Political Role-Reversal: Ehrlich and O'Malley Debate

What a Difference Television Can Make

Stephanie Dray
This weekend Maryland's Gubernatorial debate between Baltimore Mayer Martin O'Malley (D-MD) and Governor Bob Ehrlich (R-MD) was played live on the radio. At first blush, O'Malley seemed to be faring well against Ehrlich, hitting all the points, but Ehrlich's brash radio personality had its appeal. It seemed like O'Malley's points were matched by Ehrlich's style.

Oh what a difference the medium can make. Tonight the debate was televised, and the difference could not have been more startling.

It was clear that no love was lost between the candidates, but any who feared Mayor O'Malley might let his famous anger show would be disappointed. O'Malley, who is sometimes criticized for letting his mouth get away from him, was calm and poised. It was Ehrlich who was on the ropes the entire time. The Governor pitched forward and back in his seat, rubbed his face with his hand, and looked like it was all he could do to fight off a sweaty upper lip.

The contrast was apparent from the opening statements alone. Ehrlich began by admitting that this election was a referendum on his incumbency and rattled off a list of his accomplishments that sounded more defensive than proud. O'Malley struck a Clintonian note, outlining large themes and talking about how he could use the things Marylanders have in common to help unite our state into action. Issue after issue, whether it was education, energy, taxes, or the environment, Ehrlich was on the defense. And while the Governor seemed to have a host of statistics at his fingertips, even the most astute viewer could get lost in the minutia.

Even when it came to crime - the very issue on which O'Malley has been under fire - it was O'Malley who scored punches while Ehrlich blocked. In a near role-reversal of the usual positions that Democrats and Republicans take when it comes to crime, it was O'Malley who launched into a passionate law-and-order tirade against repeat offenders and a failed parole system, while Ehrlich sputtered.

This was not the only role-reversal in the debate.

Nationally, it's the Republican party that is renowned for articulating broad themes and appealing to basic values while Democrats tick off a laundry list of programs. O'Malley and Ehrlich turned the tables, with O'Malley continuing to frame the debate over Maryland's future in the context of the challenges we face as neighbors and as a nation, while Ehrlich defended his flush tax.

Both candidates talked about Presidents. O'Malley pointed to the example of Kennedy and Eisenhower. Ehrlich told O'Malley not to blame everything on George Bush.

The Governor's blunt style might have made O'Malley seem too smooth - in fact, twice after O'Malley used soaring rhetoric, Ehrlich appealed to anti-intellectualism by sniffing, "I don't even know what that means."

But Ehrlich's bluntness, which works so well on the radio, did not serve him on television. And it was clear throughout that the challenger was setting the terms of the debate.

O'Malley gave Ehrlich few opportunities to land solid punches.

During the most heated exchange, when the Governor very effectively said he was going to "tell it like it is," O'Malley turned it around and bludgeoned him with it.

Ehrlich had emphasized that Maryland pays for Baltimore, and added, "Without us, you're done."

O'Malley didn't miss a beat, and agreed. "Yes, let's tell it like it is," he said, and reminded Ehrlich that Baltimore residents are Marylanders - using the comment as an effective metaphor for his claim that Ehrlich thinks of governance as an "us against them" proposition.

Only during the closing remarks did Mayor O'Malley finally give in to the temptation to tick off a laundry list of programs and plans, deftly holding up a bright green pamphlet with his campaign logo on it for the camera. It was Ehrlich who chose to close on some overarching ideas, like the fact that he had been elected to Annapolis to change the status quo. But now that he's the incumbent, that argument doesn't hold as much weight, and he seemed to know it when he earnestly asked Marylanders to vote for him.

Published by Stephanie Dray

Stephanie Dray is an author of historical fiction. Her debut novel, LILY OF THE NILE, will hit bookstore shelves in January 2011. She's a storyteller, a game designer, and a cat trainer. In a previous life,...  View profile

3 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Robert Chaban10/24/2006

    Fine piece. I wonder how many of the pinheads who gave it a poor rating understood the Nixon reference. I'm sure you know by now that ratings on this site mean next to nothing, as it is overpopulated with knee-jerk conservative republicans. Keep up the good work.

  • Major Goodbar10/17/2006

    I like your take on this. Can you preview the Duck/Bartlett race for us,The People?

  • Woodrow Simmons Jr10/16/2006

    It is amazing how a change of media can influence the perception one has of a person.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.