Candidates sling mud and oversell themselves throughout the campaign. For those who keep themselves aware of the actual positions and records of the candidates, all of the extracurricular gibberish is just that, gibberish. However, for the majority of Americans that pay little or no attention to such non-important facts like actual positions and records, the gibberish many times is perceived as fact. I ran across one shining example of this at a recent Christmas party. I happened to overhear a conversation between two people that were the typical non-political, uninformed Americans. One was explaining to the other that in 2008, when she was president, Hillary Clinton was going to give every American $4000.00 per child just for having the child. I knew what he was talking about because this was about the time when Hillary Clinton was attempting to buy a few uninformed votes from people like this by proposing something like giving federal funds to families for new children. When I heard this I asked this person if he planned to vote for Hillary because of this proposal she was making. He said that he would vote for anyone that would give him that much money.
This comment sparked a conversation between he and I where I asked him a few basic ideological questions. How do you feel about taxes? How do feel about government inserting it's self into you life? What about abortion, and personal values, and Christian morals? After he answered these and a few more question, I explained to him that he sounds like a fairly conservative person. I then explained Hillary Clinton's position and record on the same questions. He was shocked that he did not know any of that information about her. I explained that it was no surprise that he did not know this information. Most politicians try to keep the knowledge of their records and positions on certain topics, a guarded secret from those that base their voting decision on one or two advertisements that they see spewing the gibberish of the campaign.
There are certain number of people that know what they believe, and know what the candidates believe, and will vote for the republican candidate and about the same number of people that will vote for the democrat candidate. That means that our presidents are elected by those people that are just like the guy at the Christmas party, people that see a couple of commercials or overhear a conversation of people talking politics. This is a terrifying circumstance for people like me that understand the importance of American politics in today's world. I believe that it is tragedy that so many Americans take for granted one of the most important rights that we have as Americans. Because of its importance and worldwide ramifications of our elections, I believe that every American should be required to demonstrate that they understand the issues and are casting an informed ballot. I know that some people will say that this will disenfranchise some people, but I don't care. When a person casts a uniformed vote, they are causing more damage to this country than the restriction of voting rights to those who take the time to educate themselves about the issues and the candidates. I believe that this country would be better served if our national politicians were elected by a majority of the informed voters, not just a majority of voters.
Published by Michael K
Just an ordinary guy from the south View profile
Harvard Names Female President, Drew Gilpin FaustDrew Gilpin Faust, 59, was named as the first female president of Harvard University by the university's Board of Overseers on Sunday. Faust, a history scholar at Harvard, was n...- War Powers of President and (or Vs.) The CongressAt issue is the constitutional law governing the war power of the executive branch, specifically the vastness of the "battlefield" over which President Bush claims inherent authority as commander in chief. What will t...
Will Al Gore Run for President?Fresh off his win at the 2007 Oscars for his documentary "An Inconvenient Truth" speculation about the former Vice President's intentions for the 2008 run for the office heats up.- Legal Rights when Renting an Apartment or HouseFederal Law no one can be discriminated the right to rent. Lease outlines rights & obligations. Landlord provide basic services & tenant obligated to pay the rent, regardless circumstances. Reasons for security depos...
Foster Mother Loses Parental Rights in Connection with Lethbridge MurderIsaac Lethbridge was found beate, burned, and unresponsive in the home of Charlise Adams-Rogers. She now faces termination of her parental rights to her adopted children. The ve...
- Judicial Activism and Restraint: The Role of the Supreme Court
- Rudy Giuliani Commits Political Suicide: Donates Money to Abortion Rights Advocate...
- Michelle Obama Speaks Out for Change at Music Hall
- When Religion Really Bugs Me in Politics
- Someone Stop the President...Please
- Impeaching President Bush?
- Hillary Clinton for President?
- Restrict voting rights
- Litmus test for voters




2 Comments
Post a CommentA ballot cast based upon a informed opinion, regardless of how crazy I believe that opinion to be, is perfectly fine with me. It's the uninformed ballot based on rumor and/or advertisements that I believe is an insult and slap in the face to all those that have fought and died for right to vote. I think that if voters don't acknowledge the price paid for our rights by educating themselves prior to voting, then they should be stripped of their right to vote. Now how do we do that fairly??? I don't know but I think that people a lot smarter than me could figure it out.
Everyone should be better informed, there's no question about that. However, having an arbitrary guideline like "only informed voter's votes will count" is an extremely slippery slope, as it would be easy for each political party to attempt to discredit certain voters for different reasons, even reasons as simple as liking a certain candidate more ("she can't possibly know what she's talking about") or importance of one issue over another (for some, the most important issue is the war, for others, it's healthcare. Can you tell either side they're wrong?). Interesting article, but a dangerous proposition.