The earmark was added to the Fiscal Year 2008 Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriation Bill's Committee Report. A total of 33 Civil Rights, Education, Science, and Religious groups opposed the earmark and made known their satisfaction that it had been withdrawn.
The earmark was added by Senator David Vitter (R-LA) and proposed that $100,000 of federal funding should go to the Louisiana Family Forum. Vitter claimed that the grant would accomplish: "a plan to promote better science education."
The civil rights, education, science, and religious groups were immediately up in arms over the proposed grant because of the Louisiana Family Forum's stated mission. The forum's mission is to: "persuasively present biblical principles in centers of influence."
The groups claim that the Louisiana Family Forum has in the past been a passionate activist for the cause of teaching creationism in the classroom in public schools. The forum was reportedly instrumental in the Louisiana School Board's past decision to allow teachers to point out alleged weaknesses in the theory of evolution in the hopes of highlighting the creationism versus evolution controversy.
Rights groups also claim that the Louisiana Family Forum consistently publishes intelligent design addendums designed for teachers to use in addition to public science school textbooks. The groups claim that these addendums substitute scientific explanations of natural phenomena such as fossils with biblical ones.
The groups pointed out that the Supreme Court has ruled that Creationism in any form can not be taught in public schools because: "the preservation and transmission of religious beliefs and worship is a responsibility and a choice committed to the private sphere."
Senior Lobbyist Terri Schroeder of the American Civil Liberties Union made these comments regarding the earmark: "James Madison, the principal author of the First Amendment, believed that even a 'three-pence' tax to fund religious education was a violation of freedom of religion. As soon as religion begins to intrude into our government and the publicly funded arena, the ideals and principles of both become compromised."
Schroeder commented further: "For the federal government to allow such funding to take place would have not only been unconstitutional, but also a waste of tax payer money and a degradation of our school curriculum. The ACLU is relieved that Senator Vitter came to his senses and withdrew this misguided proposal."
Published by A. Kairi
A. Kairi is a natural beauty care and crafting enthusiast that has operated a natural beauty care products business since 2004. She has held dozens of natural beauty care workshops in private venues and at M... View profile
- Voting: Seperation of Church and StateOn Tuesday November 4th, I, like many other young American's will walk up and place my ballot in the box for the first time ever.
- Separation of Church and StateIs religion really separate from government. Turn on the news and watch the news. The judicial system decides what we can say, where we can say it, and how we can say, if we can say it at all (and churches help set...
Conflict Over Church and State Still Haunts American LandscapeThe battle of the seperation of Church and State remains a vital, hot-topic issue in American politics.- How the Theory of Evolution Can Explain Humor A brief paper shedding light upon the theory of "Why we laugh?"
Freedom of Religion Dosen't Apply to Rastafarians?The United States of America is a great place, however it's historical treatment of the rastafarian people and their constitutionally guranteed right to use their religious sacr...
- The Truths of the American Civil Liberties Union
- Affirmative Action: The Unstated Target of the Colorado Civil Rights Initiative
- ACLU Guilty of Stripping Away the Civil Liberties of Religious Americans?
- California's Mexican-Americans and Asian-Americans
- The Ninth Malaysia Plan Seeks to Improve Country's Economy and Status
- ACLU Lawsuit Over Quran Oaths Can Continue
- Why I Hate the ACLU
- Vitter proposed that the Louisiana Family Forum (LFF) Receive$100,000 in Federal Grant Money
- The LFF's stated mission is to: "persuasively present biblical principles in centers of influence"
- The LFF also published intelligent design factsheets meant for teachers to use in the classroom

2 Comments
Post a CommentI agree with Carol. I'm Christian, but I think that the only way religion should be taught in public school is if other religions are covered as well.
Pointing out flaws in the theory of evolution is one thing, but funding a religious org to promulgate its religion in public schools is something quite different. Glad this earmark was caught and removed.