sport ribbons or bows? Or is it the thought that counts the most?
Phantom of the Opera: See This Broadway Production While You CanThis really is a fantastic show. I wouldn't recommend it to little kids, though. GREAT date show!
- The History of Horror: The Cinema, Part IThe four-part series that offers an overview of the history of horror in cinema and the impact societal changes have had on this genre. In this installment, the early cinema and 1930s classic Universal Pictures horror...
The Making of the Jack Pierce TributeIn the 1930s and 1940s, there was no greater a makeup artist in movies than Jack Pierce; in June of 2000, several dozen craftspeople from Hollywood gathered to pay tribute to th...- Return to the Days of No TalkiesFeel like a moviegoer in the 1920s at the Silent Film Concert Series at the McKinney Performing Arts Center.
- Why Didn't Moviegoers Surrender to Phantom of the Opera?
- "Phantom of the Opera" is a Show Worth Seeing
- More Thoughts on the Film Phantom of the Opera
- Phantom of the Paradise: A GLAM Opera!
- Top Gifts Under $30 for the Musical Theatre Fan
- Classic Must-See Movies: Horror 1920-1960: Dracula, King Kong, Psycho, Phantom of...
- Gifts for Phantom of the Opera Fans



