It is no secret that President Obama is very much for eliminating nuclear weapons throughout the world. He received a Nobel prize for that very mindset. The vision is a noble one to be sure. The problem is, it is a threat to our national security to reduce arms in our country when we know that our enemies are building them. It is much like the game of Survivor. We are putting ourselves at risk if we make the move first in light of the clear intentions of our enemy. If they will not drop their nuclear program when we are a nuclear power, what makes Obama think they will consider it when we are not?
I am all for reducing our nuclear capabilities as a society, but we can not afford to do so until North Korea, Iran and other rogue nations come into compliance. We are simply setting ourselves up for a huge problems down the road. The slope is a slippery one and it seems very premature. Nuclear reduction only works when you have world compliance. If even one nation retains nuclear capabilities, then the world as a whole is at serious risk. No amount of nobility or good intentions will save us if one of these countries decides to strike.
Surely, we would be able to counter the strike to some degree. It is not about who would win. The use of nuclear weapons once would mean that we all lose, because it would set off a chain reaction throughout the world. North Korea and Iran are sitting on their capabilities because they know we have the power to eliminate them entirely. If we take away that power, we put ourselves at risk even more for nuclear war.
By all means, President Obama, reduce the arms and nuclear capabilities of the world. Do so through diplomacy and leadership with foreign nations and by all means allow the country to lead by example.
But do not throw away our immunity idol when other countries continue to have theirs. You will get voted off the island.
Source:
Published by Rodney Southern - Featured Contributor in Sports
My name is Rodney Southern and I have a lovely wife, Julie, and two beautiful twin daughters, Brooke and Valerie. Also, I was the 2008 Ultimate Call for Content Winner, and awarded a Top 100 badge for Associ... View profile
- Nuclear Weapons? Whats the Point?In this article Cameron Cowan theorizes on why nuclear weapons are not productive in modern International Relations.
How Much Do You Know About Nuclear Weapons?How nuclear weapons work and the devastation they cause- Does North Korea Really Pose a Nuclear Threat?Information on the advancement of North Koreas' nuclear development.
Why Nuclear Weapons Are FunWhat to do when you're buried 60 feet underground behind two eight-ton blast doors for 24 hours at a time, and nuclear missiles under your command.
North Korea Promises No More Nuclear TestsNorth Korea's leader, Kim Jong II, has said that he doesn't plan to conduct any further nuclear tests.
- North Korea and Iran's Nuclear Aspirations
- Nuclear Weapons: An Unnecessary Tool of U.S. Foreign Policy
- A Nuclear Weapons-Free World? Really?
- Assessing the Nuclear Threat
- U.N. Sanctions Against North Korea Are Still Absolutely Necessary
- North Korea: Yearning for Dialogue
- North Korea Nuclear Test Spurs Global Arms Race
- President Obama is premature in reducing nuclear arms.
- North Korea and Iran are far too dangerous.
- Wait until the world is on board completely.





9 Comments
Post a CommentJulia, that is not the point. What Obama has done is make it more likely that someone "will" attack. The fact we have the option to wipe them off the planet is not a good thing. As I stated in the article, if the nukes fly we all lose regardless of who could win. The key is to keep the attack from happening in the first place. Taking away the one thing that prevents N Korea and Iran from attempting something is not the safest route to preventing an attempt in my opinion. Thanks for your opinion though and it is well taken. Hope you are doing well. Been a while.
North Korea and Iran will never come into complaince. We can't let the rogue nations set the agenda for our nation. Obama made a brave move. He left enough "provisions" that he can change it in case of attack
You've caused me to think about something I would rather not...with a well-written article.
ditto to what Jaipi said and another famous song quote... "War... what is it good for? Absolutely nothing!"- Edwin Starr
Interesting topic from you and well written.
Well done, nice work.
Imagine there's no countries, it isn't hard to do, nothing to kill or die for, and no religion too. Imagine all the people sharing all the world. I guess I'm just a dreamer but as Lennon said, I'm not the only one.
Thank you for your submission. Your article has been featured on AC's opinion category.
Well, I believe the President should be allowed to do what all other world leaders have done throughout history: Say whatever he needs to, then do whatever he wants. Treaty? What treaty?