Please Downrate Me!

Why AC Content Producers Should Not Care About Article Ratings

Kirsten Van Detta
You thought it. You wrote it. You published it. Ratings went up. You made the front page. WOOT!

Then you check out the front page later only to find your article gone. Bummer. So you check out your rating. 1.3? 2.4? What? You have to read the comments so that you know why you suck so badly, but there aren't any! What gives?

Fellow AC Content Producers, since article ratings will not be going anywhere anytime soon, I would like to propose a new way to interpret your article ratings. (Here comes the reverse psychology for the "downrater".)

If your score is above a 4.7, you live with your mom and she has a network of computers at her disposal. She spends one hour per day rating your articles "5" over and over again. On a scale of 1 to 5, she loves you a 5.

Or, quite possibly, you practice "Starbating". Similar to "Googlebating" where you search for your own name on the internet; "Starbating" is where you rate your own articles over and over again. On a scale of 1 to 5, you love yourself a 5.

If your score is between 4.0 and 4.6, your fellow CP, friends and family love you. Your fellow CPs like your work and want you to check theirs out. Your friends like your work because it gets you paid which means you can pay them back for lunch the other day, and your family loves your work because they're finally glad you kicked your addiction of playing online Family Feud 6 hours a day. Good for you.

If your score is between a 3.0 or a 4.0, no one is seeing or reading your articles. You need to start networking a little. Although, you could join the 4.6 crowd and enjoy a little "you" time. Or, if you can get just one of your articles to hit the front page for a minute amount of time, the "downrater" can help you. How? Read on...

If your score is below a 3.0; you should be rejoicing. You are being read! If you're staring down a 1.4 and you didn't write an article about why the Holocaust was necessary or how society benefits from Child Pornography, then your rating should not be that low. So before you toss out that laptop and decide Burger King is your new career choice, take heart fellow CP. Low ratings mean more than you're being read, they also mean your clout is on its way to being orange with double rings. That nasty "downrater" has to visit your page every time he/she rates it. That's more page views for you. In addition, if someone really hates your work and feels the need to come back to your page over and over again to drive their argument home; page views! As Martha Stewart would say, "Page views; it's a good thing".

In the end, ratings on AC articles are really worthless except for the 15 minutes of glory you earn on the front page before the envious or disgruntled down rate your article so bad it would take your Mom a month to move it even one point.

I hope this makes the front page. I can't wait to be a 1.3!

Published by Kirsten Van Detta

Kirsten is a freelance writer who enjoys writing for Associated Content in her spare time.  View profile

  • The downrater is your friend.
  • Don't fight it.
  • Roll with it.
The downrater typically down rates articles within 30 minutes of making the front page. - Kirsten Van Detta. (I don't know if that really happens, but it sounded good didn't it?)

74 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Cindi Starr1/21/2008

    As one that is trying to increase my page views by other CP'ers, I found your article not only great, but the outlook is fantastic. Thank you for the encouragement. I am happy with any comments or ratings I get, lol.

  • Sophie8/19/2007

    This is funny, Kristen! Thanks for writing this article.
    Sophie

  • Kat Rice Williams8/16/2007

    Great article. I had a feature article once, listing the least intelligent dog breeds. The article was supposed to be fun, but I got a lot of nasty comments. I just erased them and moved on with my life.

  • Jennifer Claerr8/7/2007

    This is so cool. Thanks for writing!

  • Erin Adams8/1/2007

    This is great!

  • Robbie B7/1/2007

    LOL! What a fun take on something that tends to annoy me a lot...maybe I'll try not to be so bothered by the "downrater" next time. :-)

  • Candice W.5/28/2007

    Too funny. I'm not worried about ratings either.

  • M.S.Medina5/21/2007

    Been there, lol. Made it a couple of times and I went down from there.

  • Lindsey Russell4/7/2007

    What a great article!

  • Veronika Fevers3/29/2007

    I needed that! Thanks Kirsten! :)

Displaying Comments
Next »

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.