Portable CD Players Versus Portable Digital MP3 Players

Aaron Tadeo
Now here's a good match up and there are a lot of excellent points. Portable CD players became really popular a few years back. You probably saw a number of people don a CD player by the side of his/her pants or in his/her bag. Then, the portable digital MP3 players emerged. The most common and most famous of them all is, of course, the Apple iPod. But let's say you have to choose between the two, which would you choose?

Portability. They are both portable devices but which do you think is more economical? I'd go for the portable MP3 player. Let's say you have 15 music CDs, you'd have to bring them all with you. It's bothersome and it's annoying to constantly change the CDs. You won't have any problems at all with an MP3 player since the music is digital and is stored in the device itself. You just need to get used to the interface of the menus and you're set.

Sound Quality. Many would say that the CD has good quality but MP3s are much easier to modify and could even be played back at a better quality than CDs. But then, it doesn't really matter much since sound quality would mostly depend on your speakers or headsets. If you have a good quality headset, you'd probably have a better experience with your portable device regardless if it's CD or MP3. So it's a draw here.

Stability. Well, another point for the portable MP3 player. Let's say you're in a car. You have your CD playing and then you drive over a nasty bump on the road. It is possible that the music may jump or stop. You'd have to either restart the CD player or re-insert the CD itself. If you have a low-end portable CD player, it could even skip even when you are just walking. This is not a problem at all with portable digital MP3 players.

Data Storage. Again, the point goes to portable digital MP3 players (that's 3-0 in favor of the MP3 player). Music CD players are only capable of playing a small selection of songs. If you have a 30 GB digital MP3 player, you can have 1,000 or more songs in your library (that's roughly the equivalent of 50 or so CDs) and you can easily copy, delete, or add new songs. That is nearly impossible for CD players (unless it has writing capabilities) since they can only read CDs.

Price. Well, this is a draw as well. It really differs depending on the brand and the features. High-end CD or digital players may cost well over $200 and the entry levels would usually cost around $20 or so.

Well, those are just the basics and it seems that the portable digital MP3 player wins. But whichever you choose, what's important is that you enjoy the music you're playing and you feel relaxed. Enjoy your music!

Published by Aaron Tadeo

Writing has become one of my hobbies and I really love the feeling when I share my experiences and knowledge as a freelance writer. I'm currently working as a customer service rep. I love computers and been...   View profile

3 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Jim 2/23/2011

    Okay okay wait, i can understand portability (data storage included) but from there on out you've lost me... You're saying sound quality wise your mp3 is going to match the cd? Unless you're listening to a high end hifiman 801 or something. Plus to go with that you're explaining players, if you've already got good headphones... The CD player wins... I highly doubt that for a start and price?! really?! For the money you buy a 20 - 50 pound CD player (which, SQ wise blow your ipod out of the water) up against 200 pound ipods? If you get a high end portable CD player £200 i haven't even heard of that... But high end (Mp3) digital players can be seen selling for £600 odd. I'm not saying the convenience of an mp3 doesn't outweigh the massive annoyance of carrying around CD's i'm just saying... You sound like you work for apple lol

  • I do not understand. 4/14/2010

    If you have 5 CDs in your library, I can see how there can possibly be a draw. If it's anywhere over 50 (mine is around 450) the comparison is trivial. Both devices are portable, which means that a) you'll be away from your library and would have to take it with you just in case wherever you go and b) most of the time the portable device will probably be in a noisy environment, so the supposed sublime difference in sound quality won't matter.
    An illustration of the point:
    I was on vacation in may last August. While looking at the mist on the morning bay I felt like listening to Bach's English Suites. Luckily, I had my ipod with me, as my CD was snug on the shelf in my NYC apartment.

  • Myself 4/30/2009

    Good God! Have you vever heard of an MP3-CD player? And what's this bit about mp3's sounding BETTER than Redbook audio CD's?????

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.