There are several resolutions that will emerge on the Senate floor in the upcoming weeks. The resolutions will put the Senate on record for opposing President Bush new Iraq war strategy, particularly sending more troops. Even though the resolutions are non-binding, meaning the President does not have to follow them and really has no effect on the war in Iraq. They do, however, send a clear message to President Bush that Congress does not support him with the war.
Among the resolutions, Senator John Warner probably has the strongest to pass the Senate. His resolution, even though it opposes sending more troops to Iraq in general, would leave open the idea open to a small number of troops being sent into some of the Western Provinces of Iraq. Where those troops will be sent from will be a major debate because it is unclear where Warner's resolution says those troops will come from. Another resolution was introduces by Senators Joseph Biden and Carl Levin. Their resolution calls for no additional troops, at all, being sent to Iraq. Their resolution flatly states that sending more troops to Iraq would not be in the best interest to the United States.
There are even some Senators who still support President Bush and the war in Iraq. They also will try to muster enough support for their own resolution. Senators John McCain and John Cornyn are expected to draft separate but similar resolutions. But it will be hard for either to find much support in either or any Republican led resolutions because in those resolutions, they all for more troops. Any support those Senators were hoping for have already slipped to the Democrats and their resolutions.
Even though any of these resolutions are non-binding and President Bush is under no obligation to follow any of them; they do, however, let President Bush know where he stands with Congress. Both sides of the aisle are coming together in bipartisanship, which President Bush was hoping to avoid. President Bush knows he is losing Republican support for the war in Iraq.
But President Bush is standing firm and his response to Congress is that, regardless of what they say and do, he is the commander-on-chief and is the final decision maker on the war. He also challenge Democrats to come up with their own strategy for the War. President Bush must be a little concern because House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is in Iraq on her very own fact finding mission and could come back with a strategy. If any resolution is sent to the House after it passes the Senate, Pelosi could have influence over which resolution she might support. She has already stated she does not support the war and sending over more troops but is stopping short in stating Congress will cut the purse strings for the War. So even though President Bush may be the commander-in-chief, Congress does hold the financial say in the war by approving his requests for more funding.
The next few weeks will be critical for President Bush. Not only is he already challenging Congress with the war on Iraq, he has made his stance with Congress. He has let them know where Congress stands with him. But could that come back to haunt him because he still has two more years in office.
Published by ccates48439
I am a 32 yr old. I grew up in Michigan and still there to this day. View profile
- Book Review: "The Last True Story I'll Ever Tell: An Accidental Soldier's Account..."The Last True Story I'll Ever Tell," by John Crawford is a soldier's gritty account of the War in Iraq through a series of short stories. It is a must-read for anyone wanting a better understanding of what American...
- Presidential Candidate Congressman Dennis Kucinich Renews Call to End the War in IraqCongressman and presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich responded to a new report by the Congressional Budget Office that estimated the war in Iraq could cost the U.S. $1.9 trillion by 2017.
September Report on Progress on the War in IraqThe September report on how well or how weakly the USA is doing its job in Iraq is a hot topic for the whole country.- Center For Public Integrity: The Lies that Led to Bush's War in IraqIt is difficult to believe that there are still people in the world who cling to the notion that the build-up to the War in Iraq was not systematically orchestrated by the Bush administration. The outright falsehoods...
Congress Should Suspend NASA Until the War in Iraq is OverI propose that we push our Congressional leaders to move to suspend NASA completely until the war in Iraq is over.
- The War in Iraq was a Horrible Mistake
- US Wants More Troops in Afghanistan
- More Troops to Head for Afghanistan
- Obama Sends 17,000 Additional Troops to Afghanistan
- The Afghan War: Obama Will Send 17,000 Troops
- Britain to Send 500 More Troops to Afghanistan, If Conditions Met
- Omaha Nebraska Protests the War in Iraq

1 Comments
Post a CommentBush needs to realize there are too many troops away from home as it is.They need to come home.