Photographer Nan Goldin's Work: Art or Porn?

Robert Sunset
History

Nan Goldin was born in 1953 in Washington D.C. After moving to Boston, in 1965 her sister Barbara committed suicide. This led to her moving to Lincoln, Massachusetts and taking up photography as a means to preserve every moment she could. No doubt the trauma of losing a sister helped with this decision. Nan enrolled in the Satya community school in Lincoln which was an alternative education center.

Nan Goldin and her two closest friends, David Armstrong and Suzanne Fletcher did a lot of experimentation with cross dressing and were very engaged in the drag queen scene of the 1970's. Nan Goldin often photographed drag queen beauty contests. This led to a great interest and lifelong devotion to exploring gender, sexuality, and counter-culture movements.

Nan Goldin then moved on to study at the Boston School of Fine Arts. This helped refine her photography style and gave her all the knowledge she would need to begin creating some of her most controversial works. In 1978, Nan Golding moved to New York and got heavily involved in alcohol, drugs, and relationships that were very abusive. She photographed a lot of this. Nan Goldin has many pictures of beaten and battered men and women which were part of her slide shows.

Much of Nan Goldins photography was displayed as slideshows with hundreds of slides set to rock and roll music. With all the nudity, drug use, and abusive photographs, there is no wonder people would come down hard and start debating if it was actually art or just a way to show off a bunch of naked people. The title of this slideshow is "The Ballad of Sexual Dependency".

Nan Goldin continued in the drug and counter-culture scene until the late 1980's when she entered a detox facility. There, Nan Goldin continued to take pictures. Many of them self-portraits.

The Artwork

Nan Goldins photography covers a very broad range of subject matter. From pretty rocks to nude children frolicking around, Nan Goldin covers it all. The big emphasis in the media is on the "pornographic" content. That's no fault of the media, it's just good news. There are many photographs of people after being beaten and tons of photographs of cross dressers.

Many of Nan Goldins photographs feature topless or fully nude women. Nude women showering, dancing, standing around. If they are nude, they are photographed. Many people deem this as pornography but really, most of these photographs are just human beings doing what they do. They aren't having sex or acting sexual most of the time.

The Newest Controversy

The week of September 24, 2007, Nan Goldins photograph entitled "Klara and Edda Belly-Dancing" was seized from Elton John's personal collection that was on loan to The Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art in England. Elton John is a well known collector of photographs and has a huge collection that numbers in the thousands by many famous artists. This particular photograph is part of a collection entitled "Thanksgiving" which is made up of 149 various photographs.

The authorities are deciding whether or not this picture breaks any laws

The piece in question depicts two very young girls around the age of 6 to 8. One is clothed and standing up and directly beneath her is the other girl naked with her legs spread while she is laying on her back. Interestingly, as I searched for this photo to see what the fuss was about, all results vanished. Way to go Internet!

I did find it before it disappeared and have to say I sure wouldn't want that picture anywhere near my home or computer. Even now after the short look I took I expect Chris Hanson from Dateline NBC to be dropping by and asking me some questions.

This is where that fine line between art and porn is. Would I call that art? Probably not. Porn? I don't think so. It was a picture of two young girls playing. That's all.

Published by Robert Sunset

I m from San Diego, CA. I love the beach, I love gaming, I love my kids and wife.  View profile

11 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Anonymous3/20/2009

    photos by nan goldin and others photographers http://passionisall.blogspot.com/

  • Mary-Jane6/20/2008

    I have seen some pictures of her, including the one with the two girls. As a definition, Visual Art is anything that has no other function than to please the eye. I can't say that I like her pictures much, but then, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. The two girls is something else. It is clearly done in a sexual way and that is where I draw a firm line. To depict children in such a way comes from a sick mind. I have to agree with Momie on this.

  • Jess Taylor2/24/2008

    I think its about how you look at it.
    She's breaking boundaries, getting our attention and well she's got it hasn't she?
    its good to be able to steer away from the norm.
    It's not always about being politically correct, we need to break from that and explore what we really aspire with the freedom to display it.
    Shakespeare wrote sexual stuff but we call it poetry... why is something visual any different?

  • Chris M. Carmichael12/10/2007

    very interesting article. I hadn't heard of her

  • Carol Bengle Gilbert11/26/2007

    It would be much easier to have an opinion on this were there photos to look at; on the other hand, you might be accused of distributing porn.

  • Momie Tullottes11/23/2007

    Great article! If it were adults, I'd say no problem, but being that it was children, even if it wasn't sexual in nature, then that to me screams wrong. Think of it like this: Would you want one of your kids depicted like that? I know I wouldn't. Taking a picture of baby's first bath and taking a picture of a nude child are two different things. The latter shouldn't happen. Displaying them for all to see is even worse.

  • J P Whickson11/10/2007

    I understand the fuss, considering there were minors. I really prefer pictures of everyone in a full suit of clothes, but that's me. We are a culture that thrives on diversity. Look at the works of art (?) that got grants from the Endowment for the Arts. Some are just trash. I did a college art project called "section of a bathroom wall" and gessoed a mason board and allowed graffiti and it was praised. Go figure.

  • Layla Lair11/8/2007

    I think the line can be very blured at times when one melts into the other.

  • Lisa Carey11/4/2007

    good questions and information, now i want to know more about this

  • Baton Rouge Lagniappe11/1/2007

    Provocative

Displaying Comments
Next »

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.