Posing Nude a No-No According to the Air Force

Miss Faith
What's wrong with showing a little skin or even having the guts to pose nude in Playboy? Well according to the United States Air Force if you are still on active duty it's a definite no-no. 30 year old Michelle Manhart is, or rather was, a staff sergeant in the United States Air Force. Manhart is a wife and mother of 2 children. She enlisted into the Air Force in 1994, then spent some time in Kuwait in 2002, and up until recently was in charge of training other airmen at Lackland Air Force Base.

According to a statement from Oscar Balladares, spokesman from Lackland, "This staff sergeant's alleged action does not meet the high standards we expect of our airmen, nor does it comply with the Air Force's core values of integrity, service before self, and excellence in all we do." Manhart saw the situation completely different than the Air Force. She stated she was only trying to stand up for her own rights. She told the Associated Press "Of what I did, nothing is wrong, so I didn't anticipate anything. So I didn't think it would be a major issue."

So what exactly did Manhart do with Playboy that ended up getting her relieved of her duties as a Staff Sergeant in the US Air Force? She posed nude for the February issue of Playboy, which comes out this week, which is selected as the "special love issue". They photographed her in various poses, most of them naked and one specifically in uniform. The picture that was taken of her in uniform showed Manhart holding weapons and yelling with the caption "Tough Love". The various other pages of the spread showed her wearing her dog tags and working out, completely nude, as well as partially nude.

So how often does something like this happen? According to the US Military Newsletter on About.com, this was not the only incident of nudity in a magazine by a service member. Sherry Lynne White, a 2nd class Information Systems Technician in the United States Navy, posed nude for a September (1999) issue of Playboy, which was released July 31, 2000. The former command junior sailor was given a 6 page spread in Playboy that was titled "Naval Engagement. Join us in saluting a woman who's making waves." The pictures were taken at a resort in Hawaii and included White in uniform, along with various other military backdrops. By the time the issue hit newsstands in July, she had already been relieved of her duties in the Navy. She received an honorable discharge for misconduct on July 9th, only 4 months after she had posed nude for the magazine.

This is an example of only 2 cases of military discipline over posing nude whether while in uniform or not in uniform. In both cases, the women had made the choice to pose nude in Playboy of their own recognizance. Manhart stated she was only standing up for her rights. White on the other hand stated that one reason she took the opportunity was to pay off some bills and live for a few months. In the end, I wonder if they think it was all worth the consequences that soon followed. Who's to say if what they did was right or wrong? With controversy such as the Abu Grabe scandal or the problems in Gitmo, I would like to think that a woman showing a little skin would be the least of the US military's concerns.

*Sources*

-Fox News Website, http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,243178,00.html, Associated Press Article, "Air Force Staff Sergeant Relieved of Duties After Posing Nude in Playboy", 2007 January 12.

-US Military News at About.com, http://usmilitary.about.com/library/newsletters/blmilmatters68.htm, Military Matter newsletter #68, 2000 August 08.

Published by Miss Faith

Miss Faith is a full time student and she is currently working with About.com as the Guide to Makeup. She has finished her Bachelor's Degree in Intelligence Studies, as well as an Associate's Degree in CIS/N...  View profile

  • Michelle Manhart posed nude for Playboy for the February "specail love issue".
  • Sherry Lynne White posed for Playboy back in 1999/2000.
  • Is the military violating these women's rights by relieving them of their duties in the armed forces?

9 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Ham5/31/2012

    Yea they're SUPPOSED to be role models mhmm. the way i see it we are just using our military to show strength and nothing else. pretty sure our military is the only thing that may be able to DICTATE over another country and such. we should have a strong military(yes) and these people should be role models(yes) but the way i see it our own military(not the soldiers), the military system itself is not even portraying that of a role model. our government is pretty messed up right now that whatever they do and such is the right thing.

  • Bambi La Ronda5/31/2012

    "Using her uniform in that matter was totally irresponsible, and disrespectful to anyone in the military, and this country. " Yup! Exactly like sitting behind the President in a photo-op. Or starring in a movie about Seal Team 6.

  • pakoluvztaco5/31/2012

    she was too good for that gay community anyfucknway welcome back.

  • Coke5/30/2012

    How many people just looked her pics up?

  • jack5/30/2012

    kenya is right something need to catch up to the 21 century and our women of our armed forces now there not posing nude there just feeding there kids

  • br5495/30/2012

    My guess kenya is you never served in the military. If you had, you might understand. Once your signature is on that contract, you belong to the U.S. Government. Rules, codes, and expectations are spelled out very clearly. I have no problem with a mother breast feeding their babies or a woman posing nude in a mens publication but a contract is a contract. You don't follow it, you get disclipined. Plain and simple.

  • kenya5/30/2012

    i think the military has to catch up to the 21st century , there are bigger things to be concerned with besides what a mother does naturally thats the problem people forget that solders are PEOPLE FIRST and they are also moms WE MAY HAVE THE BIGGEST AND STROGEST MILITARY but act like we have the smallest brains

  • Heather B.5/22/2007

    Hannah's right. The reason it was a no-no was because she was wearing her uniform, thus she was representing the USAF, and that is not authorized. If she'd been wearing a bikini, it wouldn't have been such a big deal.

  • Hannah4/15/2007

    I am U.S. Air Force Vietnam Era Veteran, and I would like to say, she is supposed to be a role model not only for the military, but for the airmen she is training. Using her uniform in that matter was totally irresponsible, and disrespectful to anyone in the military, and this country. Women have come a long way in the military, they do not need to be seen in such a manner. It seriously hurts their image in the armed forces. It is a serious concern!

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.