While students will continue to be tested annually in reading and math, under the new proposal, schools may now include test scores from other subjects as well. And, rather than determine student success-and by extension, school success-based upon students' ability to score at a specific grade level, achievement will be recognized in students who demonstrate significant gains over the course of a school year, regardless of grade level proficiency.
An additional change is in how each plan addresses the needs of poor students classified as part of the federally funded Title I program. NCLB mandates that states adopt challenging academic standards, but permits each state to define "challenging." The new proposal instead, requires schools receiving Title I funding to adopt "college-and career-ready standards" in order to qualify for funding.
This raises perhaps the most notable change, which is in the educational focus. If implemented, the changes proposed by the Obama administration shift the emphasis from the overall number of students showing grade level proficiency as measured by standardized tests scores to readiness for either college or a career, with schools being required by 2020 to verify that all students are ready.
The bottom 5 percent of schools, in terms of achievement, will close under the new plan, while the next-lowest 5 percent will be placed on a warning list and be admonished to improve. The 5 percent of schools with the widest disparities in achievement within each school will be required to narrow the gaps. This leaves the vast majority of schools to implement changes without government intervention.
How the Changes Affect Your Child
With educational standards-and the tools for measuring them-continually changing, parents might well be confused about how all of this affects their children. Ultimately, while adults are the architects of educational change, students are the ones most affected by it.
In terms of standardized exams, students will have a greater opportunity to meet standards under the proposed plan. Since this plan allows-but does not require-school systems to include subjects beyond math and reading, school systems that choose to do so, broaden the presentation of their students' overall skills and knowledge.
Students are also more apt to have classes that allot equal time to subjects other than math and reading, as teachers might no longer feel compelled to narrow the curriculum to focus on reading and math test essentials. And, along similar lines, high school may return to preparing students for vocations as well as for college in accordance with the new plan's emphasis on readiness.
Additionally, by including progress as a measure of success, students and schools are less likely to be labeled "failures" than under NCLB, which does not consider progress. On the other hand, parents will no longer have the option (or, perhaps, the need) to transfer students from "failing" schools; such schools will close under the new plan.
Sources:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/14/education/14child.html?ref=education
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/13/AR2010031301137.html
Published by Denise Fawcett Facey
A writer and educator, Denise Fawcett Facey has years of experience in education and the issues surrounding it. Additionally, with an informal background in home decor and gardening, she has experience consu... View profile
- School Reform and No Child Left Behind ActThe time period of this piece will start in the early 1950's and extend into the next century. This paper will reflect upon the four principles of the No Child Left Behind Act and will present an essay on contemporary...
- Will the No Child Left Behind Act Solve Problems with Our Education System?As our economy changes, is our educational system changing with it? Is the No Child Left Behind Act a detriment to our public educational system? Some say it is and some say the federal government needs out of education.
The Impact of the No Child Left Behind ActThe No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) addresses educational reform, but the reality of NCLB is that it acts as a smokescreen, designed to make people believe that the Bush adminis...- Positives of No Child Left BehindHow No Child Left Behind is actually good for schools and not a way to make teachers jobs harder.
The No Child Left Behind Act Fails to DeliverNo Child Left Behind Act does not achieve the original goal and public schools suffer because of it.
- The Effect of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2002 on Special Education and Learning
- Understanding the No Child Left Behind Act
- President Obama; Making Changes Quickly
- Hidden Genius and Public Schools
- NteQ Lesson Plan for SE Hinton's the Outsiders
- What Does No Child Left Behind Mean?
- The No Child Left Behind Legislation is Not Working
- Edcational emphasis shifts from standardized exams to preparedness
- College and Career Readiness are new goals
- Low-performng schools will close


