The removal of the books is in response to a federal directive which is designed to keep radical religious books from falling into the hands of violent inmates. The directive, which was a consequence of the September 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, was finally enforced at Otisville and noticed by the inmates on Memorial Day.
According to CBS, the removal is nation-wide and is aimed at all religions, although Islam seems to be a particular target. The lawsuit was filed by three inmates who say that the book removal policy violates their Constitutional First Amendment rights. In the suit, they claim that some of the books that were taken were ones used by the Christian population of the prison to "minister to new converts when come in here," according to John Okon who spoke on behalf of the prison's Christians. In the CBS report, Okon says he is concerned about the loss of the books because he has seen "religion turn around the life of some of these men."
Speaking for the government, Assistant U. S. Attorney Brian Feldman explained that the number of books for each religion is limited to 100-150 books. He said that number could increase in the future.
One reason for delaying the implementation of the policy so long after the September 2001 attacks, according to CBS, was because of the time involved in the process of prison officials reading through the books to see what would be permitted and what would not.
Books are not the only concern with regard to prison religious life. Feldman went on to explain that another issue concerns the people who conduct services for the prisoners. Feldman told CBS that prisons "had been radicalized by inmates who were practicing or espousing various extreme forms of religion, specifically Islam, which exposed security risks to the prisons and beyond the prisons to the public at large."
The review of prison ministry procedures also urges that worship areas, chapel classrooms, and religious services be monitored in order to eliminate extreme or radical viewpoints. In response to the claim of First Amendments being violated, Ron Kuby, a civil rights lawyer told CBS that the issue is not that clear-cut because being in prison is a limitation of prisoners' First Amendment rights in itself.
Source:
Published by Bible Doc
I am a (mostly) retired minister. I spent a few years teaching Bible courses in a Christian school. One of my goals is to write. I see Associated Content as a step toward fulfilling that goal. View profile
Rick Perry of Texas Asserts 10th Amendment RightsGovernor Rick Perry of Texas has joined with state legislators to push for a resolution confirming the 10th Amendment rights of states such as Texas against the encroachment of...
Can Prison Inmates Use the Internet? TRULINCS: Technology Freedoms From...It seems that prison inmates receive just about every luxury that's available on the outside, but what about things like the Internet?
Suppression of First Amendment Rights on College Campuses The nonprofit Foundation for Individual Rights in Education gave 229 Universities its "red light" ranking, the lowest mark in the report.
One Third of California Prison Inmates Handed Get Out of Jail Free Cards...While Los Angeles gangs are murdering children in drive by shootings and the Mexican drug war is spilling over onto American soil, federal judges have ordered California to rele...
How to Be Politically Correct in the Workplace - Without Losing Your Fir...This presentation concentrates on how employees can express their views in a diverse environment without crossing the line into being offensive.
- Banned and Burned: A History of Book Censorship on Religious Grounds
- The Ability or Inability of the Arts to Affect Social Change
- The Threat of Radical Islam
- Bill Glass, Former Pro Bowl Defensive Standout for the Cleveland Browns, Now Share...
- California Legislature Votes on Early Release for Prison Inmates to Save Money
- 2nd Amendment Rights Under Attack?
- Second Amendment Rights Need Federal Protection
