Ergo, FNC was all over Brennan's very suspicious-to-the-point-of-ignorance comments that they spent a portion of their broadcast day actively analyzing and skewering said comments. When I was watching Special Report, Brit Hume had a commentary/analysis where he almost had somewhat of a conniption-with good reason-at the utter naivety/gullibility/absurdity of Brennan's Fox News Sunday comments in the Abdulmuttalab case.
According to Hume, Brennan sidestepped Fox News Sunday Chris Wallace's question about the downside of not treating the Terrorist Abdulmutallab as an enemy combatant, then shockingly even denied there were any downsides or upsides to doing so! Now for anyone who's not drunk on the radical liberal kool-aid, they know precisely that the irrefutable downside of approaching terrorists like Abdulmutallab in a criminal manner means they get a lawyer, clam up, and refuse to talk to you, which is what Abdulmutallab has already done thanks to Obama and Brennan!
Not content to let Hume do all the hammering on Brennan, former speaker Newt Gingrich joined the rightful pile-on on Brennan when he appeared on the O'Reilly Factor. Gingrich's problem with Brennan was his stunningly deluded denial of a smoking gun in the Abdulmutallab incident. Huh? W-w-w-what??! No smoking gun, says Brennan! As Gingrich pointed out in his appearance, what the heck does Brennan call the whole alerting of the American embassy by the terrorist's father and his name's appearance on watch-lists??!! Good God! Just as properly, Gingrich points out that the US has no obligation to admit anyone entry and that the burden of proof should be on the people vying to enter the US in the first place.
All told, the gist of Hume's and Gingrich's unhappiness with Obama Counterterrorism aide John Brennan's discreditable comments is that Brennan is living in a make-believe, fairy tale world of his own, liberal making instead of focusing on realistically preventing terror attacks domestically. That is why Brennan doesn't acknowledge that we're still on a War on Terror:
That is why Brennan claims there's no smoking gun in the Abdulmutallab case and allows him even legal representation-which also means that in order to get Abdulmutallab to talk now, the US will even have to strike a plea deal with him when classifying him as an enemy combatant would've already required him to talk! That is why Brennan doesn't know what he's doing.
To send Marc questions, praise or criticism, you can email him at marc_schenker@telus.net
Sources:
Fox News Sunday - John Brennan Deputy National Security Adviser, YouTube
Brit Hume's Commentary 1/4, FoxNews.com
Clifford Bryan, Abdulmutallab lawyer Miriam Siefer shuts client up: Barack Obama stresses accountability, Examiner.com
Newt's Take, FoxNews.com
White House: "War on Terrorism" is over..."Jihadist" and "Global War" also unacceptable terms, YouTube
Published by Marc Schenker
Contact Marc at marc_schenker@telus.net to praise, criticize, or request anything of him since he fears nothing or no one. Marc Schenker is a political junkie and Political Writer and Analyst for Associated... View profile
Murder Rates and Violent Crimes in America Vs. The War on Terror and Ter......look at the staggering contrast between what we do to ourselves and what the terrorist have done and think about which one poses more of a risk to the American people.- Is America Losing the War on Terror?Bush and Co. claim the war on terror is being won and that leaving Iraq would bring terrorists to your back door. Apparently, they are the only people in Washington who believe these things.
- 24, Fiction and the War On TerrorFighting the War on Terror is all that some presidential candidates have to offer
- The War on Terror: A Tragedy of Errors - Why It's Time to Cut Our Losses and RunThe so-called "war on terror" cannot be won by sending troops to fight in Iraq. The best way to achieve homeland security is to bring the troops home and begin using our human and financial resources to protect our na...
Why the "War on Terror" is WrongIntended as a rebuttal to Greg Reesons article, What the Democrats Don't Understand about the War on Terror. I contend that the "war on terror" is wrong. It is wrong because the...
- The 24 Hour "News" Networks Give You Round the Clock Coverage of Anna Nicole and C...
- Embarrassed Obama Finally Admits Detroit Terrorist was Not Isolated but Linked to...
- Bush vs. Iraq: How the war on terror became a war on Iraqi human rights
- War on Terror
- President Bush and "The War on Terror"
- The War on Terror: Protesting the Liberation of Iraq
- What the Democrats Don't Understand About the War on Terror





2 Comments
Post a Commentgood topic, good work. even worse (if that's possible)is janet napolitano.
first