That, however, has been slow moving. So who's to say that one single party can do better? I am definitely not one of those people. I'll admit the need for the change is evident, but the kind of change should not be just between red or blue.
The last seven years have been one of the worst foreign policy handlings for the U.S. government. It's no surprise that the Bush Administration is partly responsible for the current situation, but now Democrats are encouraging people to vote for them mainly on the issue of foreign policy.
Many Democrats have claimed that their supposed handling of the War on Terror would've the exact opposite of what it is. Those who speak out against Bush claim that their approach would've been flawless, which is completely doubtful. It's always easy to point at the person who screws up big time.
I'm not for Bush at all, but I'll probably be one of the very few to give him some credit for seeing his plan through. At this point it's just useless for anyone to assume alternative handlings of what should've happened because we can't change the past.
As I watch coverage of the campaigns, I notice the "measures," such as celebrity sponsoring and expensive haircuts, taken by the candidates. I previously thought that campaigns should serve the candidates and the people. Seeing this crap has makes me think otherwise; however, this does show faults within the candidates. Seeing a person's faults reminds us that nobody, Republican or Democrat, is perfect and whoever gets elected cannot be considered the perfect choice.
As the 2008 Presidential Election draws near, I keep hearing how everything is going to be changed. It's pretty obvious that this change won't happen overnight. Whoever gets elected is going to have to clean up after Bush, and there's a lot of garbage needed to be picked up.
The way I see it is that everyone knows what needs to be done. People who see the solution as either relying on the Republicans or bringing in Democrats are wrong. The scrutinizing of both parties needs to stop. It's sad, but I've lowered my standards for this election. All I ask is for the President to be a decent person and not to screw up.
Published by Randy Mills
I am a student at a local university attending for my MBA degree. I work full time and occasionally write as a hobby. I was born and lived in England for 12 years then immigrated to the US. View profile
- Wisconsin Voter's Guide to State Elections 2006A guide to Wisconsin state elections in 2006.
- Being a Republican at the Maine Democratic Presidential CaucusMy mother, Joyce Halford, was a rarity at one Maine Democratic Presidential Caucus on Sunday, February 10th. She is a registered Republican.
- Denver the Queen of the Rockies Gets 08 Democratic ConventionHoward Dean,Chairman of the D.N.C. announced today Denver is the choice for the Democratic Convention in 2008.
Foreign Policy is the Name of the Game at the First Presidential Debate...The agenda of both candidates will be revealed on how they are going to approach foreign policy should they be elected.- Canadian Foreign Policy in the Post-Sept. 11 WorldPolicy changes have a global impact; reforms that Canada identified and implemented would send out ripple effects since Canada has long been considered stable & consistent
- Updating "The Making of the Presidential Candidates 2004"
- Presidential Elections: For the Elite Only
- Remembering Three Presidential Elections
- The Biggest Landslides in Amerian Presidential Elections
- Instances of Threat Headlines in Major Newspapers Before and After a Presidential...
- Watershed 1900 Elections (Addendum to N. Baters on AC)
- Tea Party Movement: Elections Not Rallies

