Yes, if Picasso was a film, he would cause lines longer than the Great Wall of China to form outside movie theaters. If he was a book, he would be responsible for the death of more trees than Harry Potter himself. If he was a play, he would bring down the house every single night and if he was a song, he would probably be performed on American Idol at least once every season.
Sylvette, a 1954 oil on canvas, was sold for an astounding 6.5 million dollars in Sydney on June 19, thus shattering the previous record, a mere (!) 3.48 million dollars, a fact that produced a general euphoria among Australians, galleries and art collectors.
The question that I can't help but ask is: why? What is it that makes a single painting so valuable to so many people? Aren't there more noble causes in the world if one wants to spend so much money on something that could be referred to as an eccentricity? What makes Picasso paintings so indispensable? And, to take matters a little further, will the twenty-first century eventually produce its own Picasso?
It's obvious that we cannot evaluate art with any of the standard measures of commercial value: it's not about cost and it's not about time or effort invested. It's not even about beauty or talent or aesthetics. Art is about an era and all that it entails. It's about perception and nostalgia. It's about ideas and ideals. Art is the memory of the details and as such it obeys to rules all of its own.
In our current society, individualism is promoted everywhere and art is no exception. There are no great schools, no collectives of artists, no cultural or artistic movements that gather public attention. Artists deem themselves unique and in many cases they are indeed just that. But it takes more than a unique talent to create a Picasso, a celebrity of sorts. It takes worldwide acceptance of the importance of a work of art. And also a strong sense of collectivity, camaraderie and support from within the artistic ranks.
We value our Picassos more than ever because we can't be certain that we will produce them in the present or the future.
Published by S. Mavroudis
xxx View profile
- Single and Lonely: The Golden Hour of Stragglin'Paramedics call the first hour after an injury the �Golden Hour' for the patient. In the world of Single-n-Lonely, this same principle can be applied to hanging out in the street when the club closes, only we ca...
- Single Parenting: Pros and ConsIn today's world, single parents are common.A positive effect of single parenting is that the parent usually tries to strive for a more enriched life. This usually leads to the single parent being more financially i...
- Single Parents Mingles ReviewIf you are a single Parent you may want to give this site a try.
- Single Parent and Loving It?Being a single parent has its ups and downs, but overall, I've become a strong and independent woman.
- Here's What You Say to Single MothersAre you never quite sure of what to say to single mothers? Have you inadvertently said something insensitive to a single mother in your life? There's time to remedy your faux pas! This how-to article explains how.
- Picasso Paintings Valued at $66 Million Stolen
- Real Tips for Real Single Moms!
- Life As a Single Parent
- Frigidaire 27" Single Electric Wall Oven
- 529 & Upromise: The Advantage for Single Parents
- Single Parents Tips to Saving for College
- How to Find a Needle for Your Record Player


2 Comments
Post a CommentInteresting thoughts, here! But I can't see myself spending a small fortune on art.
Sophie
It would seem that artistic preferences fluctuate with the capriciousness of human nature, taste, demand & supply... as well as the everlasting pursuit of (the semblance of?) immortality... :)